Effectiveness of the exhalation delivery system with fluticasone for treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1007/s00405-024-09073-2
Yun Jin Kang, Gulnaz Stybayeva, Se Hwan Hwang
{"title":"Effectiveness of the exhalation delivery system with fluticasone for treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yun Jin Kang, Gulnaz Stybayeva, Se Hwan Hwang","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-09073-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We evaluated the effects of two doses (186 µg and 372 µg) of exhalation delivery system with fluticasone (EDS-FLU) on chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyp as a novel sinonasal delivery system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 5 studies retrieved from PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to April 2024, focusing on subjective and objective scores, and adverse and beneficial effects (responder and complete responder rates, improvements in Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC] scores, and surgical indication rates before and after EDS-FLU use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 3 months, EDS-FLU significantly reduced polyp (mean difference [MD] - 1.1605; 95% confidence interval [CI] [- 1.3277; -0.9934], I<sup>2</sup> = 61.4%) and 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (MD - 20.7561; 95% CI [- 22.3473; -19.1648], I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%) scores compared to baseline. At 1 month, nasal congestion, facial pain, olfactory dysfunction, and rhinorrhea significantly improved compared to baseline. EDS-FLU significantly reduced the surgical indication rate (odds ratio 0.2594; 95% CI [0.1910; 0.3522], I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%) and improved patient satisfaction, with 63.34% of patients reporting significant improvement in PGIC scores after 3 months. However, adverse effects, including epistaxis, headache, nasal congestion, and nasopharyngitis, were reported, with incidence rates ranging from 4.46 to 8.99%. There were no significant differences in beneficial or adverse effects between high and low fluticasone doses, but the high dose was associated with a higher percentage of complete responders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both doses of EDS-FLU significantly improved subjective and objective outcomes of CRS patients with nasal polyps. However, epistaxis and nasal septal erosive or ulcerative lesions were also considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-09073-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated the effects of two doses (186 µg and 372 µg) of exhalation delivery system with fluticasone (EDS-FLU) on chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyp as a novel sinonasal delivery system.

Methods: We analyzed 5 studies retrieved from PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to April 2024, focusing on subjective and objective scores, and adverse and beneficial effects (responder and complete responder rates, improvements in Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC] scores, and surgical indication rates before and after EDS-FLU use.

Results: Over 3 months, EDS-FLU significantly reduced polyp (mean difference [MD] - 1.1605; 95% confidence interval [CI] [- 1.3277; -0.9934], I2 = 61.4%) and 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (MD - 20.7561; 95% CI [- 22.3473; -19.1648], I2 = 0.0%) scores compared to baseline. At 1 month, nasal congestion, facial pain, olfactory dysfunction, and rhinorrhea significantly improved compared to baseline. EDS-FLU significantly reduced the surgical indication rate (odds ratio 0.2594; 95% CI [0.1910; 0.3522], I2 = 0.0%) and improved patient satisfaction, with 63.34% of patients reporting significant improvement in PGIC scores after 3 months. However, adverse effects, including epistaxis, headache, nasal congestion, and nasopharyngitis, were reported, with incidence rates ranging from 4.46 to 8.99%. There were no significant differences in beneficial or adverse effects between high and low fluticasone doses, but the high dose was associated with a higher percentage of complete responders.

Conclusion: Both doses of EDS-FLU significantly improved subjective and objective outcomes of CRS patients with nasal polyps. However, epistaxis and nasal septal erosive or ulcerative lesions were also considered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氟替卡松呼气给药系统治疗伴有鼻息肉的慢性鼻窦炎的疗效:系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:作为一种新型鼻窦给药系统,我们评估了两种剂量(186 µg 和 372 µg)的氟替卡松呼气给药系统(EDS-FLU)对伴有鼻息肉的慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)的影响:我们分析了截至2024年4月从PubMed、SCOPUS、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane数据库中检索到的5项研究,重点研究了使用EDS-FLU前后的主观和客观评分、不良和有益效果(应答者和完全应答者比率、患者整体印象变化[PGIC]评分的改善以及手术适应症比率):与基线相比,EDS-FLU 在 3 个月内显著降低了息肉(平均差 [MD] - 1.1605; 95% 置信区间 [CI] [- 1.3277; -0.9934],I2 = 61.4%)和 22 项鼻窦结果测试(MD - 20.7561; 95% CI [- 22.3473; -19.1648],I2 = 0.0%)评分。一个月后,鼻塞、面部疼痛、嗅觉功能障碍和鼻出血与基线相比均有明显改善。EDS-FLU 明显降低了手术指征率(几率比 0.2594;95% CI [0.1910;0.3522],I2 = 0.0%),提高了患者满意度,63.34% 的患者在 3 个月后报告 PGIC 评分明显改善。但也有不良反应,包括鼻衄、头痛、鼻塞和鼻咽炎,发生率为 4.46% 至 8.99%。高剂量和低剂量的氟替卡松在获益和不良反应方面没有明显差异,但高剂量的完全应答者比例较高:结论:两种剂量的 EDS-FLU 均能显著改善鼻息肉 CRS 患者的主观和客观疗效。不过,鼻衄和鼻中隔侵蚀性或溃疡性病变也在考虑之列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Endoscopic ear surgery in the treatment of chronic otitis media with atelectasis. Correction: A novel olfactory sorting task. Cochlear implantation in patients with inner ear schwannomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of audiological outcomes. Efficacy and safety of middle turbinate surgery: a systematic review. Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss after COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1