Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of Spondyloarthritis Knowledge Questionnaire: A Methodological Study.

IF 1.3 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY European journal of rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.5152/eurjrheum.2024.24005
Öznur Erbay Dallı, Seda Pehlivan, Tuğba Ocak, Arzu Ceyhan, Yavuz Pehlivan
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of Spondyloarthritis Knowledge Questionnaire: A Methodological Study.","authors":"Öznur Erbay Dallı, Seda Pehlivan, Tuğba Ocak, Arzu Ceyhan, Yavuz Pehlivan","doi":"10.5152/eurjrheum.2024.24005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Information and education are recommended for patients with inflammatory arthritis including spondyloarthritis (SpA). However, there is no Turkish instrument available to measure the knowledge level of patients with SpA. The study aimed to translate the Spondyloarthritis Knowledge Questionnaire (SPAKE) into Turkish and investigate its validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This methodological study was conducted between February 2023 and August 2023 in patients with SpA. Data were collected using the \"Patient Characteristics Form\" and the \"Turkish version of SPAKE (SPAKE-T).\" Language, content, item analysis, known-group technique, test-retest, and internal consistency were used to evaluate validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 226 SpA patients participated in the study. The validity and reliability analysis of SPAKE-T showed the following results: (a) content validity index at item level between 0.86 and 1.00, (b) significant correlation between the total score of the questionnaire and its sub domains between 0.18 and 0.81 (P < .05), (c) item difficulty between 0.11 and 0.91, (d) item discrimination index between 0.26 and 0.81, (e) within the known group validity, significantly lower knowledge scores in patient groups with low education level, disease duration less than 10 years, and patients who did not receive education about their disease (P < .05), (f ) Cronbach alpha value was 0.80, and (g) test-retest reliability was 0.81.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicates that the SPAKE-T, which has satisfactory psychometric properties, can be easily used to assess the overall knowledge level of patients with SpA about disease self-management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12066,"journal":{"name":"European journal of rheumatology","volume":"11 2","pages":"39-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjrheum.2024.24005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Information and education are recommended for patients with inflammatory arthritis including spondyloarthritis (SpA). However, there is no Turkish instrument available to measure the knowledge level of patients with SpA. The study aimed to translate the Spondyloarthritis Knowledge Questionnaire (SPAKE) into Turkish and investigate its validity and reliability.

Methods: This methodological study was conducted between February 2023 and August 2023 in patients with SpA. Data were collected using the "Patient Characteristics Form" and the "Turkish version of SPAKE (SPAKE-T)." Language, content, item analysis, known-group technique, test-retest, and internal consistency were used to evaluate validity and reliability.

Results: A total of 226 SpA patients participated in the study. The validity and reliability analysis of SPAKE-T showed the following results: (a) content validity index at item level between 0.86 and 1.00, (b) significant correlation between the total score of the questionnaire and its sub domains between 0.18 and 0.81 (P < .05), (c) item difficulty between 0.11 and 0.91, (d) item discrimination index between 0.26 and 0.81, (e) within the known group validity, significantly lower knowledge scores in patient groups with low education level, disease duration less than 10 years, and patients who did not receive education about their disease (P < .05), (f ) Cronbach alpha value was 0.80, and (g) test-retest reliability was 0.81.

Conclusion: This study indicates that the SPAKE-T, which has satisfactory psychometric properties, can be easily used to assess the overall knowledge level of patients with SpA about disease self-management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其版脊柱关节炎知识问卷的心理计量特性:方法学研究。
背景:建议为包括脊柱关节炎(SpA)在内的炎症性关节炎患者提供信息和教育。然而,目前还没有土耳其语工具可用于测量脊柱关节炎患者的知识水平。本研究旨在将脊柱关节炎知识问卷(SPAKE)翻译成土耳其语,并调查其有效性和可靠性:本方法学研究于 2023 年 2 月至 2023 年 8 月期间在 SpA 患者中进行。使用 "患者特征表 "和 "土耳其语版 SPAKE(SPAKE-T)"收集数据。采用语言、内容、条目分析、已知组技术、重测和内部一致性等方法来评估有效性和可靠性:共有226名SpA患者参与了研究。SPAKE-T的效度和信度分析结果如下:(a)项目水平的内容效度指数在0.86和1.00之间;(b)问卷总分与其子域之间的显著相关性在0.18和0.81之间(P < .05);(c)项目难度在0.11和0.91之间;(d)项目辨别指数在0.26和0.81之间;(e)项目一致性在0.26 和 0.81 之间;(e)在已知组别有效性范围内,受教育程度低、病程少于 10 年和未接受疾病教育的患者组别知识得分明显较低(P < .05);(f )克朗巴赫α 值为 0.80;(g)测试-再测信度为 0.81:本研究表明,SPAKE-T具有令人满意的心理测量特性,可轻松用于评估SpA患者对疾病自我管理的整体知识水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bullous Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus and Class V Lupus Nephritis: Rare Concurrence. Comparison and Significance of Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic Findings of Large-Vessel Vasculitis Before and After Treatment: Differences Between Takayasu Arteritis and Giant Cell Arteritis. Evaluation of Rheumatologists' Teledermatology Practices and Perspectives. Factors Associated with the Development of Anti-drug Antibodies to TNFi and the Consequences for Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Two-year Follow-up Study. Homeopathy for Rheumatological Diseases: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1