Hongyan Yin, Rongkui Luo, Jing Lv, Wujian Mao, Hongcheng Shi
{"title":"Relationship between [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT findings and claudin 18.2 expression in metastatic gastric cancer.","authors":"Hongyan Yin, Rongkui Luo, Jing Lv, Wujian Mao, Hongcheng Shi","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-11186-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Given that claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) is a cell surface protein specifically expressed by gastric cancer cells, anti-CLDN18.2 antibodies have demonstrated significant antitumor effects in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. The correlation of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT with CLDN18.2 expression remains unexplored. This study aimed to investigate whether CLDN18.2 expression was associated with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG uptake and whether [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT can be used to predict the CLDN18.2 status of gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT images from 163 patients diagnosed with metastatic gastric cancer was conducted, and the expression of CLDN18.2 was assessed immunohistochemically. SUV<sub>max</sub>, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were calculated in 3D mode using vendor-provided software. The relationship between PET metabolic parameters and CLDN18.2 status was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CLDN18.2-negative tumors showed a higher median SUV<sub>max</sub> of 13.2 (1.8-46.7) compared to CLDN18.2-positive tumors at 7.55 (2.3-34.8), with a significant difference (p < 0.001). The median TLG was significantly higher in CLDN18.2-negative tumors (231.6) than in CLDN18.2-positive ones (81.14), indicating greater metabolic activity (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis suggested that SUV<sub>max</sub> remained significantly correlated with the status of CLDN18.2 (p = 0.01). CLDN18.2 expression was predicted with an accuracy of 69.9% when the SUV<sub>max</sub> value of 10.9 was used as a cutoff point for analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Relatively reduced [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG uptake in metastatic gastric cancers correlates with positive CLDN18.2 expression compared to those with negative CLDN18.2 expression. [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT may be useful for predicting the CLDN18.2 status of gastric cancer and thus aid in optimal treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question The study resolves the clinical issue of determining the correlation between [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT imaging and claudin 18.2 expression in metastatic gastric cancer. Findings Claudin 18.2-positive metastatic gastric cancers exhibit relatively lower [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG uptake than negative ones. The SUV<sub>max</sub> of 10.9 moderately predicts claudin 18.2 expression. Clinical relevance [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT imaging could be a noninvasive way to predict claudin 18.2 status in metastatic gastric cancer, helping to improve personalized treatment plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11186-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Given that claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) is a cell surface protein specifically expressed by gastric cancer cells, anti-CLDN18.2 antibodies have demonstrated significant antitumor effects in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. The correlation of [18F]FDG PET/CT with CLDN18.2 expression remains unexplored. This study aimed to investigate whether CLDN18.2 expression was associated with [18F]FDG uptake and whether [18F]FDG PET/CT can be used to predict the CLDN18.2 status of gastric cancer.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of [18F]FDG PET/CT images from 163 patients diagnosed with metastatic gastric cancer was conducted, and the expression of CLDN18.2 was assessed immunohistochemically. SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were calculated in 3D mode using vendor-provided software. The relationship between PET metabolic parameters and CLDN18.2 status was analyzed.
Results: CLDN18.2-negative tumors showed a higher median SUVmax of 13.2 (1.8-46.7) compared to CLDN18.2-positive tumors at 7.55 (2.3-34.8), with a significant difference (p < 0.001). The median TLG was significantly higher in CLDN18.2-negative tumors (231.6) than in CLDN18.2-positive ones (81.14), indicating greater metabolic activity (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis suggested that SUVmax remained significantly correlated with the status of CLDN18.2 (p = 0.01). CLDN18.2 expression was predicted with an accuracy of 69.9% when the SUVmax value of 10.9 was used as a cutoff point for analysis.
Conclusion: Relatively reduced [18F]FDG uptake in metastatic gastric cancers correlates with positive CLDN18.2 expression compared to those with negative CLDN18.2 expression. [18F]FDG PET/CT may be useful for predicting the CLDN18.2 status of gastric cancer and thus aid in optimal treatment decisions.
Key points: Question The study resolves the clinical issue of determining the correlation between [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging and claudin 18.2 expression in metastatic gastric cancer. Findings Claudin 18.2-positive metastatic gastric cancers exhibit relatively lower [18F]FDG uptake than negative ones. The SUVmax of 10.9 moderately predicts claudin 18.2 expression. Clinical relevance [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging could be a noninvasive way to predict claudin 18.2 status in metastatic gastric cancer, helping to improve personalized treatment plans.
期刊介绍:
European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field.
This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies.
From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.