{"title":"Comparison of Recovery Rate of Otomycosis using One-Percent Gentian Violet and One-Percent Clotrimazole Topical Treatment.","authors":"Srijana Dhakal, Gyanendra Bagale, Ajit Nepal, Deepak Yadav, Chetan Khadka, Deepa Joshi","doi":"10.33314/jnhrc.v22i02.4885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Otomycosis is a fungal infection of external auditory canal with worldwide prevalence of 9% to 30%. Treatment includes elimination of predisposing factor, thorough canal cleaning and topical or systemic antifungal agents. Clotrimazole is a specific topical antifungal agent with effectiveness varying from 95% to 100%. Gentian violet is an aniline dye and its use as antifungal has been mentioned in literature with effectiveness up to 80%. This study was aimed at comparing the effectiveness of these two commonly used treatments in otomycosis.This is a conducted in Department of ENT-HNS, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal over one-year period after approval from institutional review committee. Patients with otomycosis were randomized into arm A and arm B group. Arm A patients were treated with one percent clotrimazole topical drops. Patients in Arm B were treated with application of one percent Gentian Violet paint. Effectiveness was measured on the basis of clinical response and recovery at end of second week. Data analysis was done with Epi Info application. Chi-square test was used and p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 90 patients were treated for otomycosis over one year. Recovery was better in clotrimazole group at second week i.e., 86.84% vs 71.43%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clotrimazole was more effective in treatment of otomycosis compared to Gentian Violet paint, though the result was not statistically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":16380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","volume":"22 2","pages":"269-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v22i02.4885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Otomycosis is a fungal infection of external auditory canal with worldwide prevalence of 9% to 30%. Treatment includes elimination of predisposing factor, thorough canal cleaning and topical or systemic antifungal agents. Clotrimazole is a specific topical antifungal agent with effectiveness varying from 95% to 100%. Gentian violet is an aniline dye and its use as antifungal has been mentioned in literature with effectiveness up to 80%. This study was aimed at comparing the effectiveness of these two commonly used treatments in otomycosis.This is a conducted in Department of ENT-HNS, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal over one-year period after approval from institutional review committee. Patients with otomycosis were randomized into arm A and arm B group. Arm A patients were treated with one percent clotrimazole topical drops. Patients in Arm B were treated with application of one percent Gentian Violet paint. Effectiveness was measured on the basis of clinical response and recovery at end of second week. Data analysis was done with Epi Info application. Chi-square test was used and p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: Total 90 patients were treated for otomycosis over one year. Recovery was better in clotrimazole group at second week i.e., 86.84% vs 71.43%.
Conclusions: Clotrimazole was more effective in treatment of otomycosis compared to Gentian Violet paint, though the result was not statistically significant.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes articles related to researches done in the field of biomedical sciences related to all the discipline of the medical sciences, medical education, public health, health care management, including ethical and social issues pertaining to health. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Editorial, Guest Editorial, Viewpoint and letter to the editor are solicited by the editorial board. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding manuscript submission and processing at JNHRC.