EFFECT OF KYPHOPLASTY ON PAIN CONTROL AND VERTEBRAL RESTORATION.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1055/a-2479-5392
Mustafa Cemil Kilinc, Baran Can Alpergin, Omer Ozpiskin, Eray Serhat Aktan, Ihsan Dogan
{"title":"EFFECT OF KYPHOPLASTY ON PAIN CONTROL AND VERTEBRAL RESTORATION.","authors":"Mustafa Cemil Kilinc, Baran Can Alpergin, Omer Ozpiskin, Eray Serhat Aktan, Ihsan Dogan","doi":"10.1055/a-2479-5392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Numerous studies have been conducted regarding vertebral restoration, development of kyphotic deformity, and pain control following balloon kyphoplasty. However, there is no consensus regarding the ideal time to perform kyphoplasty. Herein, we aimed to compare the results of treatment of different vertebral levels following early or late kyphoplasty.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between 2017 and 2022, 283 patients with single-level osteoporotic vertebral fractures were retrospectively reviewed. 100 patients who attended regular postoperative follow-ups, visual analog scale (VAS) values were recorded, and osteoporosis tests were performed were included in the study. Traumatic single-level fractures in patients with osteoporosis who were aged >60 years were included in the study. Patients with a history of malignancy, previous spinal surgery, or neurological deficits were not included in the study. A total of 50 patients underwent kyphoplasty within 3 days of sustaining the fracture (Group 1), and 50 patients underwent kyphoplasty more than 3 after sustaining the fracture (Group 2). Groups A, B, and C included fractures at the T7-T11 levels, T12-L1 levels (thoracolumbar junction), and L2-L5 levels, respectively. These groups were compared among themselves. Bilateral balloon kyphoplasty was performed under sedation in the prone position. Preoperative and postoperative VAS scores, anterior vertebral heights (AVH), and kyphotic angles (KA) were measured and recorded. The vertebral segments that underwent early and late kyphoplasty were also compared among themselves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all the patients who underwent early or late kyphoplasty, there was a significant decrease in the kyphotic angle and a significant increase in vertebral heights during the early postoperative period (p < 0.001). There was no significant change in the vertebral heights and kyphotic angle between the early and late postoperative periods (p = 0.780). Early kyphoplasty demonstrated better pain control with a greater improvement in VAS score (p < 0.001) than late kyphoplasty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Kyphoplasty plays an important role in reducing pain and ensuring early mobilization in older patients. In our study, the improvements in both symptoms and radiologic features are concrete evidences in favor of performing early kyphoplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":16544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2479-5392","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Numerous studies have been conducted regarding vertebral restoration, development of kyphotic deformity, and pain control following balloon kyphoplasty. However, there is no consensus regarding the ideal time to perform kyphoplasty. Herein, we aimed to compare the results of treatment of different vertebral levels following early or late kyphoplasty.

Patients and methods: Between 2017 and 2022, 283 patients with single-level osteoporotic vertebral fractures were retrospectively reviewed. 100 patients who attended regular postoperative follow-ups, visual analog scale (VAS) values were recorded, and osteoporosis tests were performed were included in the study. Traumatic single-level fractures in patients with osteoporosis who were aged >60 years were included in the study. Patients with a history of malignancy, previous spinal surgery, or neurological deficits were not included in the study. A total of 50 patients underwent kyphoplasty within 3 days of sustaining the fracture (Group 1), and 50 patients underwent kyphoplasty more than 3 after sustaining the fracture (Group 2). Groups A, B, and C included fractures at the T7-T11 levels, T12-L1 levels (thoracolumbar junction), and L2-L5 levels, respectively. These groups were compared among themselves. Bilateral balloon kyphoplasty was performed under sedation in the prone position. Preoperative and postoperative VAS scores, anterior vertebral heights (AVH), and kyphotic angles (KA) were measured and recorded. The vertebral segments that underwent early and late kyphoplasty were also compared among themselves.

Results: In all the patients who underwent early or late kyphoplasty, there was a significant decrease in the kyphotic angle and a significant increase in vertebral heights during the early postoperative period (p < 0.001). There was no significant change in the vertebral heights and kyphotic angle between the early and late postoperative periods (p = 0.780). Early kyphoplasty demonstrated better pain control with a greater improvement in VAS score (p < 0.001) than late kyphoplasty.

Conclusion: Kyphoplasty plays an important role in reducing pain and ensuring early mobilization in older patients. In our study, the improvements in both symptoms and radiologic features are concrete evidences in favor of performing early kyphoplasty.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
椎体成形术对疼痛控制和椎体修复的影响。
背景和目的:关于球囊椎体成形术后的椎体恢复、畸形发展和疼痛控制,已有大量研究。然而,关于实施椎体成形术的理想时间,目前还没有达成共识。在此,我们旨在比较早期或晚期进行椎体成形术后不同椎体水平的治疗效果:2017年至2022年间,我们对283例单水平骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者进行了回顾性研究。研究纳入了 100 名参加术后定期随访、记录视觉模拟量表(VAS)值并进行骨质疏松检测的患者。研究对象包括年龄大于 60 岁的骨质疏松症患者中的创伤性单发骨折患者。有恶性肿瘤、脊柱手术史或神经功能障碍的患者不在研究范围内。共有 50 名患者在骨折后 3 天内接受了椎体后凸成形术(第 1 组),50 名患者在骨折后 3 天以上接受了椎体后凸成形术(第 2 组)。A、B和C组分别包括T7-T11水平、T12-L1水平(胸腰椎交界处)和L2-L5水平的骨折。这些组别之间进行了比较。双侧球囊椎体后凸成形术在镇静状态下于俯卧位进行。测量并记录术前和术后的 VAS 评分、椎体前高度(AVH)和椎体后倾角(KA)。此外,还对接受早期和晚期椎体成形术的椎体节段进行了比较:在所有接受早期或晚期椎体成形术的患者中,术后早期椎体后凸角显著下降,椎体高度显著增加(P < 0.001)。术后早期和晚期的椎体高度和椎体后倾角没有明显变化(p = 0.780)。与晚期椎体成形术相比,早期椎体成形术的疼痛控制效果更好,VAS评分的改善幅度更大(p < 0.001):结论:椎体成形术在减轻疼痛和确保老年患者早期活动方面发挥着重要作用。在我们的研究中,症状和放射学特征的改善是支持早期进行椎体成形术的具体证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery (JNLS A) is a major publication from the world''s leading publisher in neurosurgery. JNLS A currently serves as the official organ of several national neurosurgery societies. JNLS A is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles, and technical notes covering all aspects of neurological surgery. The focus of JNLS A includes microsurgery as well as the latest minimally invasive techniques, such as stereotactic-guided surgery, endoscopy, and endovascular procedures. JNLS A covers purely neurosurgical topics.
期刊最新文献
A New Concept for Cervical Expansion Screws Using Shape Memory Alloy: A Feasibility Study. Artificial Intelligence Prediction Model of Occurrence of Cerebral Vasospasms Based on Machine Learning. Paresis of the Oculomotor Nerve due to Neurovascular Conflict with Superior Cerebellar Artery. EFFECT OF KYPHOPLASTY ON PAIN CONTROL AND VERTEBRAL RESTORATION. First experience using a new minimally invasive screw-rod system for completely percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the cervical spine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1