High-dose Intravenous N-Acetylcysteine in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Propensity-Score Matched Cohort Study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1177/08850666241299391
Ka Man Fong, George Wing Yiu Ng, Anne Kit Hung Leung, Kang Yiu Lai
{"title":"High-dose Intravenous N-Acetylcysteine in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Propensity-Score Matched Cohort Study.","authors":"Ka Man Fong, George Wing Yiu Ng, Anne Kit Hung Leung, Kang Yiu Lai","doi":"10.1177/08850666241299391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current therapies for severe COVID-19, such as steroids and immunomodulators are associated with various side effects. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has emerged as a potential adjunctive therapy with minimal side effects for patients with cytokine storm due to COVID-19. However, evidence supporting high-dose intravenous NAC in severe COVID-19 pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 who were admitted for acute respiratory failure (PaO2/FiO2 ratio <300) with SARS-CoV-2 infection to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Queen Elizabeth Hospital from fifth July 2020 to 31<sup>st</sup> October 2022. Inclusion was limited to patients who required mechanical ventilation. High-dose NAC refers to a dosage of 10 g per day. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 28 days. Propensity-score matched analysis using logistic regression was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 136 patients analyzed, 42 (40.3%) patients received NAC. The unmatched NAC patients displayed a higher day-28 mortality (12 (28.6%) versus 4 (6.5%), p = 0.005) and fewer ventilator-free days (18.5 (0-23.0) versus 22.0 (18.3-24.0), p = 0.015). No significant differences were observed in ICU and hospital length of stays among survivors. In patients who were not treated with tocilizumab, those receiving NAC exhibited a trend toward a quicker reduction in C-reactive protein compared to those who did not receive NAC.After propensity score matching which included 64 patients with 33 (51.6%) receiving NAC, no significant differences were found in 28-day mortality, ventilator-free days, or ICU and hospital length of stay. After adjusting for potential confounders, logistic regression of the propensity score-matched population did not demonstrate that the use of NAC independently affected 28-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation and receiving standard COVID-19 treatment, the addition of high-dose NAC did not lead to improved clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666241299391"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241299391","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current therapies for severe COVID-19, such as steroids and immunomodulators are associated with various side effects. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has emerged as a potential adjunctive therapy with minimal side effects for patients with cytokine storm due to COVID-19. However, evidence supporting high-dose intravenous NAC in severe COVID-19 pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation is limited.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 who were admitted for acute respiratory failure (PaO2/FiO2 ratio <300) with SARS-CoV-2 infection to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Queen Elizabeth Hospital from fifth July 2020 to 31st October 2022. Inclusion was limited to patients who required mechanical ventilation. High-dose NAC refers to a dosage of 10 g per day. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 28 days. Propensity-score matched analysis using logistic regression was performed.

Results: Among the 136 patients analyzed, 42 (40.3%) patients received NAC. The unmatched NAC patients displayed a higher day-28 mortality (12 (28.6%) versus 4 (6.5%), p = 0.005) and fewer ventilator-free days (18.5 (0-23.0) versus 22.0 (18.3-24.0), p = 0.015). No significant differences were observed in ICU and hospital length of stays among survivors. In patients who were not treated with tocilizumab, those receiving NAC exhibited a trend toward a quicker reduction in C-reactive protein compared to those who did not receive NAC.After propensity score matching which included 64 patients with 33 (51.6%) receiving NAC, no significant differences were found in 28-day mortality, ventilator-free days, or ICU and hospital length of stay. After adjusting for potential confounders, logistic regression of the propensity score-matched population did not demonstrate that the use of NAC independently affected 28-day mortality.

Conclusions: In patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation and receiving standard COVID-19 treatment, the addition of high-dose NAC did not lead to improved clinical outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 COVID-19 肺炎机械通气患者中静脉注射大剂量 N-乙酰半胱氨酸:倾向分数匹配队列研究》。
背景:目前治疗严重 COVID-19 的疗法,如类固醇和免疫调节剂,都会产生各种副作用。N-乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)已成为一种潜在的辅助疗法,对 COVID-19 引起的细胞因子风暴患者的副作用极小。然而,在需要机械通气的重症 COVID-19 肺炎患者中,支持大剂量静脉注射 NAC 的证据非常有限:我们对因急性呼吸衰竭(PaO2/FiO2 比值为 2022 年 10 月前)入院的年龄≥ 18 岁的连续患者进行了回顾性分析。纳入对象仅限于需要机械通气的患者。大剂量 NAC 指的是每天 10 克的剂量。主要研究结果为 28 天内的全因死亡率。采用逻辑回归进行倾向分数匹配分析:在分析的 136 例患者中,42 例(40.3%)接受了 NAC 治疗。未匹配的 NAC 患者在 28 天内的死亡率较高(12 (28.6%) 对 4 (6.5%),p = 0.005),无呼吸机天数较少(18.5 (0-23.0) 对 22.0 (18.3-24.0),p = 0.015)。幸存者的重症监护室和住院时间没有明显差异。在未接受托西珠单抗治疗的患者中,与未接受 NAC 治疗的患者相比,接受 NAC 治疗的患者的 C 反应蛋白有更快下降的趋势。经过倾向评分匹配(包括 64 例患者,其中 33 例(51.6%)接受 NAC 治疗)后,在 28 天死亡率、无呼吸机天数、ICU 和住院时间方面未发现显著差异。在对潜在的混杂因素进行调整后,倾向得分匹配人群的逻辑回归结果显示,NAC的使用并不会独立影响28天的死亡率:结论:对于需要机械通气并接受标准 COVID-19 治疗的 COVID-19 肺炎患者,添加大剂量 NAC 并不能改善临床预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
期刊最新文献
A Practical Guide to Biostatistics Used in the Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. Impact of Sepsis Onset Timing on All-Cause Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Serial Lactate in Clinical Medicine - A Narrative Review. A Combined Model of Vital Signs and Serum Biomarkers Outperforms Shock Index in the Prediction of Hemorrhage Control Interventions in Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients. The Effects of Inspiratory Muscle Training in Critically ill Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1