Comparative effectiveness and safety of imported and domestic immune checkpoint inhibitors in China: A systematic review and pairwise and network meta-analyses

IF 10.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacological research Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107475
Jilin Peng , Yixu Wang , Zhenye Chi , Shichao Li , Yuan Zhang , Ling Li , Di Bian , Ziyu Zhai , Sijie Yuan , Yulin Zhang , Weijie Li , Fanglei Ye , Le Wang
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness and safety of imported and domestic immune checkpoint inhibitors in China: A systematic review and pairwise and network meta-analyses","authors":"Jilin Peng ,&nbsp;Yixu Wang ,&nbsp;Zhenye Chi ,&nbsp;Shichao Li ,&nbsp;Yuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Ling Li ,&nbsp;Di Bian ,&nbsp;Ziyu Zhai ,&nbsp;Sijie Yuan ,&nbsp;Yulin Zhang ,&nbsp;Weijie Li ,&nbsp;Fanglei Ye ,&nbsp;Le Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Multiple brands of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including domestic and imported agents, have been approved as front-line therapy in China. However, little is known about the difference in efficacy and safety of these agents of different origins. This study aims to systematically compare the difference between National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) approved domestic and imported ICIs regarding their efficacy, safety, and price.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central, from inception to July 1st, 2023, for phase III trials evaluating ICIs as first- or second-line settings that have available hazard ratio (HR) for Asians or non-Asians. Studies of domestic and imported ICIs were screened and paired by the matching clinical characteristics as mirror groups. The primary endpoint was to assess the difference in efficacy between domestic and imported ICIs regarding overall survival. An effect size was derived from each mirror group and then pooled across all groups using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by <em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> statistics. Monthly treatment costs for each drug were calculated based on dosing information on National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) label and prices extracted from INSIGHT database. The difference in monthly treatment costs was compared by unpaired T-test. The protocol is registered on PROSPERO, CRD42024580753.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, domestic ICIs exhibited better efficacy regarding overall survival (HR, 0.87; 95 % CI, 0.79–0.97; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 0) compared with imported agents. No difference was observed regarding benefits in progression free survival (HR, 0.95; 95 % CI, 0.82–1.09; <em>P</em> &gt; 0.05; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 0). Consistent results were obtained through frequentists and Bayesian approaches. The differences in safety; measured by relative risk of treatment-related adverse events (TARE) of any grade, TARE of grade 3 or higher, immune-related adverse events(irAE) of any grade, irAE of grade 3 or higher, discontinuation due to treatment, and death due to treatment; were also similar between domestic and imported ICIs. Moreover, in current Chinese market, the monthly treatment prices of domestic ICIs was statistically lower than that of imported ICIs (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our research provides an essential reference of cost-effectiveness of ICIs manufactured in China for clinicians in routine practice of cancer care as well as public health authorities for decision making process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19918,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological research","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 107475"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacological research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043661824004201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Multiple brands of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including domestic and imported agents, have been approved as front-line therapy in China. However, little is known about the difference in efficacy and safety of these agents of different origins. This study aims to systematically compare the difference between National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) approved domestic and imported ICIs regarding their efficacy, safety, and price.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central, from inception to July 1st, 2023, for phase III trials evaluating ICIs as first- or second-line settings that have available hazard ratio (HR) for Asians or non-Asians. Studies of domestic and imported ICIs were screened and paired by the matching clinical characteristics as mirror groups. The primary endpoint was to assess the difference in efficacy between domestic and imported ICIs regarding overall survival. An effect size was derived from each mirror group and then pooled across all groups using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2 statistics. Monthly treatment costs for each drug were calculated based on dosing information on National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) label and prices extracted from INSIGHT database. The difference in monthly treatment costs was compared by unpaired T-test. The protocol is registered on PROSPERO, CRD42024580753.

Results

Overall, domestic ICIs exhibited better efficacy regarding overall survival (HR, 0.87; 95 % CI, 0.79–0.97; P < 0.05; I2 = 0) compared with imported agents. No difference was observed regarding benefits in progression free survival (HR, 0.95; 95 % CI, 0.82–1.09; P > 0.05; I2 = 0). Consistent results were obtained through frequentists and Bayesian approaches. The differences in safety; measured by relative risk of treatment-related adverse events (TARE) of any grade, TARE of grade 3 or higher, immune-related adverse events(irAE) of any grade, irAE of grade 3 or higher, discontinuation due to treatment, and death due to treatment; were also similar between domestic and imported ICIs. Moreover, in current Chinese market, the monthly treatment prices of domestic ICIs was statistically lower than that of imported ICIs (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Our research provides an essential reference of cost-effectiveness of ICIs manufactured in China for clinicians in routine practice of cancer care as well as public health authorities for decision making process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
进口和国产免疫检查点抑制剂在中国的有效性和安全性比较:系统综述、配对分析和网络荟萃分析。
背景:中国已批准多个品牌的免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)作为一线治疗药物,包括国产和进口药物。然而,人们对这些不同产地的药物在疗效和安全性方面的差异知之甚少。本研究旨在系统比较国家医药产品管理局(NMPA)批准的国产和进口 ICIs 在疗效、安全性和价格方面的差异:方法:我们系统地检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Central,从开始到 2023 年 7 月 1 日,评估 ICIs 作为一线或二线治疗的 III 期试验,并提供了亚洲人或非亚洲人的危险比 (HR)。对国产和进口 ICIs 的研究进行了筛选,并根据匹配的临床特征配对作为镜像组。主要终点是评估国产和进口 ICIs 在总生存期方面的疗效差异。从每个镜像组得出效应大小,然后使用随机效应模型对所有组进行汇总。异质性通过 I2 统计量进行评估。根据国家医药产品管理局(NMPA)标签上的剂量信息和 INSIGHT 数据库中的价格,计算出每种药物的每月治疗费用。每月治疗费用的差异通过非配对 T 检验进行比较。研究方案已在 PROSPERO 注册,CRD42024580753:总体而言,与进口药物相比,国产 ICIs 在总生存期方面表现出更好的疗效(HR,0.87;95% CI,0.79-0.97;P < 0.05;I2 = 0)。在无进展生存期方面没有观察到差异(HR,0.95;95% CI,0.82-1.09;P > 0.05;I2 = 0)。通过频数法和贝叶斯法得出了一致的结果。在安全性方面,国产和进口ICIs之间的差异也很相似,其衡量标准是任何级别的治疗相关不良事件(TARE)、3级或更高级别TARE、任何级别的免疫相关不良事件(irAE)、3级或更高级别irAE、因治疗而停药以及因治疗而死亡的相对风险。此外,在目前的中国市场上,国产 ICIs 的月治疗价格在统计学上低于进口 ICIs(P < 0.01):我们的研究为临床医生的常规癌症治疗实践以及公共卫生部门的决策过程提供了中国生产的 ICIs 成本效益的重要参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacological research
Pharmacological research 医学-药学
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
491
审稿时长
8 days
期刊介绍: Pharmacological Research publishes cutting-edge articles in biomedical sciences to cover a broad range of topics that move the pharmacological field forward. Pharmacological research publishes articles on molecular, biochemical, translational, and clinical research (including clinical trials); it is proud of its rapid publication of accepted papers that comprises a dedicated, fast acceptance and publication track for high profile articles.
期刊最新文献
Impaired PARP1-dependent DNA repair in MORC2 mutations drives axonal degeneration in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease subtype 2Z and spinal muscular atrophy-like neuromotor disorders Differential toll-like receptor 2 activation by Akkermansia muciniphila and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron mediates the beneficial effects of Fu brick tea polysaccharide against colitis A Mangifera indica L. Extract Functions as a Broad TLR2/4/6 Signalling Rheostat to Attenuate MyD88/NF-κB-Driven Inflammation and Macrophage Polarization. Corrigendum to "TREX1 activators: A novel therapeutic strategy for rheumatoid arthritis management via cfDNA clearance" [Pharmacol. Res. 218 (2025) 107817]. Study on epigenetic regulatory mechanism of MBD4 with a germline loss-of-function mutation (rs140693) responsible for retinoblastoma chemoresistance via the cell cycle and apoptotic pathways
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1