Yang Wang, Jiale Li, Xu Ou-Yang, Mingzhong Wan, Yan Wang, Guochao Zhang, Hang Yi
{"title":"Bridging the gap: advancing gender equality in medical research.","authors":"Yang Wang, Jiale Li, Xu Ou-Yang, Mingzhong Wan, Yan Wang, Guochao Zhang, Hang Yi","doi":"10.1093/postmj/qgae161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gender inequality in medical research persists globally, hindering scientific innovation and social equity. Despite incremental progress, women remain underrepresented in authorship, funding, and leadership roles. This review explores the extent of gender disparities, their impact, and strategies to advance equity in the field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a narrative review of studies retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, focusing on gender disparities in authorship, research funding, leadership, and editorial representation across regions and disciplines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women are consistently underrepresented in medical research, with disparities in publication rates, grant awards, and conference participation. Key barriers include implicit biases, structural inequities, and socio-cultural norms. Promising interventions, such as targeted funding policies and mentorship programs, show potential but require broader adoption and evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Addressing gender inequality in medical research demands comprehensive reforms in academic evaluation, funding systems, and institutional policies, alongside sustained efforts to challenge societal biases.</p>","PeriodicalId":20374,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgae161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Gender inequality in medical research persists globally, hindering scientific innovation and social equity. Despite incremental progress, women remain underrepresented in authorship, funding, and leadership roles. This review explores the extent of gender disparities, their impact, and strategies to advance equity in the field.
Methods: We conducted a narrative review of studies retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, focusing on gender disparities in authorship, research funding, leadership, and editorial representation across regions and disciplines.
Results: Women are consistently underrepresented in medical research, with disparities in publication rates, grant awards, and conference participation. Key barriers include implicit biases, structural inequities, and socio-cultural norms. Promising interventions, such as targeted funding policies and mentorship programs, show potential but require broader adoption and evaluation.
Conclusion: Addressing gender inequality in medical research demands comprehensive reforms in academic evaluation, funding systems, and institutional policies, alongside sustained efforts to challenge societal biases.
导言:全球医学研究中的性别不平等现象持续存在,阻碍了科学创新和社会公平。尽管取得了一些进展,但女性在著作权、资金和领导岗位上的代表性仍然不足。本综述探讨了性别差异的程度、其影响以及促进该领域公平的策略:我们对从 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar 检索到的研究进行了叙述性综述,重点关注不同地区和学科在作者、研究经费、领导力和编辑代表性方面的性别差异:结果:女性在医学研究领域的代表性一直不足,在发表论文率、获得资助和参加会议方面都存在差距。主要障碍包括隐性偏见、结构性不平等和社会文化规范。有前景的干预措施,如目标明确的资助政策和导师计划,显示出潜力,但需要更广泛的采用和评估:要解决医学研究中的性别不平等问题,需要对学术评价、资助体系和机构政策进行全面改革,同时持续努力挑战社会偏见。
期刊介绍:
Postgraduate Medical Journal is a peer reviewed journal published on behalf of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. The journal aims to support junior doctors and their teachers and contribute to the continuing professional development of all doctors by publishing papers on a wide range of topics relevant to the practicing clinician and teacher. Papers published in PMJ include those that focus on core competencies; that describe current practice and new developments in all branches of medicine; that describe relevance and impact of translational research on clinical practice; that provide background relevant to examinations; and papers on medical education and medical education research. PMJ supports CPD by providing the opportunity for doctors to publish many types of articles including original clinical research; reviews; quality improvement reports; editorials, and correspondence on clinical matters.