Policy and perceptions of pregnancy during training among residents of various subspecialties.

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Postgraduate Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1093/postmj/qgae164
Jessica C Morgan, Thomas Owens, Molly C Carmack, Alexis Braverman, Quetzal A Class
{"title":"Policy and perceptions of pregnancy during training among residents of various subspecialties.","authors":"Jessica C Morgan, Thomas Owens, Molly C Carmack, Alexis Braverman, Quetzal A Class","doi":"10.1093/postmj/qgae164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>Increased risk for adverse birth outcomes, long work hours, limited control over one's own schedule, and concern for making up time may color resident perceptions of their pregnancy during residency. We aimed to survey residents across four different specialties about their personal experiences with pregnancy during training.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Using a novel, validated, anonymous web-based survey instrument, we assessed experiences around pregnancy during residency training nation-wide. The survey was sent to 123 academic medical training programs in the fields of internal medicine (IM), pediatrics, obstetrics/gynecology (OB/GYN), and general surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 278 residents reported to have delivered, or their partner delivered, during residency. Of those, 38.1% (n = 103) were trainees in OB/GYN, 21.9% (n = 59) were in IM, 21.1% (n = 57) were in pediatrics, and 18.9% (n = 51) were surgery. Most responders (67.6%, n = 188) were 30-34 years old. We did not note birth outcome difference across specialties. OB/GYN trainees attended fewer prenatal visits [X2(6, 228) = 47.84, p < 0.001] compared with trainees in other specialties. Pediatric trainees reported to feel more supported when coordinating parental leave [X2(6, 268) = 17.17, p < 0.01], took longer leaves [X2(18, 228) = 39.68, p < 0.01], and felt perceived as more \"capable\" upon return [X2(6, 267) = 15.02, p < 0.05]. A total of 79.6% of respondents would encourage pregnancy during residency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified differences across specialties in policy and perceptions of pregnancy during training that impact residency quality of life. It is important to address disparities across specialties and ensure resident wellness.   What is already known on this topic: Pregnancy during residency training is common. Previous literature suggests physicians experience higher rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes compared with the general population. Parental leave policies for residents are limited and/or unpublished. Further, little is known about how residents feel about informing their program and co-residents of their pregnancy and how they navigate antepartum and postpartum appointments and leave. What this study adds: We conducted an anonymous, nation-wide survey of residents training in 4 major medical specialties. We examine resident perceptions of informing their program leadership and co-residents of their pregnancy or their partner's pregnancy. We also measure birth outcomes, if there was a clear parental leave policy in place, and the length of parental leave taken by residents. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy: Our findings suggest that parental leave policies need attention and clarity across medical specialties. Further, the perceived or real culture surrounding the normative occurrence of pregnancy during residency could also be improved. Despite these concerns, residents encourage others to use the time during residency to grow their families. Our findings will encourage residency programs to make improvements towards a supportive, transparent, and equitable parental leave policy and parenting culture. Research question bullet points: 1) How do residents feel when informing their program leadership and their resident peers that they are pregnant during residency training? 2) How do residents across specialties differ in their approach to parental leave? 3) Are pregnant residents given clear parental leave policies across specialties?</p>","PeriodicalId":20374,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgae164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the study: Increased risk for adverse birth outcomes, long work hours, limited control over one's own schedule, and concern for making up time may color resident perceptions of their pregnancy during residency. We aimed to survey residents across four different specialties about their personal experiences with pregnancy during training.

Study design: Using a novel, validated, anonymous web-based survey instrument, we assessed experiences around pregnancy during residency training nation-wide. The survey was sent to 123 academic medical training programs in the fields of internal medicine (IM), pediatrics, obstetrics/gynecology (OB/GYN), and general surgery.

Results: A total of 278 residents reported to have delivered, or their partner delivered, during residency. Of those, 38.1% (n = 103) were trainees in OB/GYN, 21.9% (n = 59) were in IM, 21.1% (n = 57) were in pediatrics, and 18.9% (n = 51) were surgery. Most responders (67.6%, n = 188) were 30-34 years old. We did not note birth outcome difference across specialties. OB/GYN trainees attended fewer prenatal visits [X2(6, 228) = 47.84, p < 0.001] compared with trainees in other specialties. Pediatric trainees reported to feel more supported when coordinating parental leave [X2(6, 268) = 17.17, p < 0.01], took longer leaves [X2(18, 228) = 39.68, p < 0.01], and felt perceived as more "capable" upon return [X2(6, 267) = 15.02, p < 0.05]. A total of 79.6% of respondents would encourage pregnancy during residency.

Conclusion: We identified differences across specialties in policy and perceptions of pregnancy during training that impact residency quality of life. It is important to address disparities across specialties and ensure resident wellness.   What is already known on this topic: Pregnancy during residency training is common. Previous literature suggests physicians experience higher rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes compared with the general population. Parental leave policies for residents are limited and/or unpublished. Further, little is known about how residents feel about informing their program and co-residents of their pregnancy and how they navigate antepartum and postpartum appointments and leave. What this study adds: We conducted an anonymous, nation-wide survey of residents training in 4 major medical specialties. We examine resident perceptions of informing their program leadership and co-residents of their pregnancy or their partner's pregnancy. We also measure birth outcomes, if there was a clear parental leave policy in place, and the length of parental leave taken by residents. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy: Our findings suggest that parental leave policies need attention and clarity across medical specialties. Further, the perceived or real culture surrounding the normative occurrence of pregnancy during residency could also be improved. Despite these concerns, residents encourage others to use the time during residency to grow their families. Our findings will encourage residency programs to make improvements towards a supportive, transparent, and equitable parental leave policy and parenting culture. Research question bullet points: 1) How do residents feel when informing their program leadership and their resident peers that they are pregnant during residency training? 2) How do residents across specialties differ in their approach to parental leave? 3) Are pregnant residents given clear parental leave policies across specialties?

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
各亚专科住院医师对培训期间怀孕的政策和看法。
研究目的:不良分娩后果风险增加、工作时间长、对自己日程安排的控制有限以及对补课时间的担忧可能会影响住院医师对其在住院医师培训期间怀孕的看法。我们旨在对四个不同专业的住院医师进行调查,了解他们在培训期间怀孕的个人经历:研究设计:我们使用一种新颖的、经过验证的匿名网络调查工具,在全国范围内对住院医师培训期间的怀孕经历进行了评估。调查对象包括内科(IM)、儿科、妇产科(OB/GYN)和普外科的 123 个学术医学培训项目:共有 278 名住院医师表示自己或其伴侣在住院医师培训期间分娩过。其中,38.1%(n = 103)为妇产科学员,21.9%(n = 59)为妇产科学员,21.1%(n = 57)为儿科学员,18.9%(n = 51)为外科学员。大多数回复者(67.6%,n = 188)的年龄在 30-34 岁之间。我们没有注意到不同专业之间的出生结果差异。妇产科学员参加产前检查的次数较少[X2(6,228)= 47.84,P 结论:妇产科学员参加产前检查的次数较少:我们发现各专业在培训期间对怀孕的政策和看法存在差异,这影响了住院医师的生活质量。解决各专科之间的差异并确保住院医师的健康非常重要。 关于该主题的已知信息:住院医师培训期间怀孕很常见。以往的文献表明,与普通人群相比,医生的不良妊娠结局发生率更高。针对住院医师的育儿假政策非常有限和/或未公布。此外,对于住院医师如何将自己怀孕的消息告知其项目和共同住院医师,以及他们如何安排产前和产后预约及休假,人们知之甚少。本研究的补充内容:我们在全国范围内对 4 个主要医学专科的住院医师进行了匿名调查。我们研究了住院医师对告知其项目领导和共同住院医师自己怀孕或其伴侣怀孕的看法。我们还测量了分娩结果、是否有明确的育儿假政策以及住院医生休育儿假的时间长度。本研究可能对研究、实践或政策产生的影响:我们的研究结果表明,各医学专业都需要关注和明确育儿假政策。此外,围绕住院医师在实习期间怀孕的正常发生所形成的感知或真实文化也有待改善。尽管有这些顾虑,住院医师们还是鼓励其他人利用住院实习期间的时间组建家庭。我们的研究结果将鼓励住院医师培训项目朝着支持性、透明、公平的育儿假政策和育儿文化方向做出改进。研究问题要点:1)住院医师在告知项目领导和住院医师同伴自己在住院医师培训期间怀孕时有何感受?2)不同专业的住院医师对育儿假的态度有何不同?3) 各专科对怀孕住院医师是否有明确的育儿假政策?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Postgraduate Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Postgraduate Medical Journal is a peer reviewed journal published on behalf of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. The journal aims to support junior doctors and their teachers and contribute to the continuing professional development of all doctors by publishing papers on a wide range of topics relevant to the practicing clinician and teacher. Papers published in PMJ include those that focus on core competencies; that describe current practice and new developments in all branches of medicine; that describe relevance and impact of translational research on clinical practice; that provide background relevant to examinations; and papers on medical education and medical education research. PMJ supports CPD by providing the opportunity for doctors to publish many types of articles including original clinical research; reviews; quality improvement reports; editorials, and correspondence on clinical matters.
期刊最新文献
Policy and perceptions of pregnancy during training among residents of various subspecialties. Bridging the gap: advancing gender equality in medical research. Evaluating safety and efficacy of plastic versus metal stenting in malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Screening doctors in training for dyslexia: the benefits of an inclusive screening approach. Improving senior medical workforce retention at a large teaching hospital trust.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1