John Michael Bryant , Matthew N. Mills , Casey Liveringhouse , Russell Palm , Mihaela Druta , Andrew Brohl , Damon R. Reed , Peter A. Johnstone , Justin T. Miller , Kujtim Latifi , Vladimir Feygelman , George Q. Yang , Arash O. Naghavi
{"title":"Hypofractionated accelerated radiation dose-painting (HARD) improves outcomes in unresected soft-tissue sarcoma","authors":"John Michael Bryant , Matthew N. Mills , Casey Liveringhouse , Russell Palm , Mihaela Druta , Andrew Brohl , Damon R. Reed , Peter A. Johnstone , Justin T. Miller , Kujtim Latifi , Vladimir Feygelman , George Q. Yang , Arash O. Naghavi","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are radioresistant with a low α/β, which may have a biologic benefit with hypofractionation. For unresectable STS, the dose escalation required to achieve durable control is often limited by long-term toxicity risk. We sought to compare an isotoxic approach utilizing hypofractionated accelerated radiation dose-painting (HARD) versus standard fractionated radiation therapy (SFT) in patients with unresected STS.</div><div>We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with unresected STS who received either HARD (n = 49) or SFT (n = 43) with photon-based therapy between 1990 and 2022. The 2 HARD regimens each use 3 dose levels based on risk of disease burden. The gross disease, intermediate risk, and low-risk clinical target volumes were treated with either 20–22 fractions of 3/2.5/2–2.2 Gy or 28 fractions of 2.5/2.2/1.8 Gy. SFT included patients treated with definitive intent, receiving ≥ 50 Gy in 1.8–2 Gy per fraction. Clinical endpoints included 3-year local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS), along with treatment-related toxicity.</div><div>With a median age of 67 and tumor size of 7 cm, most patients were stage IV (37 %), grade 3 (67 %), had no concurrent systemic therapy (70 %), and were lower extremity tumors (24 %). HARD cohort consisted of higher age, stage, recurrent disease, and median BED<sub>4</sub> (<em>p</em> < 0.05), when compared to SFT. With a median follow-up of 35.9 months, HARD demonstrated significant improvement in 3-year LC (96.4 % vs. 48.4 %, <em>p</em> < 0.001), compared to SFT overall, with a median PFS benefit (16 vs. 10 months, <em>p =</em> 0.037) for non-distantly metastatic patients at baseline. On multivariate analysis, HARD was significantly associated with improved LC (HR 0.058, 95 % CI 0.005–0.682, <em>p</em> = 0.024). The HARD regimen found no significant increase in toxicity, with limited acute grade 3 (24 %, all dermatitis) and late grade 3 toxicity (6 %) observed, with no grade 4 or 5 events.</div><div>HARD regimen significantly improves LC for unresectable STS without a significant increase in toxicity, when compared to a standard fractionated approach, supporting further prospective investigation of this treatment approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 110644"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024043068","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are radioresistant with a low α/β, which may have a biologic benefit with hypofractionation. For unresectable STS, the dose escalation required to achieve durable control is often limited by long-term toxicity risk. We sought to compare an isotoxic approach utilizing hypofractionated accelerated radiation dose-painting (HARD) versus standard fractionated radiation therapy (SFT) in patients with unresected STS.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with unresected STS who received either HARD (n = 49) or SFT (n = 43) with photon-based therapy between 1990 and 2022. The 2 HARD regimens each use 3 dose levels based on risk of disease burden. The gross disease, intermediate risk, and low-risk clinical target volumes were treated with either 20–22 fractions of 3/2.5/2–2.2 Gy or 28 fractions of 2.5/2.2/1.8 Gy. SFT included patients treated with definitive intent, receiving ≥ 50 Gy in 1.8–2 Gy per fraction. Clinical endpoints included 3-year local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS), along with treatment-related toxicity.
With a median age of 67 and tumor size of 7 cm, most patients were stage IV (37 %), grade 3 (67 %), had no concurrent systemic therapy (70 %), and were lower extremity tumors (24 %). HARD cohort consisted of higher age, stage, recurrent disease, and median BED4 (p < 0.05), when compared to SFT. With a median follow-up of 35.9 months, HARD demonstrated significant improvement in 3-year LC (96.4 % vs. 48.4 %, p < 0.001), compared to SFT overall, with a median PFS benefit (16 vs. 10 months, p = 0.037) for non-distantly metastatic patients at baseline. On multivariate analysis, HARD was significantly associated with improved LC (HR 0.058, 95 % CI 0.005–0.682, p = 0.024). The HARD regimen found no significant increase in toxicity, with limited acute grade 3 (24 %, all dermatitis) and late grade 3 toxicity (6 %) observed, with no grade 4 or 5 events.
HARD regimen significantly improves LC for unresectable STS without a significant increase in toxicity, when compared to a standard fractionated approach, supporting further prospective investigation of this treatment approach.
期刊介绍:
Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.