Hypofractionated accelerated radiation dose-painting (HARD) improves outcomes in unresected soft-tissue sarcoma

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Radiotherapy and Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110644
John Michael Bryant , Matthew N. Mills , Casey Liveringhouse , Russell Palm , Mihaela Druta , Andrew Brohl , Damon R. Reed , Peter A. Johnstone , Justin T. Miller , Kujtim Latifi , Vladimir Feygelman , George Q. Yang , Arash O. Naghavi
{"title":"Hypofractionated accelerated radiation dose-painting (HARD) improves outcomes in unresected soft-tissue sarcoma","authors":"John Michael Bryant ,&nbsp;Matthew N. Mills ,&nbsp;Casey Liveringhouse ,&nbsp;Russell Palm ,&nbsp;Mihaela Druta ,&nbsp;Andrew Brohl ,&nbsp;Damon R. Reed ,&nbsp;Peter A. Johnstone ,&nbsp;Justin T. Miller ,&nbsp;Kujtim Latifi ,&nbsp;Vladimir Feygelman ,&nbsp;George Q. Yang ,&nbsp;Arash O. Naghavi","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are radioresistant with a low α/β, which may have a biologic benefit with hypofractionation. For unresectable STS, the dose escalation required to achieve durable control is often limited by long-term toxicity risk. We sought to compare an isotoxic approach utilizing hypofractionated accelerated radiation dose-painting (HARD) versus standard fractionated radiation therapy (SFT) in patients with unresected STS.</div><div>We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with unresected STS who received either HARD (n = 49) or SFT (n = 43) with photon-based therapy between 1990 and 2022. The 2 HARD regimens each use 3 dose levels based on risk of disease burden. The gross disease, intermediate risk, and low-risk clinical target volumes were treated with either 20–22 fractions of 3/2.5/2–2.2 Gy or 28 fractions of 2.5/2.2/1.8 Gy. SFT included patients treated with definitive intent, receiving ≥ 50 Gy in 1.8–2 Gy per fraction. Clinical endpoints included 3-year local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS), along with treatment-related toxicity.</div><div>With a median age of 67 and tumor size of 7 cm, most patients were stage IV (37 %), grade 3 (67 %), had no concurrent systemic therapy (70 %), and were lower extremity tumors (24 %). HARD cohort consisted of higher age, stage, recurrent disease, and median BED<sub>4</sub> (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), when compared to SFT. With a median follow-up of 35.9 months, HARD demonstrated significant improvement in 3-year LC (96.4 % vs. 48.4 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), compared to SFT overall, with a median PFS benefit (16 vs. 10 months, <em>p =</em> 0.037) for non-distantly metastatic patients at baseline. On multivariate analysis, HARD was significantly associated with improved LC (HR 0.058, 95 % CI 0.005–0.682, <em>p</em> = 0.024). The HARD regimen found no significant increase in toxicity, with limited acute grade 3 (24 %, all dermatitis) and late grade 3 toxicity (6 %) observed, with no grade 4 or 5 events.</div><div>HARD regimen significantly improves LC for unresectable STS without a significant increase in toxicity, when compared to a standard fractionated approach, supporting further prospective investigation of this treatment approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 110644"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024043068","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are radioresistant with a low α/β, which may have a biologic benefit with hypofractionation. For unresectable STS, the dose escalation required to achieve durable control is often limited by long-term toxicity risk. We sought to compare an isotoxic approach utilizing hypofractionated accelerated radiation dose-painting (HARD) versus standard fractionated radiation therapy (SFT) in patients with unresected STS.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with unresected STS who received either HARD (n = 49) or SFT (n = 43) with photon-based therapy between 1990 and 2022. The 2 HARD regimens each use 3 dose levels based on risk of disease burden. The gross disease, intermediate risk, and low-risk clinical target volumes were treated with either 20–22 fractions of 3/2.5/2–2.2 Gy or 28 fractions of 2.5/2.2/1.8 Gy. SFT included patients treated with definitive intent, receiving ≥ 50 Gy in 1.8–2 Gy per fraction. Clinical endpoints included 3-year local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS), along with treatment-related toxicity.
With a median age of 67 and tumor size of 7 cm, most patients were stage IV (37 %), grade 3 (67 %), had no concurrent systemic therapy (70 %), and were lower extremity tumors (24 %). HARD cohort consisted of higher age, stage, recurrent disease, and median BED4 (p < 0.05), when compared to SFT. With a median follow-up of 35.9 months, HARD demonstrated significant improvement in 3-year LC (96.4 % vs. 48.4 %, p < 0.001), compared to SFT overall, with a median PFS benefit (16 vs. 10 months, p = 0.037) for non-distantly metastatic patients at baseline. On multivariate analysis, HARD was significantly associated with improved LC (HR 0.058, 95 % CI 0.005–0.682, p = 0.024). The HARD regimen found no significant increase in toxicity, with limited acute grade 3 (24 %, all dermatitis) and late grade 3 toxicity (6 %) observed, with no grade 4 or 5 events.
HARD regimen significantly improves LC for unresectable STS without a significant increase in toxicity, when compared to a standard fractionated approach, supporting further prospective investigation of this treatment approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低分缩加速放射剂量喷涂(HARD)可改善未切除软组织肉瘤的治疗效果。
软组织肉瘤(STS)具有放射性耐药性,α/β值较低,低剂量治疗可能会带来生物益处。对于无法切除的STS,为达到持久控制所需的剂量升级往往受到长期毒性风险的限制。我们试图比较利用低分次加速放射剂量喷涂(HARD)与标准分次放射治疗(SFT)的等毒方法对无法切除的 STS 患者的治疗效果。我们对 1990 年至 2022 年间接受过 HARD(49 人)或 SFT(43 人)光子疗法的未切除 STS 患者进行了回顾性分析。根据疾病负担的风险,2 种 HARD 方案各使用 3 个剂量等级。重大疾病、中度风险和低度风险临床靶体积采用 20-22 次 3/2.5/2-2.2 Gy 或 28 次 2.5/2.2/1.8 Gy 治疗。SFT包括以确定性意图接受治疗的患者,每分次接受≥ 50 Gy,每次1.8-2 Gy。临床终点包括3年局部控制(LC)、总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)以及治疗相关毒性。中位年龄为 67 岁,肿瘤大小为 7 厘米,大多数患者为 IV 期(37%)、3 级(67%)、未同时接受全身治疗(70%)和下肢肿瘤(24%)。HARD 队列中年龄、分期、复发疾病和中位 BED4 均较高(P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Radiotherapy and Oncology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.
期刊最新文献
A critical reflection of radiotherapy on osseous free flaps in mandibular segmental resection and immediate reconstruction in locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma: A cohort study Intensity-modulated proton therapy versus volumetric-modulated ARC therapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A long-term, multicenter cohort study. Prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Contents International collaboration of neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: The INTERNEO individual patient data pooled analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1