Comparison of a chemiluminescence immunoassay with LC–MS/MS in the determination of the plasma aldosterone concentration in patients with impaired renal function

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Steroids Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.steroids.2024.109540
Qiurong Zeng , Junlong Li , Yi Yang, Yifan He, Ying Song, Jinbo Hu, Yue Wang, Qifu Li, Shumin Yang, on behalf of the Chongqing Primary Aldosteronism Study CONPASS Group
{"title":"Comparison of a chemiluminescence immunoassay with LC–MS/MS in the determination of the plasma aldosterone concentration in patients with impaired renal function","authors":"Qiurong Zeng ,&nbsp;Junlong Li ,&nbsp;Yi Yang,&nbsp;Yifan He,&nbsp;Ying Song,&nbsp;Jinbo Hu,&nbsp;Yue Wang,&nbsp;Qifu Li,&nbsp;Shumin Yang,&nbsp;on behalf of the Chongqing Primary Aldosteronism Study CONPASS Group","doi":"10.1016/j.steroids.2024.109540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Compared with chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), the quantification of the plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) via liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) yields lower values. The extent to which this difference is exacerbated by a reduced glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is unclear. Therefore, this study aims to assess the impact of renal insufficiency on PAC as measured by CLIA using LC–MS/MS as the reference method.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In subjects with a normal or reduced estimated eGFR, the PAC was measured using both LC–MS/MS and two different CLIA kits (Mindray and Liaison).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 383 patients were included in our study. Among them, 71 subjects had eGFRs &gt; 90 (Group one), 79 had eGFRs range from 60 to 89 (Group two), 108 had eGFR range from 30 to 59 (Group three), 51 had eGFRs range from 15 to 29 (Group four), and 74 had eGFRs &lt; 15 (Group five) ml/min per 1.73 m<sup>2</sup>. In all the subjects, PAC as measured by CLIA [68.2 (37.1–122.1) pg/ml for Mindray, 109.0 (68.1–170.0) pg/ml for Liaison] were significantly higher than those measured by LC–MS/MS [47.2 (22.9–88.7) pg/ml]. PAC as measured by CLIA was positively correlated with PAC as measured by LC–MS/MS, but the correlation coefficient gradually decreased as eGFR decreased. Between the LC–MS/MS and Liaison CLIA kits, the difference in PAC values increased with reduced eGFR in groups one through five (76.8 %, 69.2 %, 113.2 %, 152.2 %, and 476.2 % for groups one through five, respectively). However, this difference increased only in Group five with the Mindray CLIA kit (46.4 %, 48.1 %, 45.7 %, 45.0 %, and 74.9 % for groups one through five, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CLIA progressively overestimated PAC as eGFR decreased, particularly with the Liaison method, indicating the need for caution when interpreting these measurements in patients with impaired renal function. In patients with impaired renal function, LC‒MS/MS measurements for PAC are preferable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21997,"journal":{"name":"Steroids","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 109540"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Steroids","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039128X24001788","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Compared with chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), the quantification of the plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) via liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) yields lower values. The extent to which this difference is exacerbated by a reduced glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is unclear. Therefore, this study aims to assess the impact of renal insufficiency on PAC as measured by CLIA using LC–MS/MS as the reference method.

Methods

In subjects with a normal or reduced estimated eGFR, the PAC was measured using both LC–MS/MS and two different CLIA kits (Mindray and Liaison).

Results

In total, 383 patients were included in our study. Among them, 71 subjects had eGFRs > 90 (Group one), 79 had eGFRs range from 60 to 89 (Group two), 108 had eGFR range from 30 to 59 (Group three), 51 had eGFRs range from 15 to 29 (Group four), and 74 had eGFRs < 15 (Group five) ml/min per 1.73 m2. In all the subjects, PAC as measured by CLIA [68.2 (37.1–122.1) pg/ml for Mindray, 109.0 (68.1–170.0) pg/ml for Liaison] were significantly higher than those measured by LC–MS/MS [47.2 (22.9–88.7) pg/ml]. PAC as measured by CLIA was positively correlated with PAC as measured by LC–MS/MS, but the correlation coefficient gradually decreased as eGFR decreased. Between the LC–MS/MS and Liaison CLIA kits, the difference in PAC values increased with reduced eGFR in groups one through five (76.8 %, 69.2 %, 113.2 %, 152.2 %, and 476.2 % for groups one through five, respectively). However, this difference increased only in Group five with the Mindray CLIA kit (46.4 %, 48.1 %, 45.7 %, 45.0 %, and 74.9 % for groups one through five, respectively).

Conclusion

CLIA progressively overestimated PAC as eGFR decreased, particularly with the Liaison method, indicating the need for caution when interpreting these measurements in patients with impaired renal function. In patients with impaired renal function, LC‒MS/MS measurements for PAC are preferable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化学发光免疫测定法与 LC-MS/MS 在测定肾功能受损患者血浆醛固酮浓度方面的比较。
目的:与化学发光免疫分析法(CLIA)相比,通过液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)对血浆醛固酮浓度(PAC)进行定量得出的数值较低。这种差异因肾小球滤过率(eGFR)降低而加剧的程度尚不清楚。因此,本研究以 LC-MS/MS 为参照方法,评估肾功能不全对 CLIA 测量的 PAC 的影响:方法:在估计 eGFR 正常或降低的受试者中,使用 LC-MS/MS 和两种不同的 CLIA 试剂盒(Mindray 和 Liaison)测量 PAC:结果:共有 383 名患者参与了我们的研究。其中,71 例患者的 eGFR 值大于 90(第一组),79 例患者的 eGFR 值在 60 至 89 之间(第二组),108 例患者的 eGFR 值在 30 至 59 之间(第三组),51 例患者的 eGFR 值在 15 至 29 之间(第四组),74 例患者的 eGFR 值为 2。在所有受试者中,CLIA 测定的 PAC [Mindray 为 68.2 (37.1-122.1) pg/ml,Liaison 为 109.0 (68.1-170.0) pg/ml]明显高于 LC-MS/MS 测定的 PAC [47.2 (22.9-88.7) pg/ml]。CLIA 测定的 PAC 与 LC-MS/MS 测定的 PAC 呈正相关,但随着 eGFR 的降低,相关系数逐渐降低。在 LC-MS/MS 和 Liaison CLIA 检测试剂盒之间,第一至第五组的 PAC 值差异随着 eGFR 的降低而增大(第一至第五组分别为 76.8%、69.2%、113.2%、152.2% 和 476.2%)。然而,这一差异仅在使用明德CLIA试剂盒的第五组中有所扩大(第一至第五组分别为46.4%、48.1%、45.7%、45.0%和74.9%):结论:随着 eGFR 的下降,CLIA 会逐渐高估 PAC,尤其是使用 Liaison 方法,这表明在肾功能受损的患者中解释这些测量结果时需要谨慎。最好采用 LC-MS/MS 测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Steroids
Steroids 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
120
审稿时长
73 days
期刊介绍: STEROIDS is an international research journal devoted to studies on all chemical and biological aspects of steroidal moieties. The journal focuses on both experimental and theoretical studies on the biology, chemistry, biosynthesis, metabolism, molecular biology, physiology and pharmacology of steroids and other molecules that target or regulate steroid receptors. Manuscripts presenting clinical research related to steroids, steroid drug development, comparative endocrinology of steroid hormones, investigations on the mechanism of steroid action and steroid chemistry are all appropriate for submission for peer review. STEROIDS publishes both original research and timely reviews. For details concerning the preparation of manuscripts see Instructions to Authors, which is published in each issue of the journal.
期刊最新文献
PTX3 impairs granulosa cell function by promoting the secretion of inflammatory cytokines in M1 macrophages via the JAK pathway. Editorial Board Comparison of a chemiluminescence immunoassay with LC–MS/MS in the determination of the plasma aldosterone concentration in patients with impaired renal function Unraveling the impact of semaglutide in a diabetic rat model of testicular dysfunction: Insights into spermatogenesis pathways and miRNA-148a-5p Ascorbic acid Mitigates behavioural disturbances associated with letrozole-induced PCOS via switching-off JAK2/STAT5 and JAK2/ERK1/2 pathways in rat hippocampus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1