Investigation of pain activity patterns, disability, body awareness, proprioception and function in individuals with and without lumbar spinal decompression surgery.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2024.2432466
Fatih Özden, İsmet Tümtürk, Mehmet Şimşek, İsmail Uysal, Ferdi Başkurt
{"title":"Investigation of pain activity patterns, disability, body awareness, proprioception and function in individuals with and without lumbar spinal decompression surgery.","authors":"Fatih Özden, İsmet Tümtürk, Mehmet Şimşek, İsmail Uysal, Ferdi Başkurt","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2024.2432466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Further studies are necessary to sustain the efficacy of decompression interventions and to identify the optimal rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare pain activity patterns, disability, body awareness, proprioception, function in individuals post and pre-lumbar decompression surgery and to reveal intergroup relationships.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study was conducted with a total of 83 participants. Fifty participants were in the operated individuals' group (OI) and 33 participants were in the pre operativeindividuals' group (POI). Participants in OI and POI were assessed one time. The mean duration after surgery was 18.6 months in OI. Participants were evaluated with the Body Awareness Questionnaire (BAQ), the Patterns of Activity Measure-Pain (POAM-P), the Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (mOSW), lumbar joint proprioception, lower extremity stepping reaction time and the 3 Meter Backward Walking Test (3MBWT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Symptom duration was longer in OI (<i>p</i> < .05). Avoidance and pacing scores were higher in the OI (p<sub>1</sub> = 0.003, p<sub>2</sub> = 0.001). In the OI, proprioception and 3MBWT were moderately correlated with BAQ (r<sub>1</sub>= -0.465, r<sub>2</sub>= -0.297, p<sub>1</sub> = 0.0007, p<sub>2</sub> = 0.036). Avoidance and overdoing were weakly correlated with left lower extremity stepping reaction time (r<sub>1</sub> = 0.33, r<sub>2</sub>= -0.321, p<sub>1</sub> = 0.019, p<sub>2</sub> = 0.023). Pacing had a weak correlation with the right lower extremity stepping reaction time (<i>r</i> = 0.324, <i>p</i> = .022). 3MBWT and left lower extremity stepping reaction time were moderately correlated with mOSW (r<sub>1</sub> = 0.413, r<sub>2</sub> = 0.43, p<sub>1</sub> = 0.003, p<sub>2</sub> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Avoidance and pacing behaviors were higher in the surgical group. Avoidance, overdoing, and pacing behaviors were associated with reaction time. Body awareness correlates with proprioception and function.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2432466","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Further studies are necessary to sustain the efficacy of decompression interventions and to identify the optimal rehabilitation.

Aim: To compare pain activity patterns, disability, body awareness, proprioception, function in individuals post and pre-lumbar decompression surgery and to reveal intergroup relationships.

Methods: The present study was conducted with a total of 83 participants. Fifty participants were in the operated individuals' group (OI) and 33 participants were in the pre operativeindividuals' group (POI). Participants in OI and POI were assessed one time. The mean duration after surgery was 18.6 months in OI. Participants were evaluated with the Body Awareness Questionnaire (BAQ), the Patterns of Activity Measure-Pain (POAM-P), the Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (mOSW), lumbar joint proprioception, lower extremity stepping reaction time and the 3 Meter Backward Walking Test (3MBWT).

Results: Symptom duration was longer in OI (p < .05). Avoidance and pacing scores were higher in the OI (p1 = 0.003, p2 = 0.001). In the OI, proprioception and 3MBWT were moderately correlated with BAQ (r1= -0.465, r2= -0.297, p1 = 0.0007, p2 = 0.036). Avoidance and overdoing were weakly correlated with left lower extremity stepping reaction time (r1 = 0.33, r2= -0.321, p1 = 0.019, p2 = 0.023). Pacing had a weak correlation with the right lower extremity stepping reaction time (r = 0.324, p = .022). 3MBWT and left lower extremity stepping reaction time were moderately correlated with mOSW (r1 = 0.413, r2 = 0.43, p1 = 0.003, p2 = 0.002).

Conclusion: Avoidance and pacing behaviors were higher in the surgical group. Avoidance, overdoing, and pacing behaviors were associated with reaction time. Body awareness correlates with proprioception and function.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查腰椎减压手术患者和未接受腰椎减压手术患者的疼痛活动模式、残疾情况、身体意识、本体感觉和功能。
背景:有必要开展进一步研究,以维持减压干预措施的疗效,并确定最佳康复方案:目的:比较腰椎减压术后和腰椎减压术前患者的疼痛活动模式、残疾程度、身体知觉、本体感觉和功能,并揭示组间关系:本研究共有 83 人参加。方法:本研究共有 83 名参与者,其中 50 人属于腰椎减压术后组(OI),33 人属于腰椎减压术前组(POI)。OI组和POI组的参与者均接受了一次评估。OI 组的平均术后时间为 18.6 个月。参与者接受了身体意识问卷(BAQ)、活动模式测量-疼痛(POAM-P)、改良Oswestry腰痛残疾问卷(mOSW)、腰椎关节本体感觉、下肢踏步反应时间和3米后向步行测试(3MBWT)的评估:结果:OI 患者的症状持续时间更长(P1 = 0.003,P2 = 0.001)。在 OI 中,本体感觉和 3MBWT 与 BAQ 呈中度相关(r1=-0.465,r2=-0.297,p1=0.0007,p2=0.036)。回避和过度与左下肢踏步反应时间呈弱相关(r1=0.33,r2=-0.321,p1=0.019,p2=0.023)。起搏与右下肢踏步反应时间的相关性较弱(r = 0.324,p = 0.022)。3MBWT 和左下肢迈步反应时间与 mOSW 呈中度相关(r1 = 0.413,r2 = 0.43,p1 = 0.003,p2 = 0.002):结论:手术组的回避和踱步行为较多。回避、过度和踱步行为与反应时间有关。身体意识与本体感觉和功能相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of pain activity patterns, disability, body awareness, proprioception and function in individuals with and without lumbar spinal decompression surgery. Variation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis presentation and outcomes based on phenotype and physical therapy movement system diagnosis: a case series. The prevalence, characteristics, and associated factors of pain in individuals with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Association between varus thrust and foot alignment and flexibility in knee osteoarthritis. Fear of movement interacts with trunk mobility, and pain intensity to predict disability in patients with chronic low back pain: a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1