Sarah Kathleen Schmidt, Judith Dexheimer, Joe Zorc, Chella Palmer, Theron Charles Casper, Kristin Stukus, Michelle Pickett, Cynthia Mollen, Cara Elsholz, Andrea T Cruz, Erin Augustine, Monika Goyal, Jennifer L Reed
{"title":"Multisite implementation of a sexual health survey and clinical decision support to promote adolescent sexually transmitted infection screening.","authors":"Sarah Kathleen Schmidt, Judith Dexheimer, Joe Zorc, Chella Palmer, Theron Charles Casper, Kristin Stukus, Michelle Pickett, Cynthia Mollen, Cara Elsholz, Andrea T Cruz, Erin Augustine, Monika Goyal, Jennifer L Reed","doi":"10.1055/a-2480-4628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adolescents are at high risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and frequently present to emergency departments (EDs) for care. Screening for STIs using confidential patient-reported outcomes represents an ideal use of electronic screening methodology.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this study were to implement a patient-facing, confidential electronic survey to assess adolescent risk for STIs and consent for testing with integrated provider facing electronic clinical decision support (CDS) across six geographically dispersed pediatric EDs and evaluate implementation based on survey and CDS usage metrics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pilot site provided code for the electronic survey, data query, and CDS templates to six EDs. Institutions identified necessary information technology (IT) personnel, completed local build, and made modifications to suit individual site workflow variations with all sites successfully deploying the electronic survey with electronic health record (EHR) -embedded CDS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>6,165 adolescents completed the confidential health survey between April 12, 2021 - September 25, 2022 out of 79,780 eligible adolescents. The CDS was triggered indicating the patient was at-risk or consented to STI testing across all six sites 2,058 times. The average percentage of time the CDS was acknowledged by a provider was 81.6% (range 45.7% - 97.6%). The median number of providers who acknowledged each instance of the CDS was 2.0. STI testing was ordered from the CDS on average 47.3% of the time. CDS acknowledge selections of \"other\" and \"[testing] already ordered\" were the most frequent indications STI testing was not ordered from the CDS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Successful deployment of patient-facing screeners with integrated electronic CDS across multiple healthcare institutions is feasible. A combination of different types of IT and informatics expertise combined with local knowledge of clinical workflows is essential to success.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2480-4628","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Adolescents are at high risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and frequently present to emergency departments (EDs) for care. Screening for STIs using confidential patient-reported outcomes represents an ideal use of electronic screening methodology.
Objectives: The objectives of this study were to implement a patient-facing, confidential electronic survey to assess adolescent risk for STIs and consent for testing with integrated provider facing electronic clinical decision support (CDS) across six geographically dispersed pediatric EDs and evaluate implementation based on survey and CDS usage metrics.
Methods: A pilot site provided code for the electronic survey, data query, and CDS templates to six EDs. Institutions identified necessary information technology (IT) personnel, completed local build, and made modifications to suit individual site workflow variations with all sites successfully deploying the electronic survey with electronic health record (EHR) -embedded CDS.
Results: 6,165 adolescents completed the confidential health survey between April 12, 2021 - September 25, 2022 out of 79,780 eligible adolescents. The CDS was triggered indicating the patient was at-risk or consented to STI testing across all six sites 2,058 times. The average percentage of time the CDS was acknowledged by a provider was 81.6% (range 45.7% - 97.6%). The median number of providers who acknowledged each instance of the CDS was 2.0. STI testing was ordered from the CDS on average 47.3% of the time. CDS acknowledge selections of "other" and "[testing] already ordered" were the most frequent indications STI testing was not ordered from the CDS.
Conclusions: Successful deployment of patient-facing screeners with integrated electronic CDS across multiple healthcare institutions is feasible. A combination of different types of IT and informatics expertise combined with local knowledge of clinical workflows is essential to success.
期刊介绍:
ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.