Uniformity test in three-dimensional rotational angiography: Novel tools and methods for advanced performance evaluation.

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiography Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2024.10.030
H M G Saraswati, L E Lubis
{"title":"Uniformity test in three-dimensional rotational angiography: Novel tools and methods for advanced performance evaluation.","authors":"H M G Saraswati, L E Lubis","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.10.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group (TG) 238 provides guidance on quality control procedures to ensuring optimal three-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA) image quality. The uniformity test outlined in this guideline utilizes a sampling method, which provide limited information on image uniformity and has been found to be a sub-optimum predictor of image quality issues. Despite this limitation, numerous automated quality control software solutions for uniformity testing have been developed using the available method. Therefore, this study was aimed to propose new methods as well as to develop an in-house software to generate more comprehensive uniformity testing of 3DRA images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The uniformity evaluation techniques are adopted from both AAPM TG-238 guidelines and the European Reference Organisation for Quality Assured Breast Screening and Diagnostic Services (EUREF) guidelines. The parameters assessed included mean pixel value (MPV) and signal to noise ratio (SNR) following EUREF recommendations with limiting values adapted from AAPM TG-238. An in-house software was constructed to visually display non-uniformities and numerically by providing information on ROIs detected by each metric.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With the introduction of new evaluation methods, the previously established limiting values could not be employed as a reference for determining image uniformity. Therefore, the selection of the optimal uniformity testing method will be based on its sensitivity in detecting and visually displaying non-uniformities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new evaluation techniques provide a more comprehensive assessment of 3DRA image uniformity. However, further investigation is reserved to refine the limitation values used in determining the pass/fail criteria for the uniformity test.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>This in-house software enables visualization of uniformity within an image, aiding in the selection of the appropriate imaging mode based on clinical requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 1","pages":"146-151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2024.10.030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group (TG) 238 provides guidance on quality control procedures to ensuring optimal three-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA) image quality. The uniformity test outlined in this guideline utilizes a sampling method, which provide limited information on image uniformity and has been found to be a sub-optimum predictor of image quality issues. Despite this limitation, numerous automated quality control software solutions for uniformity testing have been developed using the available method. Therefore, this study was aimed to propose new methods as well as to develop an in-house software to generate more comprehensive uniformity testing of 3DRA images.

Methods: The uniformity evaluation techniques are adopted from both AAPM TG-238 guidelines and the European Reference Organisation for Quality Assured Breast Screening and Diagnostic Services (EUREF) guidelines. The parameters assessed included mean pixel value (MPV) and signal to noise ratio (SNR) following EUREF recommendations with limiting values adapted from AAPM TG-238. An in-house software was constructed to visually display non-uniformities and numerically by providing information on ROIs detected by each metric.

Results: With the introduction of new evaluation methods, the previously established limiting values could not be employed as a reference for determining image uniformity. Therefore, the selection of the optimal uniformity testing method will be based on its sensitivity in detecting and visually displaying non-uniformities.

Conclusion: The new evaluation techniques provide a more comprehensive assessment of 3DRA image uniformity. However, further investigation is reserved to refine the limitation values used in determining the pass/fail criteria for the uniformity test.

Implications for practice: This in-house software enables visualization of uniformity within an image, aiding in the selection of the appropriate imaging mode based on clinical requirements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三维旋转血管造影的均匀性测试:先进性能评估的新工具和新方法。
导言:美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)第 238 工作组(TG)为质量控制程序提供指导,以确保最佳的三维旋转血管造影(3DRA)图像质量。该指南中概述的均匀性测试使用的是抽样方法,这种方法只能提供有限的图像均匀性信息,而且已被发现不是预测图像质量问题的最佳方法。尽管存在这一局限性,但仍有许多自动质量控制软件解决方案利用现有方法进行了均匀性测试。因此,本研究旨在提出新的方法,并开发一款内部软件,对 3DRA 图像进行更全面的均匀性测试:均匀性评估技术采用了 AAPM TG-238 指南和欧洲质量保证乳腺筛查和诊断服务参考组织 (EUREF) 指南。评估的参数包括平均像素值 (MPV) 和信噪比 (SNR),均遵循 EUREF 的建议,而极限值则参照 AAPM TG-238 的规定。我们开发了一款内部软件来直观显示非均匀性,并通过提供每个指标检测到的 ROI 的信息来计算非均匀性:结果:随着新评估方法的引入,以前确定的极限值不能作为确定图像均匀性的参考。因此,选择最佳的均匀性检测方法将基于其在检测和直观显示非均匀性方面的灵敏度:结论:新的评估技术能更全面地评估 3DRA 图像的均匀性。结论:新的评估技术能更全面地评估 3DRA 图像的均匀性,但仍需进一步研究,以完善用于确定均匀性测试通过/失败标准的限制值:这款内部软件可实现图像内均匀性的可视化,有助于根据临床要求选择合适的成像模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
期刊最新文献
"I used their criticisms as my weapon to succeed" Experiences in the dual learning environment of Black, Asian, and ethnically diverse therapeutic radiographer undergraduate students - results of a UK survey. Radiographers' perspective of patient safety at ultrasound units in radiology departments. Uniformity test in three-dimensional rotational angiography: Novel tools and methods for advanced performance evaluation. Co-production of a novel intervention targeting obesity-related barriers to mammographic screening participation. Communicating the risk of recall in mammography screening - Enskilment in breast radiography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1