Experience of childhood adversity and maladaptive personality traits: Magnitude and specificity of the association in a clinical sample of adult outpatients.
Valeria Deiana, Federico Suprani, Pasquale Paribello, Andrea Mura, Carlo Arzedi, Mario Garzilli, Laura Arru, Mirko Manchia, Bernardo Carpiniello, Federica Pinna
{"title":"Experience of childhood adversity and maladaptive personality traits: Magnitude and specificity of the association in a clinical sample of adult outpatients.","authors":"Valeria Deiana, Federico Suprani, Pasquale Paribello, Andrea Mura, Carlo Arzedi, Mario Garzilli, Laura Arru, Mirko Manchia, Bernardo Carpiniello, Federica Pinna","doi":"10.1002/pmh.1643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relationship between the experience of childhood adversity (CA) and the development of personality disorders (PDs) has been well documented. The dimensional PD alternative model (AMPD) has been introduced in nosography in 2013, and so far it is been used for CA research mostly on non-clinical samples. We included in our study 137 psychiatric outpatients who were screened for history of maternal antipathy (MA), paternal antipathy (PA), maternal neglect (MN), paternal neglect (PN), maternal physical abuse (MPA), paternal physical abuse (PPA) and sexual abuse (SA) using the Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse Questionnaire (CECA.Q) and underwent personality assessment using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Applying CECA.Q cut-off scores, rates of participants reporting CA were as follows: 14.6% MA; 13.9% PA; 13.1% MN; 10.2% PN; 25.5% MPA; 24.8% PPA; and 22.6% SA. In multivariate regression models, accounting for age, gender and exposure to other types of CA, exposure to MA was associated with increased negative affect, detachment, disinhibition and psychoticism; exposure to PA with increased disinhibition; and exposure to SA with increased antagonism, disinhibition and psychoticism. All effect sizes were small, except for a moderate effect of SA on psychoticism. Results pointed to a small but specific and independent effect of MA on most maladaptive personality traits; a possible specific role of the paternal figure for externalizing traits; and a moderate effect of SA on psychoticism. The cumulative exposure to multiple CAs significantly predicted all maladaptive personality traits, with much larger effect sizes compared to those calculated for single CAs. CA explained the higher proportion of variance for antagonism and psychoticism. In conclusion, exposure to specific forms of childhood abuse was associated with specific maladaptive traits in psychiatric outpatients, even if the effect of cumulative multiple CAs was larger.</p>","PeriodicalId":46871,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Mental Health","volume":"19 1","pages":"e1643"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1643","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The relationship between the experience of childhood adversity (CA) and the development of personality disorders (PDs) has been well documented. The dimensional PD alternative model (AMPD) has been introduced in nosography in 2013, and so far it is been used for CA research mostly on non-clinical samples. We included in our study 137 psychiatric outpatients who were screened for history of maternal antipathy (MA), paternal antipathy (PA), maternal neglect (MN), paternal neglect (PN), maternal physical abuse (MPA), paternal physical abuse (PPA) and sexual abuse (SA) using the Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse Questionnaire (CECA.Q) and underwent personality assessment using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Applying CECA.Q cut-off scores, rates of participants reporting CA were as follows: 14.6% MA; 13.9% PA; 13.1% MN; 10.2% PN; 25.5% MPA; 24.8% PPA; and 22.6% SA. In multivariate regression models, accounting for age, gender and exposure to other types of CA, exposure to MA was associated with increased negative affect, detachment, disinhibition and psychoticism; exposure to PA with increased disinhibition; and exposure to SA with increased antagonism, disinhibition and psychoticism. All effect sizes were small, except for a moderate effect of SA on psychoticism. Results pointed to a small but specific and independent effect of MA on most maladaptive personality traits; a possible specific role of the paternal figure for externalizing traits; and a moderate effect of SA on psychoticism. The cumulative exposure to multiple CAs significantly predicted all maladaptive personality traits, with much larger effect sizes compared to those calculated for single CAs. CA explained the higher proportion of variance for antagonism and psychoticism. In conclusion, exposure to specific forms of childhood abuse was associated with specific maladaptive traits in psychiatric outpatients, even if the effect of cumulative multiple CAs was larger.
童年逆境(CA)经历与人格障碍(PD)发展之间的关系已有大量文献记载。维度人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)于2013年被引入分类学,迄今为止,该模型主要用于非临床样本的人格障碍研究。我们在研究中纳入了137名精神科门诊患者,这些患者使用童年照顾和虐待经历问卷(CECA.Q)筛查了母亲反感(MA)、父亲反感(PA)、母亲忽视(MN)、父亲忽视(PN)、母亲身体虐待(MPA)、父亲身体虐待(PPA)和性虐待(SA)史,并使用DSM-5人格量表进行了人格评估。根据 CECA.Q 临界分数,报告 CA 的参与者比例如下:14.6%为MA;13.9%为PA;13.1%为MN;10.2%为PN;25.5%为MPA;24.8%为PPA;22.6%为SA。在多变量回归模型中,考虑到年龄、性别和接触其他类型 CA 的情况,接触 MA 与负面情绪、疏离、抑制和精神病性增加有关;接触 PA 与抑制增加有关;接触 SA 与对抗、抑制和精神病性增加有关。除了 SA 对精神错乱有中等程度的影响外,其他影响都很小。结果表明,MA 对大多数适应不良人格特质的影响较小,但具有特异性和独立性;父亲形象对外化人格特质可能具有特异性作用;SA 对精神病性具有中等程度的影响。与单个CA相比,多个CA的累积暴露对所有适应不良人格特质都有显著的预测作用,且效应大小更大。CA 对对抗性和精神病性的解释变异比例较高。总之,在精神病门诊患者中,遭受特定形式的童年虐待与特定的适应不良特质有关,即使累积多重虐待的影响更大。
期刊介绍:
Personality and Mental Health: Multidisciplinary Studies from Personality Dysfunction to Criminal Behaviour aims to lead and shape the international field in this rapidly expanding area, uniting three distinct literatures: DSM-IV/ICD-10 defined personality disorders, psychopathy and offending behaviour. Through its multi-disciplinary and service orientated approach, Personality and Mental Health provides a peer-reviewed, authoritative resource for researchers, practitioners and policy makers working in the areas of personality and mental health.