[Effects of Dexamethasone Reduction on Chemotherapy Prophylactic Antiemetic Therapy for Gastrointestinal Cancer under Dexamethasone Supply Difficulties during COVID-19].

Q4 Medicine Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2024-10-01
Satoko Arai, Saki Oida, Akio Murakami, Keiichi Koido, Nobuhisa Teranishi, Takahiro Gunji
{"title":"[Effects of Dexamethasone Reduction on Chemotherapy Prophylactic Antiemetic Therapy for Gastrointestinal Cancer under Dexamethasone Supply Difficulties during COVID-19].","authors":"Satoko Arai, Saki Oida, Akio Murakami, Keiichi Koido, Nobuhisa Teranishi, Takahiro Gunji","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to supply difficulties and other factors associated with COVID-19, oral dexamethasone became less readily available. To address this limitation, we investigated the effect of adjusting prophylactic antiemetic therapy on the efficacy of anticancer drug treatment. This study included patients in the gastrointestinal oncology unit of our hospital who received a regimen containing moderately emetogenic risk anticancer drugs between September 2021 and August 2022. We retrospectively analyzed medical records to assess the treatment regimen, prophylactic antiemetic therapy, oral dexamethasone dose reduction, presence of emetic events during the first course, use of additional antiemetic agents for prominent nausea and vomiting, and the complete response(CR)rate. The study included 98 patients with a median age of 71 years. The overall CR rate was 95% in the standard-dose dexamethasone group and 92.3% in the dexamethasone-reduced group(p=0.68). The CR rates for oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based regimens were 92.9% and 100% in the dexamethasone-reduced group and 91.5% and 94.7% in the standard-dose dexamethasone group. In this study, the CR rates were not significantly different between the dexamethasone reduction and standard-dose groups. This may be due to the use of steroid-sparing or triple therapy by physicians, depending on the patient's risk factors. Therefore, the prophylactic antiemetic therapies for individual patients must be continued to examine.</p>","PeriodicalId":35588,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy","volume":"51 10","pages":"1029-1032"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to supply difficulties and other factors associated with COVID-19, oral dexamethasone became less readily available. To address this limitation, we investigated the effect of adjusting prophylactic antiemetic therapy on the efficacy of anticancer drug treatment. This study included patients in the gastrointestinal oncology unit of our hospital who received a regimen containing moderately emetogenic risk anticancer drugs between September 2021 and August 2022. We retrospectively analyzed medical records to assess the treatment regimen, prophylactic antiemetic therapy, oral dexamethasone dose reduction, presence of emetic events during the first course, use of additional antiemetic agents for prominent nausea and vomiting, and the complete response(CR)rate. The study included 98 patients with a median age of 71 years. The overall CR rate was 95% in the standard-dose dexamethasone group and 92.3% in the dexamethasone-reduced group(p=0.68). The CR rates for oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based regimens were 92.9% and 100% in the dexamethasone-reduced group and 91.5% and 94.7% in the standard-dose dexamethasone group. In this study, the CR rates were not significantly different between the dexamethasone reduction and standard-dose groups. This may be due to the use of steroid-sparing or triple therapy by physicians, depending on the patient's risk factors. Therefore, the prophylactic antiemetic therapies for individual patients must be continued to examine.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[在 COVID-19 期间地塞米松供应困难的情况下减少地塞米松用量对胃肠道癌症化疗预防性止吐疗法的影响]。
由于 COVID-19 的供应困难和其他相关因素,口服地塞米松变得不那么容易获得。针对这一局限性,我们研究了调整预防性止吐治疗对抗癌药物疗效的影响。本研究纳入了我院胃肠肿瘤科在 2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 8 月期间接受含有中度致吐风险抗癌药物治疗方案的患者。我们对病历进行了回顾性分析,以评估治疗方案、预防性止吐治疗、口服地塞米松剂量的减少、首个疗程中出现的催吐事件、因恶心和呕吐突出而额外使用的止吐药以及完全应答率(CR)。该研究共纳入98名患者,中位年龄为71岁。标准剂量地塞米松组的总CR率为95%,地塞米松减量组为92.3%(P=0.68)。以奥沙利铂和伊立替康为基础的方案,地塞米松减量组的CR率分别为92.9%和100%,标准剂量地塞米松组的CR率分别为91.5%和94.7%。在这项研究中,地塞米松减量组和标准剂量组的 CR 率没有明显差异。这可能是由于医生根据患者的风险因素使用了类固醇保留疗法或三联疗法。因此,必须继续研究个别患者的预防性止吐疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
337
期刊最新文献
[Online Survey about Communication between Abemaciclib-Treated Patients with Breast Cancer and Physicians]. [Survey on the Size of Oral Anticancer Drugs]. [Ⅰ. Personalized Perioperative Therapy in Luminal Breast Cancer]. [Ⅱ. Recurrence Score in Patients with BRCA1/2 Mutation from the OlympiA and TAILORx Trial Results]. [Ⅲ. MONARCH-E and Oncotype DX].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1