Application of a Social Vulnerability Index and Its Associations with Physical Frailty and Disability in a Cross-sectional Study of Older Kenyan Women Living with and without HIV.

IF 3.3 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of Frailty & Aging Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.14283/jfa.2024.71
S Prabhu, B Oyaro, G Wanje, F M Aunon, N Gomez Juarez, B P Flaherty, W McCormick, M K Andrew, W Jaoko, R S McClelland, S M Graham
{"title":"Application of a Social Vulnerability Index and Its Associations with Physical Frailty and Disability in a Cross-sectional Study of Older Kenyan Women Living with and without HIV.","authors":"S Prabhu, B Oyaro, G Wanje, F M Aunon, N Gomez Juarez, B P Flaherty, W McCormick, M K Andrew, W Jaoko, R S McClelland, S M Graham","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social vulnerability reflects deficits in social resources that may disproportionally impact older women with HIV (WWH) in Africa.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the relationship between scores on an adapted Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and measures of physical frailty and disability.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>293 women (156 HIV-positive, 137 HIV-negative) aged >40 years in Mombasa, Kenya who were recruited from the Mombasa Cohort of women with a history of transactional sex and the general community.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Assessments including an SVI adapted for the Kenyan context (SVI-Kenya), the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment (WHODAS) were compared by HIV status. Linear regression was used to determine the relationship between SVI-Kenya score and both CFS and WHODAS, after adjustment for potential confounders. An exploratory analysis identified factors associated with SVI-Kenya score. An age-by-HIV-status interaction term was tested and retained if significant in unadjusted analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean SVI-Kenya score was 34.1 (SD, 12.9) and did not differ by HIV status (p=0.49). In adjusted analyses, each increment in SVI-Kenya score was associated with a 1.10-point higher WHODAS score (95%CI:0. 21, 1.99), but not with CFS. In exploratory analysis, factors associated with higher SVI-Kenya score included WHODAS score (adjusted beta=0.20; 95%CI: 0.05,0.35) and Mombasa Cohort recruitment (adjusted beta=5.91; 95%CI: 2.07,9.75). Being married, separated/divorced, or widowed predicted lower SVI-Kenya scores (by 5.52-9.09 points) compared to being single. Age did not predict SVI-Kenya score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social vulnerability as measured by the SVI-Kenya score was associated with greater disability but not physical frailty. Social vulnerability was also associated with prior sex work and never having married. Our findings suggest that social vulnerability is a distinct construct from physical frailty among older Kenyan women and not related to HIV status.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":"13 4","pages":"552-560"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social vulnerability reflects deficits in social resources that may disproportionally impact older women with HIV (WWH) in Africa.

Objective: To examine the relationship between scores on an adapted Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and measures of physical frailty and disability.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Participants: 293 women (156 HIV-positive, 137 HIV-negative) aged >40 years in Mombasa, Kenya who were recruited from the Mombasa Cohort of women with a history of transactional sex and the general community.

Measurements: Assessments including an SVI adapted for the Kenyan context (SVI-Kenya), the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment (WHODAS) were compared by HIV status. Linear regression was used to determine the relationship between SVI-Kenya score and both CFS and WHODAS, after adjustment for potential confounders. An exploratory analysis identified factors associated with SVI-Kenya score. An age-by-HIV-status interaction term was tested and retained if significant in unadjusted analyses.

Results: Mean SVI-Kenya score was 34.1 (SD, 12.9) and did not differ by HIV status (p=0.49). In adjusted analyses, each increment in SVI-Kenya score was associated with a 1.10-point higher WHODAS score (95%CI:0. 21, 1.99), but not with CFS. In exploratory analysis, factors associated with higher SVI-Kenya score included WHODAS score (adjusted beta=0.20; 95%CI: 0.05,0.35) and Mombasa Cohort recruitment (adjusted beta=5.91; 95%CI: 2.07,9.75). Being married, separated/divorced, or widowed predicted lower SVI-Kenya scores (by 5.52-9.09 points) compared to being single. Age did not predict SVI-Kenya score.

Conclusion: Social vulnerability as measured by the SVI-Kenya score was associated with greater disability but not physical frailty. Social vulnerability was also associated with prior sex work and never having married. Our findings suggest that social vulnerability is a distinct construct from physical frailty among older Kenyan women and not related to HIV status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在肯尼亚感染和未感染艾滋病毒的老年妇女横断面研究中应用社会脆弱性指数及其与身体虚弱和残疾的关联。
背景:社会脆弱性反映了社会资源的不足,这可能会对非洲感染艾滋病毒的老年妇女(WWH)造成不成比例的影响:研究改编后的社会脆弱性指数(SVI)得分与身体虚弱和残疾程度之间的关系:参与者:肯尼亚蒙巴萨 293 名年龄大于 40 岁的女性(156 名 HIV 阳性,137 名 HIV 阴性),她们是从蒙巴萨队列中有性交易史的女性和普通社区中招募的:根据艾滋病毒感染状况对包括根据肯尼亚国情改编的 SVI(SVI-Kenya)、临床虚弱量表(CFS)和世界卫生组织残疾评估(WHODAS)在内的评估进行比较。在对潜在的混杂因素进行调整后,采用线性回归法确定 SVI-Kenya 评分与 CFS 和 WHODAS 之间的关系。探索性分析确定了与 SVI-Kenya 评分相关的因素。测试了年龄与艾滋病毒感染状况的交互项,如果在未调整分析中显著,则保留该交互项:平均 SVI-Kenya 得分为 34.1(标准差,12.9),与 HIV 感染状况无差异(p=0.49)。在调整分析中,SVI-Kenya 分数每增加一分,WHODAS 分数就会增加 1.10 分(95%CI:0.21, 1.99),但与 CFS 无关。在探索性分析中,与 SVI-Kenya 评分较高相关的因素包括 WHODAS 评分(调整后的贝塔值=0.20;95%CI:0.05,0.35)和蒙巴萨队列招募(调整后的贝塔值=5.91;95%CI:2.07,9.75)。与单身相比,已婚、分居/离婚或丧偶者的 SVI-Kenya 分数较低(5.52-9.09 分)。年龄不能预测 SVI-Kenya 分数:结论:以 SVI-Kenya 评分衡量的社会脆弱性与残疾程度的增加有关,但与身体虚弱程度无关。社会脆弱性还与曾经从事性工作和从未结婚有关。我们的研究结果表明,在肯尼亚老年妇女中,社会脆弱性是一个不同于身体虚弱的概念,与艾滋病毒感染状况无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Frailty & Aging
Journal of Frailty & Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a peer-reviewed international journal aimed at presenting articles that are related to research in the area of aging and age-related (sub)clinical conditions. In particular, the journal publishes high-quality papers describing and discussing social, biological, and clinical features underlying the onset and development of frailty in older persons.          The Journal of Frailty & Aging is composed by five different sections: - Biology of frailty and aging In this section, the journal presents reports from preclinical studies and experiences focused at identifying, describing, and understanding the subclinical pathophysiological mechanisms at the basis of frailty and aging. - Physical frailty and age-related body composition modifications Studies exploring the physical and functional components of frailty are contained in this section. Moreover, since body composition plays a major role in determining physical frailty and, at the same time, represents the most evident feature of the aging process, special attention is given to studies focused on sarcopenia and obesity at older age. - Neurosciences of frailty and aging The section presents results from studies exploring the cognitive and neurological aspects of frailty and age-related conditions. In particular, papers on neurodegenerative conditions of advanced age are welcomed. - Frailty and aging in clinical practice and public health This journal’s section is devoted at presenting studies on clinical issues of frailty and age-related conditions. This multidisciplinary section particularly welcomes reports from clinicians coming from different backgrounds and specialties dealing with the heterogeneous clinical manifestations of advanced age. Moreover, this part of the journal also contains reports on frailty- and age-related social and public health issues. - Clinical trials and therapeutics This final section contains all the manuscripts presenting data on (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) interventions aimed at preventing, delaying, or treating frailty and age-related conditions.The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a quarterly publication of original papers, review articles, case reports, controversies, letters to the Editor, and book reviews. Manuscripts will be evaluated by the editorial staff and, if suitable, by expert reviewers assigned by the editors. The journal particularly welcomes papers by researchers from different backgrounds and specialities who may want to share their views and experiences on the common themes of frailty and aging.The abstracting and indexing of the Journal of Frailty & Aging is covered by MEDLINE (approval by the National Library of Medicine in February 2016).
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of teledentistry versus clinical oral examination for aged-care home residents: A pilot study. Age Self Care-Resilience, a medical group visit program targeting pre-frailty: A mixed methods pilot clinical trial. Association between oral health-related quality of life and physical frailty among community-dwelling older adults: A 2-year longitudinal study. Body composition of older adults with normal body mass index. Cross-sectional analysis of the Toulouse Frailty clinic. Heart rate variability as a digital biomarker for frailty in cardiovascular patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1