Why do even strong intenders sometimes fail to act? Evidence from protection, detection, and risk health behaviors.

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY Health Psychology Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1037/hea0001446
Mark Conner, Paul Norman
{"title":"Why do even strong intenders sometimes fail to act? Evidence from protection, detection, and risk health behaviors.","authors":"Mark Conner, Paul Norman","doi":"10.1037/hea0001446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Behavioral intentions are one of the strongest predictors of health behavior. The current research explored the factors predicting action in those with already strong intentions (i.e., those with the most extreme intention scores).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Across four studies on different types of health behavior (physical activity, bowel screening, smoking initiation, COVID-19 protection behaviors), attitudes, norms, perceived behavioral control and past behavior (plus habit in Study 4) were tested as prospective predictors of action in the subsample of participants with extreme (strong) intentions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Studies 1 (<i>N</i> = 392) and 2 (<i>N</i> = 808) among strong intenders, norms and past behavior were consistent predictors of engaging in objectively assessed physical activity and bowel screening, respectively. In Studies 3 (<i>N</i> = 4,148) and 4 (<i>N</i> = 445) among strong intenders, affective attitudes (only Study 3), descriptive norms, capacity/autonomy, and past behavior were predictors of resisting smoking initiation and engaging in COVID-19 protection behaviors, respectively. Study 4 also showed habit to be a significant predictor of action in strong intenders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research identifies factors that might be useful targets to promote engagement with health behaviors in those with already strong intentions to act. Future research could usefully test whether targeting these same variables translates into behavior change in those with already strong intentions to act. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55066,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001446","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Behavioral intentions are one of the strongest predictors of health behavior. The current research explored the factors predicting action in those with already strong intentions (i.e., those with the most extreme intention scores).

Method: Across four studies on different types of health behavior (physical activity, bowel screening, smoking initiation, COVID-19 protection behaviors), attitudes, norms, perceived behavioral control and past behavior (plus habit in Study 4) were tested as prospective predictors of action in the subsample of participants with extreme (strong) intentions.

Results: In Studies 1 (N = 392) and 2 (N = 808) among strong intenders, norms and past behavior were consistent predictors of engaging in objectively assessed physical activity and bowel screening, respectively. In Studies 3 (N = 4,148) and 4 (N = 445) among strong intenders, affective attitudes (only Study 3), descriptive norms, capacity/autonomy, and past behavior were predictors of resisting smoking initiation and engaging in COVID-19 protection behaviors, respectively. Study 4 also showed habit to be a significant predictor of action in strong intenders.

Conclusion: This research identifies factors that might be useful targets to promote engagement with health behaviors in those with already strong intentions to act. Future research could usefully test whether targeting these same variables translates into behavior change in those with already strong intentions to act. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么强烈的意向者有时也会失败?来自保护、检测和风险健康行为的证据。
目的:行为意向是健康行为最有力的预测因素之一。目前的研究探讨了预测那些已经有强烈行为意向的人(即意向得分最高的人)采取行动的因素:方法:在四项关于不同类型健康行为(体育锻炼、肠道筛查、开始吸烟、COVID-19 保护行为)的研究中,对态度、规范、感知行为控制和过去行为(以及研究 4 中的习惯)进行了测试,作为具有极端(强烈)意向的参与者子样本中行动的前瞻性预测因素:结果:在研究 1(样本数=392)和研究 2(样本数=808)中,在强烈意向者中,规范和以往行为分别是参与客观评估的体育活动和肠道筛查的一致预测因素。在针对强烈意愿者的研究3(N = 4,148)和研究4(N = 445)中,情感态度(仅研究3)、描述性规范、能力/自主性和既往行为分别是抵制开始吸烟和参与COVID-19保护行为的预测因素。研究 4 还显示,习惯是强烈意愿者行动的重要预测因素:这项研究确定了一些因素,这些因素可能是促进那些已有强烈行动意愿的人参与健康行为的有用目标。未来的研究可以检验,针对这些相同的变量是否会使那些已经有强烈行动意愿的人的行为发生改变。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Psychology
Health Psychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology publishes articles on psychological, biobehavioral, social, and environmental factors in physical health and medical illness, and other issues in health psychology.
期刊最新文献
Why do even strong intenders sometimes fail to act? Evidence from protection, detection, and risk health behaviors. Anxiety, depression, and fear of cancer recurrence in head and neck cancer. Black men's health-related quality of life: A qualitative study to understand community-identified perception and needs. Interventions involving nudge theory for COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Training physicians in motivational communication: An integrated knowledge transfer study protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1