Four New Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Examining Health-Seeking Behavior in Persons With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (REDD-CAT): Instrument Development Study.

Q2 Medicine JMIR Diabetes Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.2196/63434
Suzanne E Mitchell, Michael A Kallen, Jonathan P Troost, Barbara A De La Cruz, Alexa Bragg, Jessica Martin-Howard, Ioana Moldovan, Jennifer A Miner, Brian W Jack, Noelle E Carlozzi
{"title":"Four New Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Examining Health-Seeking Behavior in Persons With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (REDD-CAT): Instrument Development Study.","authors":"Suzanne E Mitchell, Michael A Kallen, Jonathan P Troost, Barbara A De La Cruz, Alexa Bragg, Jessica Martin-Howard, Ioana Moldovan, Jennifer A Miner, Brian W Jack, Noelle E Carlozzi","doi":"10.2196/63434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) includes mastery of complex care activities, self-management skills, and routine health care encounters to optimize glucose control and achieve good health. Given the lifelong course of T2DM, patients are faced with navigating complex medical and disease-specific information. This health-seeking behavior is a driver of health disparities and is associated with hospitalization and readmission. Given that health-seeking behavior is a potentially intervenable social determinant of health, a better understanding of how people navigate these complex systems is warranted.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To address this need, we aimed to develop new patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures that evaluate health-seeking behavior in persons with T2DM. These new PROs were designed to be included in the Re-Engineered Discharge for Diabetes-Computer Adaptive Test (REDD-CAT) measurement system, which includes several other PROs that capture the importance of social determinants of health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, 225 participants with T2DM completed 56 self-report items that examined health-seeking behaviors. Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory were used for measurement development. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA; criterion ratio of eigenvalue 1 to eigenvalue 2 being >4; variance for eigenvalue 1 ≥40%) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; criterion 1-factor CFA loading <.50; 1-factor CFA residual correlation >.20; comparative fit index ≥0.90; Tucker-Lewis index ≥0.90; root mean square error of approximation <0.15) were used to determine unidimensional sets of items. Items with sparse responses, low-adjusted total score correlations, nonmonotonicity, low factor loading, and high residual correlations of high error modification indices were candidates for exclusion. A constrained graded response model was used to examine item misfit, and differential item functioning was examined to identify item bias. Cronbach α was used to examine internal consistency reliability for the new PROs (criterion ≥0.70), and floor and ceiling effects were examined (criterion ≤20%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four unidimensional sets of items were supported by EFA (all EFA eigenvalue ratios >4; variance for eigenvalue 1=41.4%-67.3%) and CFA (fit statistics all exceeded criterion values). This included (1) \"Health-Seeking Behavior: PCP-Specific\" (6 items); (2) \"Health-Seeking Behavior: General Beliefs\" (13 items); (3) \"Health-Seeking Behavior: Family or Friends-Specific\" (5 items); and (4) \"Health-Seeking Behavior: Internet-Specific\" (4 items). All items were devoid of differential item functioning for age, sex, education, or socioeconomic status factors. \"Health-Seeking Behavior: General Beliefs\" was developed to include both a computer adaptive test and a 6-item short form version; all other PROs were developed as static short forms. The psychometric reliability of these new PROs was supported; internal consistency ranged from acceptable to excellent (Cronbach α=.78-.91), and measures were free of significant floor or ceiling effects (floor effects range: 0%-8.9%; ceiling effects range: 0%-8.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new REDD-CAT Health-Seeking Behavior PROs provide reliable assessments of health-seeking behaviors among those with T2DM.</p>","PeriodicalId":52371,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Diabetes","volume":"9 ","pages":"e63434"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11624447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/63434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) includes mastery of complex care activities, self-management skills, and routine health care encounters to optimize glucose control and achieve good health. Given the lifelong course of T2DM, patients are faced with navigating complex medical and disease-specific information. This health-seeking behavior is a driver of health disparities and is associated with hospitalization and readmission. Given that health-seeking behavior is a potentially intervenable social determinant of health, a better understanding of how people navigate these complex systems is warranted.

Objective: To address this need, we aimed to develop new patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures that evaluate health-seeking behavior in persons with T2DM. These new PROs were designed to be included in the Re-Engineered Discharge for Diabetes-Computer Adaptive Test (REDD-CAT) measurement system, which includes several other PROs that capture the importance of social determinants of health.

Methods: Overall, 225 participants with T2DM completed 56 self-report items that examined health-seeking behaviors. Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory were used for measurement development. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA; criterion ratio of eigenvalue 1 to eigenvalue 2 being >4; variance for eigenvalue 1 ≥40%) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; criterion 1-factor CFA loading <.50; 1-factor CFA residual correlation >.20; comparative fit index ≥0.90; Tucker-Lewis index ≥0.90; root mean square error of approximation <0.15) were used to determine unidimensional sets of items. Items with sparse responses, low-adjusted total score correlations, nonmonotonicity, low factor loading, and high residual correlations of high error modification indices were candidates for exclusion. A constrained graded response model was used to examine item misfit, and differential item functioning was examined to identify item bias. Cronbach α was used to examine internal consistency reliability for the new PROs (criterion ≥0.70), and floor and ceiling effects were examined (criterion ≤20%).

Results: Four unidimensional sets of items were supported by EFA (all EFA eigenvalue ratios >4; variance for eigenvalue 1=41.4%-67.3%) and CFA (fit statistics all exceeded criterion values). This included (1) "Health-Seeking Behavior: PCP-Specific" (6 items); (2) "Health-Seeking Behavior: General Beliefs" (13 items); (3) "Health-Seeking Behavior: Family or Friends-Specific" (5 items); and (4) "Health-Seeking Behavior: Internet-Specific" (4 items). All items were devoid of differential item functioning for age, sex, education, or socioeconomic status factors. "Health-Seeking Behavior: General Beliefs" was developed to include both a computer adaptive test and a 6-item short form version; all other PROs were developed as static short forms. The psychometric reliability of these new PROs was supported; internal consistency ranged from acceptable to excellent (Cronbach α=.78-.91), and measures were free of significant floor or ceiling effects (floor effects range: 0%-8.9%; ceiling effects range: 0%-8.4%).

Conclusions: The new REDD-CAT Health-Seeking Behavior PROs provide reliable assessments of health-seeking behaviors among those with T2DM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四种新的患者报告结果测量方法(REDD-CAT),用于检查 2 型糖尿病患者的健康寻求行为:工具开发研究。
背景:2 型糖尿病(T2DM)的管理包括掌握复杂的护理活动、自我管理技能和常规医疗护理,以优化血糖控制和实现健康。鉴于 T2DM 的终生病程,患者需要浏览复杂的医疗和疾病特定信息。这种寻求健康的行为是健康差异的驱动因素,并与住院和再入院有关。鉴于寻求健康的行为是健康的一个潜在可干预的社会决定因素,我们有必要更好地了解人们如何驾驭这些复杂的系统:为了满足这一需求,我们旨在开发新的患者报告结果(PRO)测量方法,以评估 T2DM 患者的求医行为。这些新的患者报告结果旨在纳入糖尿病出院再干预--计算机自适应测试(REDD-CAT)测量系统,该系统包括其他几项患者报告结果,能够反映健康的社会决定因素的重要性:总体而言,225 名 T2DM 患者完成了 56 个自我报告项目,这些项目考察了他们寻求健康的行为。测量开发采用了经典测试理论和项目反应理论。探索性因子分析(EFA;标准为特征值 1 与特征值 2 之比大于 4;特征值 1 的方差≥40%)和确认性因子分析(CFA;标准为 1 个因子的 CFA 负荷为 0.20;比较拟合指数≥0.90;Tucker-Lewis 指数≥0.90;均方根近似误差)的结果:EFA(所有 EFA 特征值比均大于 4;特征值 1 的方差=41.4%-67.3%)和 CFA(拟合统计量均超过标准值)支持四组单维项目。其中包括 (1) "寻求健康的行为:具体的初级保健医生"(6 个项目);(2) "寻求健康的行为:一般信念"(13 个项目);(3) "寻求健康的行为:家人或朋友特定"(5 个项目);以及 (4) "寻求健康的行为:互联网特定"(4 个项目):互联网特定"(4 个项目)。所有项目都没有因年龄、性别、教育或社会经济地位因素而产生的项目功能差异。"寻求健康的行为:一般信念 "包括一个计算机自适应测试和一个 6 个项目的简表版本;其他所有 PRO 均为静态简表。这些新的PROs的心理测量可靠性得到了支持;内部一致性从可接受到优秀不等(Cronbach α=.78-.91),测量结果没有明显的下限或上限效应(下限效应范围:0%-8.9%;上限效应范围:0%-8.4%):结论:新的REDD-CAT健康寻求行为PRO可对T2DM患者的健康寻求行为进行可靠的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Diabetes
JMIR Diabetes Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Use of Activity Trackers to Support Physical Activity and Reduce Sedentary Behavior in Adults Diagnosed With Type 2 Diabetes: Qualitative Interview Study Using the RE-AIM Framework. Exploring Opportunities and Challenges for the Spread, Scale-Up, and Sustainability of mHealth Apps for Self-Management of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Netherlands: Citizen Science Approach. Personalized and Culturally Tailored Features of Mobile Apps for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Their Impact on Patient Self-Management: Scoping Review. Association of Blood Glucose Data With Physiological and Nutritional Data From Dietary Surveys and Wearable Devices: Database Analysis. Health and eHealth Literacy of Patients With Diabetes in Low-Income Countries: Perspective From Guinea and Burkina Faso.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1