Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict the risk of readmission within one year in HFpEF patients

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS International Journal of Medical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105703
Yue Hu , Fanghui Ma , Mengjie Hu , Binbing Shi , Defeng Pan , Jingjing Ren
{"title":"Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict the risk of readmission within one year in HFpEF patients","authors":"Yue Hu ,&nbsp;Fanghui Ma ,&nbsp;Mengjie Hu ,&nbsp;Binbing Shi ,&nbsp;Defeng Pan ,&nbsp;Jingjing Ren","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with elevated rates of readmission and mortality. Accurate prediction of readmission risk is essential for optimizing healthcare resources and enhancing patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing HFpEF patient data from two institutions: the First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine for model development and internal validation, and the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University for external validation. A machine learning (ML) model was developed and validated using 53 variables to predict the risk of readmission within one year. The model’s performance was assessed using several metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, model training time, model prediction time and brier score. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis was employed to enhance model interpretability, and a dynamic nomogram was constructed to visualize the predictive model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 766 HFpEF patients included in the study, 203 (26.5%) were readmitted within one year. The LightGBM model exhibited the highest predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI):0.84–0.91), an accuracy of 0.79, a sensitivity of 0.81, and a specificity of 0.78. Key predictors included the E/e’ ratio, NYHA classification, LVEF, age, BNP levels, MLR, history of atrial fibrillation (AF), use of ACEI/ARB/ARNI, and history of myocardial infarction (MI). External validation also demonstrated strong predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.87 (95%CI:0.83–0.91).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The LightGBM model exhibited robust performance in predicting one-year readmission risk among HFpEF patients, providing a valuable tool for clinicians to identify high-risk individuals and implement timely interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 105703"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505624003666","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with elevated rates of readmission and mortality. Accurate prediction of readmission risk is essential for optimizing healthcare resources and enhancing patient outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing HFpEF patient data from two institutions: the First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine for model development and internal validation, and the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University for external validation. A machine learning (ML) model was developed and validated using 53 variables to predict the risk of readmission within one year. The model’s performance was assessed using several metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, model training time, model prediction time and brier score. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis was employed to enhance model interpretability, and a dynamic nomogram was constructed to visualize the predictive model.

Results

Among the 766 HFpEF patients included in the study, 203 (26.5%) were readmitted within one year. The LightGBM model exhibited the highest predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI):0.84–0.91), an accuracy of 0.79, a sensitivity of 0.81, and a specificity of 0.78. Key predictors included the E/e’ ratio, NYHA classification, LVEF, age, BNP levels, MLR, history of atrial fibrillation (AF), use of ACEI/ARB/ARNI, and history of myocardial infarction (MI). External validation also demonstrated strong predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.87 (95%CI:0.83–0.91).

Conclusions

The LightGBM model exhibited robust performance in predicting one-year readmission risk among HFpEF patients, providing a valuable tool for clinicians to identify high-risk individuals and implement timely interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习模型的开发与验证:预测高房颤患者一年内再次入院的风险短标题:高血压脑梗塞再入院预测。
背景:射血分数保留型心力衰竭(HFpEF)与再入院率和死亡率升高有关。准确预测再入院风险对于优化医疗资源和改善患者预后至关重要:我们利用浙江大学医学院附属第一医院和徐州医科大学附属医院两家机构的 HFpEF 患者数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究,前者用于模型开发和内部验证,后者用于外部验证。利用 53 个变量开发并验证了一个机器学习(ML)模型,用于预测一年内再入院的风险。该模型的性能通过多个指标进行评估,包括接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、准确性、灵敏度、特异性、F1得分、模型训练时间、模型预测时间和布赖尔得分。为了提高模型的可解释性,采用了SHAP(SHapley Additive exPlanations)分析法,并构建了动态提名图来直观显示预测模型:结果:在纳入研究的 766 名高频血友病患者中,有 203 人(26.5%)在一年内再次入院。LightGBM 模型的预测性能最高,AUC 为 0.88(95% 置信区间 (CI):0.84-0.91),准确率为 0.79,灵敏度为 0.81,特异性为 0.78。主要预测因素包括E/e'比值、NYHA分级、LVEF、年龄、BNP水平、MLR、心房颤动(AF)病史、ACEI/ARB/ARNI的使用以及心肌梗死(MI)病史。外部验证也显示出很强的预测性能,AUC 为 0.87(95%CI:0.83-0.91):LightGBM模型在预测HFpEF患者一年内再入院风险方面表现强劲,为临床医生识别高危人群并及时实施干预提供了有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of missing data in electronic health records of people with diabetes in primary care in Spain: A population-based cohort study Systematic construction of composite radiation therapy dataset using automated data pipeline for prognosis prediction Perceptions of healthcare professionals and patients with cardiovascular diseases on mHealth lifestyle apps: A qualitative study Smart data-driven medical decisions through collective and individual anomaly detection in healthcare time series An interpretable machine learning scoring tool for estimating time to recurrence readmissions in stroke patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1