The gut microbiota of three avian species living in sympatry.

IF 2.3 Q2 ECOLOGY BMC ecology and evolution Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1186/s12862-024-02329-9
Hugo Pereira, Nayden Chakarov, Barbara A Caspers, Marc Gilles, William Jones, Tafitasoa Mijoro, Sama Zefania, Tamás Székely, Oliver Krüger, Joseph I Hoffman
{"title":"The gut microbiota of three avian species living in sympatry.","authors":"Hugo Pereira, Nayden Chakarov, Barbara A Caspers, Marc Gilles, William Jones, Tafitasoa Mijoro, Sama Zefania, Tamás Székely, Oliver Krüger, Joseph I Hoffman","doi":"10.1186/s12862-024-02329-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evolutionary divergence and genetic variation are often linked to differences in microbial community structure and diversity. While environmental factors and diet heavily influence gut microbial communities, host species contributions are harder to quantify. Closely related species living in sympatry provide a unique opportunity to investigate species differences without the confounding effects of habitat and dietary variation. We therefore compared and contrasted the gut microbiota of three sympatric plover species: the widespread Kittlitz's and white-fronted plovers (Anarhynchus pecuarius and A. marginatus) and the endemic and vulnerable Madagascar plover (A. thoracicus).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no significant differences in the beta diversity (composition) of the gut microbiota of the three species. However, A. thoracicus exhibited higher intraspecific compositional similarity (i.e. lower pairwise distances) than the other two species; this pattern was especially pronounced among juveniles. By contrast, microbial alpha diversity varied significantly among the species, being highest in A. pecuarius, intermediate in A. marginatus and lowest in A. thoracicus. This pattern was again stronger among juveniles. Geographical distance did not significantly affect the composition of the gut microbiota, but genetic relatedness did.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While patterns of microbial diversity varied across species, the lack of compositional differences suggests that habitat and diet likely exert a strong influence on the gut microbiota of plovers. This may be enhanced by their precocial, ground-dwelling nature, which could facilitate the horizontal transmission of microbes from the environment. We hypothesise that gut microbiota diversity in plovers primarily reflects the ecological pool of microbiota, which is subsequently modified by host-specific factors including genetics. The reduced microbial and genetic diversity of the endemic A. thoracicus may hinder its ability to adapt to environmental changes, highlighting the need for increased conservation efforts for this vulnerable species.</p>","PeriodicalId":93910,"journal":{"name":"BMC ecology and evolution","volume":"24 1","pages":"144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580620/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC ecology and evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-024-02329-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evolutionary divergence and genetic variation are often linked to differences in microbial community structure and diversity. While environmental factors and diet heavily influence gut microbial communities, host species contributions are harder to quantify. Closely related species living in sympatry provide a unique opportunity to investigate species differences without the confounding effects of habitat and dietary variation. We therefore compared and contrasted the gut microbiota of three sympatric plover species: the widespread Kittlitz's and white-fronted plovers (Anarhynchus pecuarius and A. marginatus) and the endemic and vulnerable Madagascar plover (A. thoracicus).

Results: We found no significant differences in the beta diversity (composition) of the gut microbiota of the three species. However, A. thoracicus exhibited higher intraspecific compositional similarity (i.e. lower pairwise distances) than the other two species; this pattern was especially pronounced among juveniles. By contrast, microbial alpha diversity varied significantly among the species, being highest in A. pecuarius, intermediate in A. marginatus and lowest in A. thoracicus. This pattern was again stronger among juveniles. Geographical distance did not significantly affect the composition of the gut microbiota, but genetic relatedness did.

Conclusion: While patterns of microbial diversity varied across species, the lack of compositional differences suggests that habitat and diet likely exert a strong influence on the gut microbiota of plovers. This may be enhanced by their precocial, ground-dwelling nature, which could facilitate the horizontal transmission of microbes from the environment. We hypothesise that gut microbiota diversity in plovers primarily reflects the ecological pool of microbiota, which is subsequently modified by host-specific factors including genetics. The reduced microbial and genetic diversity of the endemic A. thoracicus may hinder its ability to adapt to environmental changes, highlighting the need for increased conservation efforts for this vulnerable species.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种共栖鸟类的肠道微生物群。
背景:进化分化和遗传变异往往与微生物群落结构和多样性的差异有关。虽然环境因素和饮食对肠道微生物群落有很大影响,但宿主物种的贡献却很难量化。生活在同域中的近缘物种为研究物种差异提供了一个独特的机会,而不会受到栖息地和饮食差异的干扰。因此,我们比较并对比了三个同域鸻物种的肠道微生物群:分布广泛的基特利兹鸻和白额鸻(Anarhynchus pecuarius和A. marginatus),以及特有且脆弱的马达加斯加鸻(A. thoracicus):结果:我们发现这三个物种的肠道微生物群的贝塔多样性(组成)没有明显差异。然而,胸鸻的种内组成相似性(即成对距离较低)高于其他两个物种;这种模式在幼鸟中尤为明显。相比之下,不同物种的微生物阿尔法多样性差异显著,啄木鸟的阿尔法多样性最高,边蛙的阿尔法多样性居中,胸棘鲷的阿尔法多样性最低。这种模式在幼鱼中更加明显。地理距离对肠道微生物群的组成没有明显影响,但遗传亲缘关系却有影响:结论:虽然不同物种的微生物多样性模式各不相同,但缺乏组成差异表明,栖息地和饮食可能对鸻的肠道微生物群有很大影响。鸻的前社会性和地栖性可能会促进微生物从环境中的水平传播。我们假设,鸻的肠道微生物群多样性主要反映了微生物群的生态库,随后又受到包括遗传在内的宿主特异性因素的影响。特有的胸径翠鸟微生物和遗传多样性的减少可能会阻碍其适应环境变化的能力,这凸显了加大对这一脆弱物种保护力度的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The gut microbiota of three avian species living in sympatry. Greater risk-taking by non-native than native shrimp: an advantage in a human-disturbed environment? Survival cost sharing among altruistic full siblings in Mendelian population. Next-generation phylogeography reveals unanticipated population history and climate and human impacts on the endangered floodplain bitterling (Acheilognathus longipinnis). Repeated evolution on oceanic islands: comparative genomics reveals species-specific processes in birds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1