Effects of Integrating Palliative Care in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Quality of Life and Psychological Outcomes.

Husam Bader, Husam Farraj, Saif Yamin, Hamzeh Feras Alshahwan, Joud Maghnam, Rafina Khateeb
{"title":"Effects of Integrating Palliative Care in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Quality of Life and Psychological Outcomes.","authors":"Husam Bader, Husam Farraj, Saif Yamin, Hamzeh Feras Alshahwan, Joud Maghnam, Rafina Khateeb","doi":"10.1177/10499091241297924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Patients with advanced cancer frequently have a wide range of mental and physical symptoms, making it difficult for them to communicate and make informed decisions. Necessitating the incorporation of palliative care in this population to meet their supportive care requirements. <b>Objective:</b> To investigate the effects of integrating Palliative care in advanced cancer patients. <b>Methods:</b> PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar databases were comprehensively and systematically searched for Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published up to February 2024. According to the PICOS criteria, trials enrolling adult patients with advanced cancer subjected to PC were included. Moreover, a risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and statistical analyses were performed using the Review Manager software. <b>Results:</b> Only 13 RCTs with 3,294 advanced cancer patients were included in the final analysis. A pooled analysis of data from these trials revealed that patients subjected to PC had improved quality of life (QoL) scores than those receiving standard care (SMD: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.07 - 0.30; p = 0.002). However, no significant difference was observed in depression (SMD: -0.03; 95% CI: -0.16 - 0.10; p = 0.63), anxiety (SMD: - 0.04; 95% CI: -0.23 - 0.15; p = 0.69), and survival (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.56 - 1.16; p = 0.25). <b>Conclusion:</b> Integrating PC in patients with advanced cancer results in improved QoL with limited effect on psychological distress symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"10499091241297924"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241297924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with advanced cancer frequently have a wide range of mental and physical symptoms, making it difficult for them to communicate and make informed decisions. Necessitating the incorporation of palliative care in this population to meet their supportive care requirements. Objective: To investigate the effects of integrating Palliative care in advanced cancer patients. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar databases were comprehensively and systematically searched for Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published up to February 2024. According to the PICOS criteria, trials enrolling adult patients with advanced cancer subjected to PC were included. Moreover, a risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and statistical analyses were performed using the Review Manager software. Results: Only 13 RCTs with 3,294 advanced cancer patients were included in the final analysis. A pooled analysis of data from these trials revealed that patients subjected to PC had improved quality of life (QoL) scores than those receiving standard care (SMD: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.07 - 0.30; p = 0.002). However, no significant difference was observed in depression (SMD: -0.03; 95% CI: -0.16 - 0.10; p = 0.63), anxiety (SMD: - 0.04; 95% CI: -0.23 - 0.15; p = 0.69), and survival (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.56 - 1.16; p = 0.25). Conclusion: Integrating PC in patients with advanced cancer results in improved QoL with limited effect on psychological distress symptoms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整合姑息治疗对晚期癌症患者的影响:对生活质量和心理结果的系统回顾和荟萃分析》(A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Quality of Life and Psychological Outcomes)。
背景:晚期癌症患者经常会出现各种精神和身体症状,使他们难以沟通和做出明智的决定。因此,有必要为这类患者提供姑息治疗,以满足他们的支持性护理需求。目的研究姑息治疗在晚期癌症患者中的应用效果。研究方法在 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) 和 Google Scholar 数据库中全面系统地检索了截至 2024 年 2 月发表的随机临床试验 (RCT)。根据 PICOS 标准,纳入了对晚期癌症成年患者进行 PC 治疗的试验。此外,还使用 Cochrane Risk of Bias 工具进行了偏倚风险评估,并使用 Review Manager 软件进行了统计分析。结果最终分析中仅纳入了 13 项 RCT,涉及 3,294 名晚期癌症患者。对这些试验数据的汇总分析表明,与接受标准治疗的患者相比,接受 PC 治疗的患者的生活质量(QoL)评分有所提高(SMD:0.18;95% CI:0.07 - 0.30;P = 0.002)。然而,在抑郁(SMD:-0.03;95% CI:-0.16 - 0.10;p = 0.63)、焦虑(SMD:- 0.04;95% CI:-0.23 - 0.15;p = 0.69)和生存率(OR:0.81;95% CI:0.56 - 1.16;p = 0.25)方面未观察到明显差异。结论在晚期癌症患者中纳入 PC 可改善患者的生活质量,但对心理困扰症状的影响有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowledge and Attitude of the General Public Toward Palliative Care in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study. Differences in Attitudes and Barriers Towards Advance Care Planning Amongst Ischemic Heart Disease Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study. A Mixed Methods Analysis of Standardized Documentation of Serious Illness Conversations Within an Electronic Health Record Module During Hospitalization. Palliative and End-of-Life Care Interventions with Minoritized Populations in the US with Serious Illness: A Scoping Review. Exploring Palliative Care Needs Among Patients With Cancer and Non-Cancer Serious Chronic Diseases: A Comparison Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1