Safety and efficacy of remimazolam tosilate for general anaesthesia in paediatric patients undergoing elective surgery: a multicentre, randomised, single-blind, controlled trial

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1111/anae.16475
Yu-Bo Fang, John Wei Zhong, Peter Szmuk, Yun-Long Lyu, Ying Xu, Shuangquan Qu, Zhen Du, Wangning Shangguan, Hua-Cheng Liu
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of remimazolam tosilate for general anaesthesia in paediatric patients undergoing elective surgery: a multicentre, randomised, single-blind, controlled trial","authors":"Yu-Bo Fang,&nbsp;John Wei Zhong,&nbsp;Peter Szmuk,&nbsp;Yun-Long Lyu,&nbsp;Ying Xu,&nbsp;Shuangquan Qu,&nbsp;Zhen Du,&nbsp;Wangning Shangguan,&nbsp;Hua-Cheng Liu","doi":"10.1111/anae.16475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Remimazolam is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine sedative drug. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of remimazolam with propofol for induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia in children undergoing elective surgery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Children (aged 3–6 y, ASA physical status 1 or 2, BMI 14–25 kg.m<sup>-2</sup>) undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation were eligible for inclusion. Children were allocated randomly using a web-based system to receive either remimazolam or propofol in a 3:1 ratio. After receiving fentanyl 3 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup>, children received their allocated drug for both induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia. Induction doses were remimazolam 0.3 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> or propofol 2.5 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup>, with a second dose given should they not achieve loss of consciousness. After neuromuscular blockade and tracheal intubation, maintenance anaesthesia was achieved with an infusion either remimazolam 1–3 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup>.h<sup>-1</sup> or propofol 4–12 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup>.h<sup>-1</sup>, alongside a remifentanil infusion (0.1–0.5 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup>.min<sup>-1</sup>) titrated to surgical stimulus and haemodynamic parameters. Primary outcomes were the incidence of successful induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. Secondary outcomes included: time to loss of consciousness, awakening and tracheal extubation; incidence of emergence delirium and moderate or severe pain in post-anaesthesia care unit; incidence of negative behaviour change after surgery at postoperative day 3; and incidence of adverse events.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 187 children were analysed (140 allocated to remimazolam and 47 to propofol). All children achieved successful induction of anaesthesia. Successful maintenance of anaesthesia was achieved in 139 (99%) children who received remimazolam compared with 46 (98%) who received propofol (rate difference 1.4%, 95%CI -2.9–5.8%, p = 0.441). Adverse events occurred in 27 (19%) children who received remimazolam and 23 (49%) who received propofol.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Remimazolam was well tolerated for the induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia in pre-school-age children and was non-inferior to propofol.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"80 3","pages":"259-268"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.16475","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Remimazolam is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine sedative drug. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of remimazolam with propofol for induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia in children undergoing elective surgery.

Methods

Children (aged 3–6 y, ASA physical status 1 or 2, BMI 14–25 kg.m-2) undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation were eligible for inclusion. Children were allocated randomly using a web-based system to receive either remimazolam or propofol in a 3:1 ratio. After receiving fentanyl 3 μg.kg-1, children received their allocated drug for both induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia. Induction doses were remimazolam 0.3 mg.kg-1 or propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1, with a second dose given should they not achieve loss of consciousness. After neuromuscular blockade and tracheal intubation, maintenance anaesthesia was achieved with an infusion either remimazolam 1–3 mg.kg-1.h-1 or propofol 4–12 mg.kg-1.h-1, alongside a remifentanil infusion (0.1–0.5 μg.kg-1.min-1) titrated to surgical stimulus and haemodynamic parameters. Primary outcomes were the incidence of successful induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. Secondary outcomes included: time to loss of consciousness, awakening and tracheal extubation; incidence of emergence delirium and moderate or severe pain in post-anaesthesia care unit; incidence of negative behaviour change after surgery at postoperative day 3; and incidence of adverse events.

Results

A total of 187 children were analysed (140 allocated to remimazolam and 47 to propofol). All children achieved successful induction of anaesthesia. Successful maintenance of anaesthesia was achieved in 139 (99%) children who received remimazolam compared with 46 (98%) who received propofol (rate difference 1.4%, 95%CI -2.9–5.8%, p = 0.441). Adverse events occurred in 27 (19%) children who received remimazolam and 23 (49%) who received propofol.

Discussion

Remimazolam was well tolerated for the induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia in pre-school-age children and was non-inferior to propofol.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在接受择期手术的儿科患者中使用托西酸瑞马唑仑进行全身麻醉的安全性和有效性:一项多中心、随机、单盲、对照试验
雷马唑仑是一种超短效苯二氮卓镇静药物。本研究旨在比较雷马唑仑与异丙酚在儿童择期手术全身麻醉诱导和维持中的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information – Editorial Board Obesity may present challenges during gastric ultrasound. Puncturing the dura: a true clinical benefit or a distraction? A reply. Efficacy of different routes of dexamethasone administration for preventing rebound pain following peripheral nerve blocks in adult surgical patients: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis Outcomes of after-hours surgeries performed under general anaesthesia: a South Korean nationwide cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1