Tian-Rui Sun, Jin-Jun Geng, Jing-Zhi Yan, You-Dong Hu, Xue-Feng Wu, Alberto J. Castro-Tirado, Chao Yang, Yi-Ding Ping, Chen-Ran Hu, Fan Xu, Hao-Xuan Gao, Ji-An Jiang, Yan-Tian Zhu, Yongquan Xue, Ignacio Pérez-García, Si-Yu Wu, Emilio Fernández-García, María D. Caballero-García, Rubén Sánchez-Ramírez, Sergiy Guziy, I. Olivares, Carlos Jesus Pérez del Pulgar, A. Castellón, S. Castillo, Ding-Rong Xiong, Shashi B. Pandey, David Hiriart, Guillermo García-Segura, William H. Lee, I. M. Carrasco-García, Il H. Park, S. Jeong, Petrus J. Meintjes, Hendrik J. van Heerden, Antonio Martín-Carrillo, Lorraine Hanlon, Bin-Bin Zhang, L. Hernández-García, Maria Gritsevich, Andrea Rossi, Elisabetta Maiorano, Felice Cusano, Paolo D’Avanzo, Matteo Ferro, Andrea Melandri, Massimiliano De Pasquale, Riccardo Brivio, Min Fang, Lu-Lu Fan, Wei-Da Hu, Zhen Wan, Lei Hu, Ying-Xi Zuo, Jin-Long Tang, Xiao-Ling Zhang, Xian-Zhong Zheng, Bin Li, Wen-Tao Luo, Wei Liu, Jian Wang, Hong-Fei Zhang, Hao Liu, Jie Gao,..
{"title":"GRB 240529A: A Tale of Two Shocks","authors":"Tian-Rui Sun, Jin-Jun Geng, Jing-Zhi Yan, You-Dong Hu, Xue-Feng Wu, Alberto J. Castro-Tirado, Chao Yang, Yi-Ding Ping, Chen-Ran Hu, Fan Xu, Hao-Xuan Gao, Ji-An Jiang, Yan-Tian Zhu, Yongquan Xue, Ignacio Pérez-García, Si-Yu Wu, Emilio Fernández-García, María D. Caballero-García, Rubén Sánchez-Ramírez, Sergiy Guziy, I. Olivares, Carlos Jesus Pérez del Pulgar, A. Castellón, S. Castillo, Ding-Rong Xiong, Shashi B. Pandey, David Hiriart, Guillermo García-Segura, William H. Lee, I. M. Carrasco-García, Il H. Park, S. Jeong, Petrus J. Meintjes, Hendrik J. van Heerden, Antonio Martín-Carrillo, Lorraine Hanlon, Bin-Bin Zhang, L. Hernández-García, Maria Gritsevich, Andrea Rossi, Elisabetta Maiorano, Felice Cusano, Paolo D’Avanzo, Matteo Ferro, Andrea Melandri, Massimiliano De Pasquale, Riccardo Brivio, Min Fang, Lu-Lu Fan, Wei-Da Hu, Zhen Wan, Lei Hu, Ying-Xi Zuo, Jin-Long Tang, Xiao-Ling Zhang, Xian-Zhong Zheng, Bin Li, Wen-Tao Luo, Wei Liu, Jian Wang, Hong-Fei Zhang, Hao Liu, Jie Gao,..","doi":"10.3847/2041-8213/ad85da","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thanks to the rapidly increasing time-domain facilities, we are entering a golden era of research on gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). In this Letter, we report our observations of GRB 240529A with the Burst Optical Observer and Transient Exploring System, the 1.5 m telescope at Observatorio de Sierra Nevada, the 2.5 m Wide Field Survey Telescope of China, the Large Binocular Telescope, and the Telescopio Nazionale Galileo. The prompt emission of GRB 240529A shows two comparable energetic episodes separated by a quiescence time of roughly 400 s. Combining all available data on the GRB Coordinates Network, we reveal the simultaneous apparent X-ray plateau and optical rebrightening around 103–104 s after the burst. Rather than the energy injection from the magnetar as widely invoked for similar GRBs, the multiwavelength emissions could be better explained as two shocks launched from the central engine separately. The optical peak time and our numerical modeling suggest that the initial bulk Lorentz factor of the later shock is roughly 50, which indicates that the later jet should be accretion driven and have a higher mass loading than a typical one. The quiescence time between the two prompt emission episodes may be caused by the transition between different accretion states of a central magnetar or black hole, or the fallback accretion process. A sample of similar bursts with multiple emission episodes in the prompt phase and sufficient follow-up could help to probe the underlying physics of GRB central engines.","PeriodicalId":501814,"journal":{"name":"The Astrophysical Journal Letters","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Astrophysical Journal Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad85da","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Thanks to the rapidly increasing time-domain facilities, we are entering a golden era of research on gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). In this Letter, we report our observations of GRB 240529A with the Burst Optical Observer and Transient Exploring System, the 1.5 m telescope at Observatorio de Sierra Nevada, the 2.5 m Wide Field Survey Telescope of China, the Large Binocular Telescope, and the Telescopio Nazionale Galileo. The prompt emission of GRB 240529A shows two comparable energetic episodes separated by a quiescence time of roughly 400 s. Combining all available data on the GRB Coordinates Network, we reveal the simultaneous apparent X-ray plateau and optical rebrightening around 103–104 s after the burst. Rather than the energy injection from the magnetar as widely invoked for similar GRBs, the multiwavelength emissions could be better explained as two shocks launched from the central engine separately. The optical peak time and our numerical modeling suggest that the initial bulk Lorentz factor of the later shock is roughly 50, which indicates that the later jet should be accretion driven and have a higher mass loading than a typical one. The quiescence time between the two prompt emission episodes may be caused by the transition between different accretion states of a central magnetar or black hole, or the fallback accretion process. A sample of similar bursts with multiple emission episodes in the prompt phase and sufficient follow-up could help to probe the underlying physics of GRB central engines.
由于时域设施的迅速增加,我们正在进入伽马射线暴(GRB)研究的黄金时代。在这封信中,我们报告了利用爆发光学观测器和瞬变探索系统、内华达山脉观测站的 1.5 米望远镜、中国的 2.5 米宽视场巡天望远镜、大型双筒望远镜和伽利略国家望远镜对 GRB 240529A 的观测结果。结合 GRB 坐标网的所有可用数据,我们揭示了在爆发后 103-104 秒左右同时出现的明显 X 射线高原和光学再增亮。与其说类似的 GRB 都是由磁星注入能量,不如说多波长辐射是由中央引擎分别发射的两个冲击波造成的。光学峰值时间和我们的数值建模表明,后一个冲击的初始体洛伦兹系数大约为 50,这表明后一个喷流应该是吸积驱动的,其质量负荷要高于典型的喷流。两次脉冲发射之间的静止时间可能是由中心磁星或黑洞的不同吸积状态之间的转换或后退吸积过程造成的。对类似的爆发样本进行及时阶段的多次发射和充分的跟踪,有助于探测GRB中心引擎的基本物理学原理。