Pathologic and clinical correlates of region-specific brain GFAP in Alzheimer’s disease

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Acta Neuropathologica Pub Date : 2024-11-24 DOI:10.1007/s00401-024-02828-5
Jared M. Phillips, Rebecca L. Winfree, Mabel Seto, Julie A. Schneider, David A. Bennett, Logan C. Dumitrescu, Timothy J. Hohman
{"title":"Pathologic and clinical correlates of region-specific brain GFAP in Alzheimer’s disease","authors":"Jared M. Phillips,&nbsp;Rebecca L. Winfree,&nbsp;Mabel Seto,&nbsp;Julie A. Schneider,&nbsp;David A. Bennett,&nbsp;Logan C. Dumitrescu,&nbsp;Timothy J. Hohman","doi":"10.1007/s00401-024-02828-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is an emerging biomarker of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), with higher blood GFAP levels linked to faster cognitive decline, particularly among individuals with high brain amyloid burden. However, few studies have examined brain GFAP expression to clarify if peripheral associations reflect brain changes. This study aimed to correlate region-specific GFAP mRNA expression (<i>n</i> = 917) and protein abundance (n=386) with diverse neuropathological measures at autopsy in the Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROS/MAP) and to characterize the interaction between brain GFAP and brain amyloid burden on downstream outcomes. We assessed GFAP gene expression in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, caudate nucleus, and posterior cingulate cortex with respect to core AD pathology (amyloid-β and tau), cerebrovascular (microinfarcts, macroinfarcts, and cerebral amyloid angiopathy [CAA]), proteinopathic (TDP-43, Lewy bodies), and cognitive outcomes. These associations were further examined at the protein level using tandem-mass tag proteomic measurements from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. We also assessed GFAP interactions with AD neuropathology on downstream outcomes. Cortical GFAP gene and protein expression were significantly upregulated in participants with a neuropathologically confirmed AD diagnosis at autopsy (all P<sub>FDR</sub> &lt; 3.5e−4), but not in individuals positive for tau pathology and negative for amyloid pathology (all P<sub>FDR</sub> &gt; 0.05). Higher cortical GFAP levels were associated with increased amyloid pathology, CAA pathology, and faster cognitive decline (all P<sub>FDR</sub> &lt; 3.3e−3). GFAP’s associations with phosphorylated tau burden and cognition were influenced by amyloid burden, being most pronounced among amyloid-positive individuals, confirming previous in vivo biomarker observations. No associations were observed between <i>GFAP</i> gene expression and outcomes in the caudate nucleus. Our results support previous biomarker findings and suggest that higher brain GFAP levels are associated with higher brain amyloid burden and faster cognitive decline among amyloid-positive individuals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7012,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropathologica","volume":"148 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00401-024-02828-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropathologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00401-024-02828-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is an emerging biomarker of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), with higher blood GFAP levels linked to faster cognitive decline, particularly among individuals with high brain amyloid burden. However, few studies have examined brain GFAP expression to clarify if peripheral associations reflect brain changes. This study aimed to correlate region-specific GFAP mRNA expression (n = 917) and protein abundance (n=386) with diverse neuropathological measures at autopsy in the Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROS/MAP) and to characterize the interaction between brain GFAP and brain amyloid burden on downstream outcomes. We assessed GFAP gene expression in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, caudate nucleus, and posterior cingulate cortex with respect to core AD pathology (amyloid-β and tau), cerebrovascular (microinfarcts, macroinfarcts, and cerebral amyloid angiopathy [CAA]), proteinopathic (TDP-43, Lewy bodies), and cognitive outcomes. These associations were further examined at the protein level using tandem-mass tag proteomic measurements from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. We also assessed GFAP interactions with AD neuropathology on downstream outcomes. Cortical GFAP gene and protein expression were significantly upregulated in participants with a neuropathologically confirmed AD diagnosis at autopsy (all PFDR < 3.5e−4), but not in individuals positive for tau pathology and negative for amyloid pathology (all PFDR > 0.05). Higher cortical GFAP levels were associated with increased amyloid pathology, CAA pathology, and faster cognitive decline (all PFDR < 3.3e−3). GFAP’s associations with phosphorylated tau burden and cognition were influenced by amyloid burden, being most pronounced among amyloid-positive individuals, confirming previous in vivo biomarker observations. No associations were observed between GFAP gene expression and outcomes in the caudate nucleus. Our results support previous biomarker findings and suggest that higher brain GFAP levels are associated with higher brain amyloid burden and faster cognitive decline among amyloid-positive individuals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿尔茨海默病特定区域脑 GFAP 的病理和临床相关性
血浆胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)是阿尔茨海默病(AD)的一种新兴生物标志物,血液中 GFAP 水平越高,认知能力下降越快,尤其是在大脑淀粉样蛋白负荷较高的人群中。然而,很少有研究通过检测大脑 GFAP 的表达来明确外周关联是否反映了大脑的变化。本研究的目的是在宗教教派研究和拉什记忆与衰老项目(ROS/MAP)中,将特定区域的 GFAP mRNA 表达(n = 917)和蛋白丰度(n = 386)与尸检时的各种神经病理学指标相关联,并描述脑 GFAP 和脑淀粉样蛋白负荷对下游结果的相互作用。我们评估了背外侧前额叶皮层、尾状核和后扣带回皮层中的GFAP基因表达与AD核心病理(淀粉样蛋白-β和tau)、脑血管(微梗塞、大梗塞和脑淀粉样血管病[CAA])、蛋白病理(TDP-43、路易体)和认知结果之间的关系。通过对背外侧前额叶皮层进行串联质量标记蛋白质组学测量,我们在蛋白质水平上进一步研究了这些关联。我们还评估了 GFAP 与 AD 神经病理学在下游结果上的相互作用。在尸检时经神经病理学确诊为注意力缺失症的参与者中,皮质 GFAP 基因和蛋白表达明显上调(所有 PFDR 均为 3.5e-4),但在 tau 病理学阳性而淀粉样病理学阴性的个体中,皮质 GFAP 基因和蛋白表达没有明显上调(所有 PFDR 均为 0.05)。皮质 GFAP 水平越高,淀粉样病变、CAA 病变越多,认知能力下降越快(所有 PFDR 均为 3.3e-3)。GFAP与磷酸化tau负荷和认知能力的关系受淀粉样蛋白负荷的影响,在淀粉样蛋白阳性个体中最为明显,这证实了之前的体内生物标记物观察结果。在尾状核中未观察到 GFAP 基因表达与结果之间的关联。我们的研究结果支持之前的生物标志物研究结果,并表明大脑GFAP水平越高,大脑淀粉样蛋白负荷越高,淀粉样蛋白阳性者的认知能力下降越快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Neuropathologica
Acta Neuropathologica 医学-病理学
CiteScore
23.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Neuropathologica publishes top-quality papers on the pathology of neurological diseases and experimental studies on molecular and cellular mechanisms using in vitro and in vivo models, ideally validated by analysis of human tissues. The journal accepts Original Papers, Review Articles, Case Reports, and Scientific Correspondence (Letters). Manuscripts must adhere to ethical standards, including review by appropriate ethics committees for human studies and compliance with principles of laboratory animal care for animal experiments. Failure to comply may result in rejection of the manuscript, and authors are responsible for ensuring accuracy and adherence to these requirements.
期刊最新文献
Pathologic and clinical correlates of region-specific brain GFAP in Alzheimer’s disease Neuronal and oligodendroglial, but not astroglial, tau translates to in vivo tau PET signals in individuals with primary tauopathies Genome-wide methylation profiling differentiates benign from aggressive and metastatic pituitary neuroendocrine tumors Unsuccessful transmissions of atypical genetic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (PRNP p.T183A-129M) in transgenic mice Microglia contribute to the production of the amyloidogenic ABri peptide in familial British dementia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1