Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Practices of Graduates of a Blended-Learning Program: A Survey of Rheumatologists From the United States.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Arthritis Care & Research Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1002/acr.25470
Midori Nishio, Karina D Torralba, Sonja I Ziniel, Eugene Kissin, Fawad Aslam
{"title":"Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Practices of Graduates of a Blended-Learning Program: A Survey of Rheumatologists From the United States.","authors":"Midori Nishio, Karina D Torralba, Sonja I Ziniel, Eugene Kissin, Fawad Aslam","doi":"10.1002/acr.25470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Not much is known regarding musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) practices of rheumatologists in the United States. We sought to determine the current use of MSUS among past participants of the Ultrasound School of North American Rheumatologists (USSONAR) training program and, by extension, MSUS practicing rheumatologists and to understand barriers to its MSUS use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was sent to 374 participants in the 8-month USSONAR blended course (Fundamentals in MSUS and Train the Trainer) between 2009 and 2020. Each respondent had a unique identifier linked to their total number of submitted practice scans and examination scores during training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey response rate was 28.1% (105/374), comprising 82% adult and 18% pediatric rheumatologists. Of the respondents, 71% were MSUS certified: 86.7% performed and/or interpreted diagnostic MSUS, 81.0% performed/interpreted procedural MSUS, 59.8% billed for at least 50% of diagnostic studies, and 78.8% billed for at least 50% of procedural studies. The top reasons for not doing diagnostic and procedural ultrasonography were lack of administrative support and limited time, respectively. For 25% of diagnostic ultrasonography and 12.9% of procedural ultrasonography, billing was done less than 50% of the time. Of the respondents, 78.0% reported that USSONAR training made them better rheumatologists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most USSONAR-trained rheumatologists are certified, practicing both diagnostic and procedural MSUS and billing for most of their work. However, a substantial number of studies are not being billed due to time constraints, limited administrative support, and legal liability. Participants agreed that USSONAR training made them better rheumatologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25470","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Not much is known regarding musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) practices of rheumatologists in the United States. We sought to determine the current use of MSUS among past participants of the Ultrasound School of North American Rheumatologists (USSONAR) training program and, by extension, MSUS practicing rheumatologists and to understand barriers to its MSUS use.

Methods: An online survey was sent to 374 participants in the 8-month USSONAR blended course (Fundamentals in MSUS and Train the Trainer) between 2009 and 2020. Each respondent had a unique identifier linked to their total number of submitted practice scans and examination scores during training.

Results: The survey response rate was 28.1% (105/374), comprising 82% adult and 18% pediatric rheumatologists. Of the respondents, 71% were MSUS certified: 86.7% performed and/or interpreted diagnostic MSUS, 81.0% performed/interpreted procedural MSUS, 59.8% billed for at least 50% of diagnostic studies, and 78.8% billed for at least 50% of procedural studies. The top reasons for not doing diagnostic and procedural ultrasonography were lack of administrative support and limited time, respectively. For 25% of diagnostic ultrasonography and 12.9% of procedural ultrasonography, billing was done less than 50% of the time. Of the respondents, 78.0% reported that USSONAR training made them better rheumatologists.

Conclusion: Most USSONAR-trained rheumatologists are certified, practicing both diagnostic and procedural MSUS and billing for most of their work. However, a substantial number of studies are not being billed due to time constraints, limited administrative support, and legal liability. Participants agreed that USSONAR training made them better rheumatologists.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合式学习课程毕业生的肌肉骨骼超声实践:美国风湿病学家调查。
目的:关于美国风湿病学家的肌肉骨骼超声(MSUS)实践,我们所知甚少。我们试图确定北美风湿病学家超声学校(USSONAR)培训项目的学员目前使用 MSUS 的情况,进而确定风湿病学家使用 MSUS 的情况,并了解使用 MSUS 的障碍:2009年至2020年间,374名学员参加了为期8个月的USSONAR混合课程(MSUS基础和培训师培训),我们向他们发送了一份在线调查。每位受访者都有一个唯一的标识符,该标识符与其在培训期间提交的练习扫描总数和考试成绩相关联:调查回复率为 28.1%(105/374),其中 82% 为成人风湿病学家,18% 为儿童风湿病学家。71%的受访者获得了 MSUS 证书:86.7%的受访者进行和/或解释了诊断性MSUS,81.0%的受访者进行/解释了程序性MSUS,59.8%的受访者至少为50%的诊断性研究开具了账单,78.8%的受访者至少为50%的程序性研究开具了账单。不进行诊断性和程序性超声检查的首要原因分别是缺乏行政支持和时间有限。在 25% 的诊断性超声检查和 12.9% 的程序性超声检查中,计费率低于 50%。78.0%的受访者表示,USSONAR培训使他们成为了更好的风湿病医生:结论:大多数接受过 USSONAR 培训的风湿病学家都获得了认证,可以同时进行 MSUS 诊断和手术,并对其大部分工作进行收费。然而,由于时间限制、行政支持有限以及法律责任等原因,大量研究并未计费。与会者一致认为,USSONAR培训使他们成为了更好的风湿病学家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
368
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.
期刊最新文献
Incidence of side effects associated with acetaminophen in people aged 65 years or more: a prospective cohort study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Introduction to the Special Theme Issue: Environmental & Geographical Factors & Rheumatic Disease. Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Practices of Graduates of a Blended-Learning Program: A Survey of Rheumatologists From the United States. Barriers to Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Comparison of High-Poverty and Low-Poverty Communities. Immunosuppressive Drugs in Early Limited Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis May Prevent Global Damage Accrual.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1