PBPK modelling for the evaluation of drug-drug interaction between meropenem and valproic acid.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY British journal of clinical pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1111/bcp.16350
Hongrui Liu, Yiqun Yu, Yulin Qin, Bing Han
{"title":"PBPK modelling for the evaluation of drug-drug interaction between meropenem and valproic acid.","authors":"Hongrui Liu, Yiqun Yu, Yulin Qin, Bing Han","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The present study aimed to quantitatively investigate the potential drug-drug interaction (DDI) mechanism between meropenem (MEPM) and valproic acid (VPA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the present study, we firstly developed a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of MEPM and VPA. The verified PBPK model was then used to quantitatively investigate the potential DDI between MEPM and VPA. The effect of genetic polymorphisms of acylpeptide hydrolase (APEH) on DDI was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our simulation, the plasma concentration of hydrolysate of VPAG decreased to 63% when combined with MEPM. Total plasma concentration of VPA before carbapenem use was 53.61 mg/L, whereas it was 45.42 mg/L during carbapenem use. The inhibition of hydrolysis of VPAG by MEPM alone could not result in a rapid and substantial decrease in the plasma concentration of VPA. Parameter sensitivity analysis showed that the changes of absorption played an important role in the maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) of VPA, whereas area under the plasma concentration-time profile (AUC) was more susceptible to elimination changes. In addition, a decrease in APEH activity had little impact on the plasma pharmacokinetics of VPA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DDI between MEPM and VPA might be a comprehensive result of multiple factors. On the basis of our simulation, interval medication of MEPM injection and VPA immediate release tablet at 4-6 h timed interval was recommended, or intravenous administration of VPA solution was preferred when combination regimen was necessary in a clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16350","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The present study aimed to quantitatively investigate the potential drug-drug interaction (DDI) mechanism between meropenem (MEPM) and valproic acid (VPA).

Methods: In the present study, we firstly developed a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of MEPM and VPA. The verified PBPK model was then used to quantitatively investigate the potential DDI between MEPM and VPA. The effect of genetic polymorphisms of acylpeptide hydrolase (APEH) on DDI was also evaluated.

Results: In our simulation, the plasma concentration of hydrolysate of VPAG decreased to 63% when combined with MEPM. Total plasma concentration of VPA before carbapenem use was 53.61 mg/L, whereas it was 45.42 mg/L during carbapenem use. The inhibition of hydrolysis of VPAG by MEPM alone could not result in a rapid and substantial decrease in the plasma concentration of VPA. Parameter sensitivity analysis showed that the changes of absorption played an important role in the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of VPA, whereas area under the plasma concentration-time profile (AUC) was more susceptible to elimination changes. In addition, a decrease in APEH activity had little impact on the plasma pharmacokinetics of VPA.

Conclusions: The DDI between MEPM and VPA might be a comprehensive result of multiple factors. On the basis of our simulation, interval medication of MEPM injection and VPA immediate release tablet at 4-6 h timed interval was recommended, or intravenous administration of VPA solution was preferred when combination regimen was necessary in a clinical setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于评估美罗培南和丙戊酸之间药物相互作用的 PBPK 模型。
目的:本研究旨在定量研究美罗培南(MEPM)与丙戊酸(VPA)之间潜在的药物相互作用(DDI)机制:本研究首先建立了美罗培南和丙戊酸的生理学药代动力学(PBPK)模型。方法:本研究首先建立了基于生理学的药代动力学(PBPK)模型,然后利用验证后的 PBPK 模型对 MEPM 和 VPA 之间潜在的 DDI 进行定量研究。此外,还评估了酰肽水解酶(APEH)基因多态性对 DDI 的影响:结果:在我们的模拟中,当与 MEPM 合用时,VPAG 的水解物的血浆浓度降低了 63%。在使用碳青霉烯之前,血浆中 VPA 的总浓度为 53.61 mg/L,而在使用碳青霉烯期间,血浆中 VPA 的总浓度为 45.42 mg/L。MEPM 单独抑制 VPAG 的水解并不能使 VPA 的血浆浓度迅速大幅下降。参数敏感性分析表明,吸收的变化对 VPA 的最大血浆浓度(Cmax)起着重要作用,而血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)更易受消除变化的影响。此外,APEH活性的降低对VPA的血浆药代动力学影响很小:结论:MEPM 和 VPA 之间的 DDI 可能是多种因素综合作用的结果。结论:MEPM 和 VPA 之间的 DDI 可能是多种因素综合作用的结果。根据我们的模拟结果,建议在临床需要联合用药时,将 MEPM 注射液和 VPA 速释片剂定时间隔 4-6 小时服用,或静脉注射 VPA 溶液。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Alternative splicing with CYP3A4*22: Implications for the steroid-tacrolimus drug interaction. Analysis of factors influencing the relationship between voriconazole plasma concentrations and adverse effects in a paediatric population. Effect of hydration schedules on dose-limiting toxicity in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with cisplatin. Assessment of ethnic differences in pharmacokinetics and clinical responses of acalabrutinib between Chinese and White patients with B-cell malignancies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1