Effectiveness of geriatric rehabilitation in inpatient and day hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1186/s12916-024-03764-7
Eric K C Wong, Peter M Hoang, Andrew Kouri, Sandeep Gill, Yu Qing Huang, Janice C Lee, Sophie M Weiss, Raymond Daniel, Jessie McGowan, Krystle Amog, Joanna E M Sale, Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai, David M J Naimark, Andrea C Tricco, Sharon E Straus
{"title":"Effectiveness of geriatric rehabilitation in inpatient and day hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Eric K C Wong, Peter M Hoang, Andrew Kouri, Sandeep Gill, Yu Qing Huang, Janice C Lee, Sophie M Weiss, Raymond Daniel, Jessie McGowan, Krystle Amog, Joanna E M Sale, Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai, David M J Naimark, Andrea C Tricco, Sharon E Straus","doi":"10.1186/s12916-024-03764-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Geriatric rehabilitation is a multidisciplinary intervention that promotes functional recovery in older adults. Our objective was to assess the efficacy of geriatric rehabilitation in inpatient and geriatric day hospital settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, PEDro and AgeLine from inception to September 30, 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including older adults (age ≥ 65 years) undergoing geriatric rehabilitation (inpatient or day hospital) with a usual care comparator group. Primary outcome measures included mortality, long-term care home (LTCH) admission, and functional status. Secondary outcomes included discharge/remaining at home, functional improvement, length of stay, cognition, mood, and quality of life. Records were screened, abstracted and assessed for risk of bias (Cochrane Risk of Bias [RoB] 2) by two reviewers independently. We conducted a random effects meta-analysis to summarize risk ratios (RR, dichotomous outcomes) and standardized mean differences (SMD, continuous outcomes).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 5304 records screened, 29 studies (7999 patients) met eligibility criteria. There were 23 RCTs of inpatient geriatric rehabilitation (6428 patients) and six of geriatric day hospital (1571 patients) reporting outcomes of mortality (26 studies), LTCH admission (22 studies), functional status (19 studies), length of stay (18 studies), cognition (5 studies), mood (5 studies) and quality of life (6 studies). The primary outcome of mortality at longest follow up was lower in the rehabilitation group (RR 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76 to 0.93, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). LTCH admission was lower in the rehabilitation group at longest follow up (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.98, I<sup>2</sup> = 8%). Functional status was better in the rehabilitation group at longest follow up (SMD 0.09, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.16, I<sup>2</sup> = 24%). Cognition was improved in the rehabilitation group (mean difference of mini-mental status exam score 0.97, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.60, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). No difference was found for patient length of stay, mood, or quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Geriatric rehabilitation in inpatient and day hospital settings reduced mortality, LTCH admission, and functional impairment. Future studies should explore implementation of this intervention for older adults.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO: CRD42022345078.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"22 1","pages":"551"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03764-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Geriatric rehabilitation is a multidisciplinary intervention that promotes functional recovery in older adults. Our objective was to assess the efficacy of geriatric rehabilitation in inpatient and geriatric day hospital settings.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, PEDro and AgeLine from inception to September 30, 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including older adults (age ≥ 65 years) undergoing geriatric rehabilitation (inpatient or day hospital) with a usual care comparator group. Primary outcome measures included mortality, long-term care home (LTCH) admission, and functional status. Secondary outcomes included discharge/remaining at home, functional improvement, length of stay, cognition, mood, and quality of life. Records were screened, abstracted and assessed for risk of bias (Cochrane Risk of Bias [RoB] 2) by two reviewers independently. We conducted a random effects meta-analysis to summarize risk ratios (RR, dichotomous outcomes) and standardized mean differences (SMD, continuous outcomes).

Results: Of the 5304 records screened, 29 studies (7999 patients) met eligibility criteria. There were 23 RCTs of inpatient geriatric rehabilitation (6428 patients) and six of geriatric day hospital (1571 patients) reporting outcomes of mortality (26 studies), LTCH admission (22 studies), functional status (19 studies), length of stay (18 studies), cognition (5 studies), mood (5 studies) and quality of life (6 studies). The primary outcome of mortality at longest follow up was lower in the rehabilitation group (RR 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76 to 0.93, I2 = 0%). LTCH admission was lower in the rehabilitation group at longest follow up (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.98, I2 = 8%). Functional status was better in the rehabilitation group at longest follow up (SMD 0.09, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.16, I2 = 24%). Cognition was improved in the rehabilitation group (mean difference of mini-mental status exam score 0.97, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.60, I2 = 0%). No difference was found for patient length of stay, mood, or quality of life.

Conclusions: Geriatric rehabilitation in inpatient and day hospital settings reduced mortality, LTCH admission, and functional impairment. Future studies should explore implementation of this intervention for older adults.

Review registration: PROSPERO: CRD42022345078.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院和日间医院环境下老年康复的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:老年康复是一种促进老年人功能恢复的多学科干预措施。我们的目标是评估老年康复在住院和老年日间医院环境中的疗效:我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、PsycINFO、PEDro 和 AgeLine 从开始到 2022 年 9 月 30 日的随机对照试验(RCT),包括接受老年康复治疗(住院或日间医院)的老年人(年龄≥ 65 岁)和常规护理比较组。主要结果指标包括死亡率、长期护理院(LTCH)入院率和功能状态。次要结果包括出院/留在家中、功能改善、住院时间、认知能力、情绪和生活质量。记录由两名审稿人独立筛选、摘录并评估偏倚风险(Cochrane Risk of Bias [RoB] 2)。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析,总结了风险比(RR,二分结果)和标准化平均差(SMD,连续结果):在筛选出的 5304 份记录中,有 29 项研究(7999 名患者)符合资格标准。其中有 23 项关于老年康复住院患者(6428 名患者)和 6 项关于老年日间医院(1571 名患者)的研究,报告了死亡率(26 项研究)、长期住院(22 项研究)、功能状态(19 项研究)、住院时间(18 项研究)、认知(5 项研究)、情绪(5 项研究)和生活质量(6 项研究)的结果。康复组患者在最长随访期内的主要死亡率较低(RR 0.84,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.76 至 0.93,I2 = 0%)。在最长随访期内,康复组入住长期住院治疗的比例较低(RR 0.86,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.75 至 0.98,I2 = 8%)。随访时间最长的康复组患者的功能状态更好(SMD 0.09,95% CI 0.02 至 0.16,I2 = 24%)。康复组患者的认知能力有所改善(迷你精神状态检查评分的平均差异为 0.97,95% CI 为 0.35 至 1.60,I2 = 0%)。在住院时间、情绪和生活质量方面没有发现差异:结论:在住院和日间医院环境中进行老年康复治疗可降低死亡率、长期住院率和功能障碍。未来的研究应探讨如何对老年人实施这一干预措施:prospero:CRD42022345078。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of geriatric rehabilitation in inpatient and day hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Estimation of physiological aging based on routine clinical biomarkers: a prospective cohort study in elderly Chinese and the UK Biobank. Prevalence and uptake of vaping among people who have quit smoking: a population study in England, 2013-2024. Economic costs attributable to modifiable risk factors: an analysis of 24 million urban residents in China. Longitudinal decline in DAT binding in Parkinson's disease: connections with sleep disturbances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1