Airway, breathing, cellphone: a new vital sign?

IF 2 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE International Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1186/s12245-024-00769-0
Samuel I Garcia, Ashley Jacobson, Gregory P Moore, Jesse Frank, Wyatt Gifford, Samantha Johnson, Donell Lazaro-Paulina, Aidan Mullan, Alexander S Finch
{"title":"Airway, breathing, cellphone: a new vital sign?","authors":"Samuel I Garcia, Ashley Jacobson, Gregory P Moore, Jesse Frank, Wyatt Gifford, Samantha Johnson, Donell Lazaro-Paulina, Aidan Mullan, Alexander S Finch","doi":"10.1186/s12245-024-00769-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In emergency medicine, triage encompasses more than the initial prioritization of treatment; it also includes decisions about the most suitable level of care and disposition for each patient. However, the increasing use of mobile technology by patients in the emergency department (ED) introduces a new factor. This study aims to explore the relationship between patients' cellphone use at the time of initial assessment and final disposition in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted on 292 patients who presented to the ED between 9/1/2021 and 8/9/2022. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on their behavior during the initial assessment: actively using a cell phone (n = 32) or not using a cell phone (n = 259). Final disposition was dichotomously recorded as admission or discharge. Hospital admission, hospital observation, and admission to the ED observation unit were consolidated into the combined category of admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients not actively using their cell phone on initial assessment exhibited a discharge rate of 64%, while those engaged with their cellphones displayed notably higher dismissal rates at 94%. The calculated odds ratio (OR) of 8.4 (95% confidence interval: 1.96-36.0, p = 0.004) underscores a significantly heightened likelihood of dismissal among individuals actively using their cellphones, suggesting a potential association between cellphone use and a reduced probability of hospital admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study suggests an association between cellphone use during initial ED assessment and higher discharge rates. While this introduces a novel concept, the study's potential contribution to more informed and efficient triage decisions warrants careful consideration in future research and clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"17 1","pages":"177"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11583604/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-024-00769-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In emergency medicine, triage encompasses more than the initial prioritization of treatment; it also includes decisions about the most suitable level of care and disposition for each patient. However, the increasing use of mobile technology by patients in the emergency department (ED) introduces a new factor. This study aims to explore the relationship between patients' cellphone use at the time of initial assessment and final disposition in the ED.

Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted on 292 patients who presented to the ED between 9/1/2021 and 8/9/2022. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on their behavior during the initial assessment: actively using a cell phone (n = 32) or not using a cell phone (n = 259). Final disposition was dichotomously recorded as admission or discharge. Hospital admission, hospital observation, and admission to the ED observation unit were consolidated into the combined category of admission.

Results: Patients not actively using their cell phone on initial assessment exhibited a discharge rate of 64%, while those engaged with their cellphones displayed notably higher dismissal rates at 94%. The calculated odds ratio (OR) of 8.4 (95% confidence interval: 1.96-36.0, p = 0.004) underscores a significantly heightened likelihood of dismissal among individuals actively using their cellphones, suggesting a potential association between cellphone use and a reduced probability of hospital admission.

Conclusion: The study suggests an association between cellphone use during initial ED assessment and higher discharge rates. While this introduces a novel concept, the study's potential contribution to more informed and efficient triage decisions warrants careful consideration in future research and clinical applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气道、呼吸、手机:新的生命体征?
简介:在急诊医学中,分诊不仅包括初步确定治疗的优先顺序,还包括决定最合适的护理级别和对每位患者的处置。然而,急诊科(ED)患者越来越多地使用移动技术又带来了一个新的因素。本研究旨在探讨急诊科患者在初步评估时使用手机与最终处置之间的关系:本研究对 2021 年 1 月 9 日至 2022 年 9 月 8 日期间到急诊科就诊的 292 名患者进行了前瞻性横断面研究。根据患者在初次评估时的行为将其分为两组:积极使用手机(32 人)或不使用手机(259 人)。最终处置记录为入院或出院二分法。入院、住院观察和急诊观察室入院合并为入院类别:初步评估时未主动使用手机的患者出院率为 64%,而使用手机的患者出院率明显更高,达到 94%。计算得出的几率比(OR)为 8.4(95% 置信区间:1.96-36.0,P = 0.004),这表明积极使用手机的患者出院的可能性显著增加,这表明使用手机与降低入院概率之间存在潜在联系:研究表明,在急诊室初步评估期间使用手机与较高的出院率之间存在关联。虽然这引入了一个新概念,但该研究对做出更明智、更高效的分诊决策的潜在贡献值得在未来的研究和临床应用中认真考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments attained over the world and thus help the specialty forge ahead. It is directed towards physicians and medical personnel undergoing training or working within the field of Emergency Medicine. Medical students who are interested in pursuing a career in Emergency Medicine will also benefit from the journal. This is particularly useful for trainees in countries where the specialty is still in its infancy. Disciplines covered will include interesting clinical cases, the latest evidence-based practice and research developments in Emergency medicine including emergency pediatrics.
期刊最新文献
Successful transcatheter treatment of large right pulmonary artery to left atrial fistula: a case series and literature review. Airway, breathing, cellphone: a new vital sign? Impact of online expert interview-based research training on medical trainees' knowledge and confidence: a mixed-methods design. Fundamentals of emergency care support: a blended learning model to improve emergency and trauma care in a low-income country. Unveiling three accessory spleens in one patient: a rare case report and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1