Resting-state voxel-wise dynamic effective connectivity predicts risky decision-making in patients with bipolar disorder type I

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.11.024
Shanling Ji , Hongyong Zhang , Cong Zhou , Xia Liu , Chuanxin Liu , Hao Yu
{"title":"Resting-state voxel-wise dynamic effective connectivity predicts risky decision-making in patients with bipolar disorder type I","authors":"Shanling Ji ,&nbsp;Hongyong Zhang ,&nbsp;Cong Zhou ,&nbsp;Xia Liu ,&nbsp;Chuanxin Liu ,&nbsp;Hao Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.11.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Patients with Bipolar Disorder type I (BD-I) exhibit maladaptive risky decision-making, which is related to impulsivity, suicide attempts, and aggressive behavior. Currently, there is a lack of effective predictive methods for early intervention in risky behaviors for patients with BD-I. This study aimed to predict risky behavior in patients with BD-I using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). We included 48 patients with BD-I and 124 healthy controls (HC) and constructed voxel-wise functional connectivity (FC), dynamic FC (dFC), effective connectivity (EC), and dynamic EC (dEC) for each subject. The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) was employed to measure the risky decision-making of all participants. We applied connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM) with five regression algorithms to predict risky behaviors as well as Barratt Impulsivity Scale (BIS) scores. Results showed that the BD-I had significantly lower risky adjusted pump scores compared to HC. The dEC-based linear regression-CPM model exhibited significant predictive ability for the adjusted pump scores in BD-I, while no significant predictive power was observed in HC. Furthermore, this model successfully predicted non-planning impulsiveness, motor impulsiveness, and BIS total score, but failed for attentional impulsiveness in BD-I. These findings provide a foundation for future work in predicting risky behaviors of psychiatric patients by using voxel-wise dEC underlying resting state.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19142,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience","volume":"564 ","pages":"Pages 135-143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306452224006067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with Bipolar Disorder type I (BD-I) exhibit maladaptive risky decision-making, which is related to impulsivity, suicide attempts, and aggressive behavior. Currently, there is a lack of effective predictive methods for early intervention in risky behaviors for patients with BD-I. This study aimed to predict risky behavior in patients with BD-I using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). We included 48 patients with BD-I and 124 healthy controls (HC) and constructed voxel-wise functional connectivity (FC), dynamic FC (dFC), effective connectivity (EC), and dynamic EC (dEC) for each subject. The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) was employed to measure the risky decision-making of all participants. We applied connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM) with five regression algorithms to predict risky behaviors as well as Barratt Impulsivity Scale (BIS) scores. Results showed that the BD-I had significantly lower risky adjusted pump scores compared to HC. The dEC-based linear regression-CPM model exhibited significant predictive ability for the adjusted pump scores in BD-I, while no significant predictive power was observed in HC. Furthermore, this model successfully predicted non-planning impulsiveness, motor impulsiveness, and BIS total score, but failed for attentional impulsiveness in BD-I. These findings provide a foundation for future work in predicting risky behaviors of psychiatric patients by using voxel-wise dEC underlying resting state.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静息态体素动态有效连通性可预测双相情感障碍 I 型患者的风险决策。
躁郁症 I 型(BD-I)患者表现出适应不良的风险决策,这与冲动、自杀企图和攻击行为有关。目前,尚缺乏有效的预测方法对躁狂症 I 型患者的危险行为进行早期干预。本研究旨在利用静息态功能磁共振成像(rs-fMRI)预测 BD-I 患者的危险行为。我们纳入了 48 名 BD-I 患者和 124 名健康对照(HC),并为每个受试者构建了体素功能连通性(FC)、动态 FC(dFC)、有效连通性(EC)和动态 EC(dEC)。我们采用气球模拟风险任务(BART)来测量所有受试者的风险决策能力。我们采用了基于连接组的预测模型(CPM)和五种回归算法来预测危险行为和巴拉特冲动量表(BIS)得分。结果显示,与 HC 相比,BD-I 的风险调整泵得分明显较低。基于 dEC 的线性回归-CPM 模型对 BD-I 的调整后泵评分具有显著的预测能力,而对 HC 则没有显著的预测能力。此外,该模型成功预测了 BD-I 的非计划冲动、运动冲动和 BIS 总分,但未能预测注意力冲动。这些发现为今后利用静息状态下的体素密度预测精神病患者的危险行为奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience
Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
394
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Neuroscience publishes papers describing the results of original research on any aspect of the scientific study of the nervous system. Any paper, however short, will be considered for publication provided that it reports significant, new and carefully confirmed findings with full experimental details.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Beyond digestion: Exploring how the gut microbiota modulates human social behaviors Serpina3n in neonatal microglia mediates its protective role for damaged adult microglia by alleviating extracellular matrix remodeling-induced tunneling nanotubes degradation in a cell model of traumatic brain injury Dihydromyricetin ameliorates neurotoxicity induced by high glucose through restraining ferroptosis by inhibiting JNK-inflammation pathway in HT22 cells Sex differential effects of early maternal separation on PTSD susceptibility in adult rats accompanied by telomere shortening in the hippocampus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1