Prediction of Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage Before Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Machine Learning in Patients with Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion.
Haydn Hoffman, Joel Sequeiros Chirinos, Nickalus Khan, Christopher Nickele, Violiza Inoa, Lucas Elijovich, Cheran Elangovan, Balaji Krishnaiah, Daniel Hoit, Adam S Arthur, Nitin Goyal
{"title":"Prediction of Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage Before Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Machine Learning in Patients with Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion.","authors":"Haydn Hoffman, Joel Sequeiros Chirinos, Nickalus Khan, Christopher Nickele, Violiza Inoa, Lucas Elijovich, Cheran Elangovan, Balaji Krishnaiah, Daniel Hoit, Adam S Arthur, Nitin Goyal","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.11.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is associated with worse outcomes. We sought to develop and internally validate a machine learning (ML) model to predict sICH prior to MT in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive adults who underwent MT for internal carotid artery/M1/M2 occlusions at a single institution were reviewed. The data was split into 80% training and 20% hold-out test sets. 9 ML models were screened. The top performing ML model was compared to logistic regression and previously described clinical prediction models. SHapley Additive exPlanations were used to identify the most predictive features in the ML model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 497 patients met inclusion criteria. The top performing ML model was extreme gradient boosting. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the ML model on the test set was 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.89), which was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than the logistic regression model (0.54 [95% CI 0.33-0.76]). The ML model also performed significantly better than the TAG = TICI-ASPECTS-glucose score (0.69 [95% CI 0.55-0.85], P < 0.001), Systolic blood pressure-Time-Blood glucose-ASPECTS score (0.45 [95% CI 0.30-0.60], P < 0.001), and ChatGPT 4.0 (0.60 [95% CI 0.48-0.68], P < 0.001). Based on SHapley Additive exPlanations values the most predictive features of sICH in the ML model were lower Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score, lower collateral score, and higher presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An ML model accurately predicted sICH prior to MT. It performed better than a standard statistical model and previously described clinical prediction models.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"123455"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.11.038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is associated with worse outcomes. We sought to develop and internally validate a machine learning (ML) model to predict sICH prior to MT in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion.
Methods: Consecutive adults who underwent MT for internal carotid artery/M1/M2 occlusions at a single institution were reviewed. The data was split into 80% training and 20% hold-out test sets. 9 ML models were screened. The top performing ML model was compared to logistic regression and previously described clinical prediction models. SHapley Additive exPlanations were used to identify the most predictive features in the ML model.
Results: A total of 497 patients met inclusion criteria. The top performing ML model was extreme gradient boosting. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the ML model on the test set was 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.89), which was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than the logistic regression model (0.54 [95% CI 0.33-0.76]). The ML model also performed significantly better than the TAG = TICI-ASPECTS-glucose score (0.69 [95% CI 0.55-0.85], P < 0.001), Systolic blood pressure-Time-Blood glucose-ASPECTS score (0.45 [95% CI 0.30-0.60], P < 0.001), and ChatGPT 4.0 (0.60 [95% CI 0.48-0.68], P < 0.001). Based on SHapley Additive exPlanations values the most predictive features of sICH in the ML model were lower Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score, lower collateral score, and higher presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.
Conclusions: An ML model accurately predicted sICH prior to MT. It performed better than a standard statistical model and previously described clinical prediction models.
期刊介绍:
World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal''s mission is to:
-To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care.
-To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide.
-To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients.
Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS