Resistomes from oxytetracycline-treated pigs are readily transferred to untreated pen mates.

IF 4.9 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Animal microbiome Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1186/s42523-024-00356-x
Katrine Wegener Tams, Anders Rhod Larsen, Karl Pedersen, Anna Cäcilia Ingham, Anders Folkesson, Inge Larsen, Øystein Angen, Mikael Lenz Strube
{"title":"Resistomes from oxytetracycline-treated pigs are readily transferred to untreated pen mates.","authors":"Katrine Wegener Tams, Anders Rhod Larsen, Karl Pedersen, Anna Cäcilia Ingham, Anders Folkesson, Inge Larsen, Øystein Angen, Mikael Lenz Strube","doi":"10.1186/s42523-024-00356-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pork is currently a major part of Danish food export and is also a key dietary source of protein across the world. Industrial pork production, however, comes with high antibiotic usage in many countries, including Denmark. This has created consumer demand for meat Raised Without Antibiotics (RWA). Previous work has demonstrated that levels of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) are indeed increased in antibiotically treated animals, but also suggest that these ARGs are transferred to untreated pen-mates. In a Danish commercial farm, we studied four groups of physically separated pigs: one group of only antibiotic treated pigs (n = 20), one group of only untreated pigs (n = 30 total, n = 15 analysed), and one group combining treated (n = 15) and untreated pigs (n = 15). These groups were followed for 16 weeks during which all pigs were profiled for both their faecal microbiome (through 16 S rRNA gene sequencing) and resistome (by use of a high-throughput qPCR platform targeting 82 ARGs and their variants). We found that the resistome of treated pigs was substantially enriched in resistance genes compared to untreated pigs but, importantly, observed that untreated pigs co-reared with treated pigs had levels of resistance genes approaching their treated pen mates, suggesting that the treated enterotype is readily transferred to the untreated animal. From this, we conclude that mixing of treated and untreated pigs causes spill-over of antibiotic resistant bacteria and/or resistance genes from treated pigs when these are co-reared. To optimize RWA production, treated and untreated pigs should be physically separated to limit the proliferation of ARGs.</p>","PeriodicalId":72201,"journal":{"name":"Animal microbiome","volume":"6 1","pages":"70"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-024-00356-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pork is currently a major part of Danish food export and is also a key dietary source of protein across the world. Industrial pork production, however, comes with high antibiotic usage in many countries, including Denmark. This has created consumer demand for meat Raised Without Antibiotics (RWA). Previous work has demonstrated that levels of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) are indeed increased in antibiotically treated animals, but also suggest that these ARGs are transferred to untreated pen-mates. In a Danish commercial farm, we studied four groups of physically separated pigs: one group of only antibiotic treated pigs (n = 20), one group of only untreated pigs (n = 30 total, n = 15 analysed), and one group combining treated (n = 15) and untreated pigs (n = 15). These groups were followed for 16 weeks during which all pigs were profiled for both their faecal microbiome (through 16 S rRNA gene sequencing) and resistome (by use of a high-throughput qPCR platform targeting 82 ARGs and their variants). We found that the resistome of treated pigs was substantially enriched in resistance genes compared to untreated pigs but, importantly, observed that untreated pigs co-reared with treated pigs had levels of resistance genes approaching their treated pen mates, suggesting that the treated enterotype is readily transferred to the untreated animal. From this, we conclude that mixing of treated and untreated pigs causes spill-over of antibiotic resistant bacteria and/or resistance genes from treated pigs when these are co-reared. To optimize RWA production, treated and untreated pigs should be physically separated to limit the proliferation of ARGs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土霉素处理过的猪的抗原体很容易转移到未处理过的猪群中。
目前,猪肉是丹麦食品出口的主要部分,也是全世界主要的膳食蛋白质来源。然而,在包括丹麦在内的许多国家,工业化猪肉生产伴随着大量抗生素的使用。因此,消费者对无抗生素饲养肉类(RWA)产生了需求。之前的研究表明,经过抗生素治疗的动物体内抗生素耐药基因(ARGs)水平确实有所提高,但同时也表明,这些抗生素耐药基因会转移到未经治疗的圈养动物体内。在丹麦的一家商业农场,我们对四组物理隔离的猪进行了研究:一组是只接受过抗生素治疗的猪(n = 20),一组是只接受过未治疗的猪(总共 n = 30,n = 15 已分析),还有一组是将接受过治疗的猪(n = 15)和未接受过治疗的猪(n = 15)组合在一起。我们对这些小组进行了为期 16 周的跟踪研究,在此期间对所有猪的粪便微生物组(通过 16 S rRNA 基因测序)和抗药性组(通过使用针对 82 个 ARGs 及其变体的高通量 qPCR 平台)进行了分析。我们发现,与未处理的猪相比,处理过的猪的抗性基因组大大富集,但重要的是,我们观察到,与处理过的猪共同饲养的未处理猪的抗性基因水平接近处理过的猪,这表明处理过的肠型很容易转移到未处理的动物身上。由此,我们得出结论,当处理过的猪和未处理过的猪混合饲养时,会导致抗生素耐药菌和/或来自处理过的猪的耐药基因外溢。为优化 RWA 生产,应将处理过的猪和未处理过的猪物理隔离,以限制 ARGs 的扩散。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Resistomes from oxytetracycline-treated pigs are readily transferred to untreated pen mates. Industrial diet intervention modulates the interplay between gut microbiota and host in semi-stray dogs. Increasing the level of hemicelluloses in the lactation diet affects the faecal microbiota of sows and their piglets without affecting their performances. Single-strain probiotics enhance growth, anti-pathogen immunity, and resistance to Nocardia seriolae in grey mullet (Mugil cephalus) via gut microbiota modulation. Changes in social environment impact primate gut microbiota composition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1