Identifying Major Factors for Success and Failure of Conservation Programs in Europe.

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Management Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1007/s00267-024-02086-x
Nina Farwig, Philipp P Sprenger, Bruno Baur, Katrin Böhning-Gaese, Angelika Brandt, Nico Eisenhauer, Götz Ellwanger, Axel Hochkirch, Alexandros A Karamanlidis, Marion Mehring, Martin Pusch, Finn Rehling, Nike Sommerwerk, Theresa Spatz, Jens-Christian Svenning, Sabine Tischew, Klement Tockner, Teja Tscharntke, Alice B M Vadrot, Julian Taffner, Christine Fürst, Sonja C Jähnig, Volker Mosbrugger
{"title":"Identifying Major Factors for Success and Failure of Conservation Programs in Europe.","authors":"Nina Farwig, Philipp P Sprenger, Bruno Baur, Katrin Böhning-Gaese, Angelika Brandt, Nico Eisenhauer, Götz Ellwanger, Axel Hochkirch, Alexandros A Karamanlidis, Marion Mehring, Martin Pusch, Finn Rehling, Nike Sommerwerk, Theresa Spatz, Jens-Christian Svenning, Sabine Tischew, Klement Tockner, Teja Tscharntke, Alice B M Vadrot, Julian Taffner, Christine Fürst, Sonja C Jähnig, Volker Mosbrugger","doi":"10.1007/s00267-024-02086-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Europe, various conservation programs adopted to maintain or restore biodiversity have experienced differing levels of success. However, a synthesis about major factors for success of biodiversity-related conservation programs across ecosystems and national boundaries, such as incentives, subsidies, enforcement, participation, or spatial context, is missing. Using a balanced scorecard survey among experts, we analyzed and compared factors contributing to success or failure of three different conservation programs: two government programs (Natura 2000 and the ecological measures of the Water Framework Directive) and one conservation program of a non-governmental organization (NGO; Rewilding Europe), all focusing on habitat and species conservation. The experts perceived the NGO program as more successful in achieving biodiversity-related aims than governmental conservation legislation. Among the factors perceived to influence the success of biodiversity conservation, several stood out: Biodiversity-damaging subsidies, external economic interests competing with conservation goals or policies conflicting with biodiversity conservation were recognized as major factors for the lack of conservation success. Outreach to raise societal interest and awareness as well as stakeholder involvement were perceived as closely related to the success of programs. Our expert survey demonstrated that external factors from economy and policy often hinder success of conservation programs, while societal and environmental factors rather contribute to it. This study implies that conservation programs should be designed to be as inclusive as possible and provides a basis for developing a standardized methodology that explicitly considers indirect drivers from areas such as economy, policy and society.</p>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-024-02086-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Europe, various conservation programs adopted to maintain or restore biodiversity have experienced differing levels of success. However, a synthesis about major factors for success of biodiversity-related conservation programs across ecosystems and national boundaries, such as incentives, subsidies, enforcement, participation, or spatial context, is missing. Using a balanced scorecard survey among experts, we analyzed and compared factors contributing to success or failure of three different conservation programs: two government programs (Natura 2000 and the ecological measures of the Water Framework Directive) and one conservation program of a non-governmental organization (NGO; Rewilding Europe), all focusing on habitat and species conservation. The experts perceived the NGO program as more successful in achieving biodiversity-related aims than governmental conservation legislation. Among the factors perceived to influence the success of biodiversity conservation, several stood out: Biodiversity-damaging subsidies, external economic interests competing with conservation goals or policies conflicting with biodiversity conservation were recognized as major factors for the lack of conservation success. Outreach to raise societal interest and awareness as well as stakeholder involvement were perceived as closely related to the success of programs. Our expert survey demonstrated that external factors from economy and policy often hinder success of conservation programs, while societal and environmental factors rather contribute to it. This study implies that conservation programs should be designed to be as inclusive as possible and provides a basis for developing a standardized methodology that explicitly considers indirect drivers from areas such as economy, policy and society.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定欧洲保护计划成败的主要因素。
在欧洲,为保持或恢复生物多样性而采取的各种保护计划取得了不同程度的成功。然而,对于跨生态系统和跨国界的生物多样性相关保护计划成功的主要因素,如激励、补贴、执行、参与或空间环境等,却缺乏综合分析。通过对专家进行平衡计分卡调查,我们分析并比较了三个不同保护项目的成败因素:两个政府项目(Natura 2000 和《水框架指令》的生态措施)和一个非政府组织(NGO;野化欧洲)的保护项目,所有项目都侧重于栖息地和物种保护。专家们认为,在实现生物多样性相关目标方面,非政府组织计划比政府保护立法更成功。在影响生物多样性保护成功与否的因素中,有几个因素比较突出:破坏生物多样性的补贴、与保护目标相竞争的外部经济利益或与生物多样性保护相冲突的政策被认为是保护不成功的主要因素。提高社会兴趣和意识的外联活动以及利益相关者的参与被认为与计划的成功密切相关。我们的专家调查表明,来自经济和政策的外部因素往往会阻碍保护计划的成功,而社会和环境因素则会促成保护计划的成功。这项研究表明,保护计划的设计应尽可能具有包容性,并为制定明确考虑经济、政策和社会等领域间接驱动因素的标准化方法奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Management
Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more. As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.
期刊最新文献
Identifying Major Factors for Success and Failure of Conservation Programs in Europe. Application of High-pressure Carbon Dioxide in Japanese Anchovy Waste Recycling by Enzymatic Hydrolysis. Biogeographic Considerations for Fish-Based Indices of Stream Health in Regions with High Species Richness and Endemism: A Perspective from the Southeastern US. Cleansing our waters: how riffle fish communities in the Spring River of Kansas responded to pollution legislation, mining remediation, and improved water quality. Benchmarking Riparian Vegetation Quality in Recovering Rivers: Implications for Management of Novel Ecosystems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1