Tired and out of control? Effects of total and partial sleep deprivation on response inhibition under threat and no-threat conditions.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Sleep Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsae275
Arne Nieuwenhuys, Corey G Wadsley, Robyn Sullivan, John Cirillo, Winston D Byblow
{"title":"Tired and out of control? Effects of total and partial sleep deprivation on response inhibition under threat and no-threat conditions.","authors":"Arne Nieuwenhuys, Corey G Wadsley, Robyn Sullivan, John Cirillo, Winston D Byblow","doi":"10.1093/sleep/zsae275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Sleep deprivation may impair top-down inhibitory control over emotional responses (e.g., under threat). The current study examined behavioral consequences of this phenomenon and manipulated the magnitude of individuals' sleep deficit to determine effect thresholds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four healthy human participants were provided with 0hr, 2hr, 4hr and 8hr of sleep opportunity and, subsequently, performed a bimanual anticipatory response inhibition task under threat and no-threat conditions. Behavioral responses (button presses) and surface electromyography (EMG) from task effectors were collected to examine going and stopping processes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bayesian analyses revealed that compared to 8hr sleep, go trial accuracy was reduced with 0hr sleep. Stopping speed was reduced with 0hr and 2hr of sleep, as evidenced by longer stop-signal delays, but only in a selective stopping context. None of the outcome measures were impacted with 4hr sleep. Under threat, go trial accuracy was maintained, whilst responses were slightly delayed and characterized by amplified EMG-bursts. Stopping speed was increased under threat across both stop-all and selective stopping contexts. No evidence was observed for interactions between sleep and threat.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sleep deprivation negatively affected response inhibition in a selective stopping context, with stopping speed reduced following a single night of ≤ 2hr sleep. Performance-contingent threat improved response inhibition, possibly due to a prioritizing of stopping. No evidence was observed for increased threat-related responding after sleep deprivation, suggesting that sleep deprivation and threat may impact inhibitory control via independent mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":22018,"journal":{"name":"Sleep","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae275","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives: Sleep deprivation may impair top-down inhibitory control over emotional responses (e.g., under threat). The current study examined behavioral consequences of this phenomenon and manipulated the magnitude of individuals' sleep deficit to determine effect thresholds.

Methods: Twenty-four healthy human participants were provided with 0hr, 2hr, 4hr and 8hr of sleep opportunity and, subsequently, performed a bimanual anticipatory response inhibition task under threat and no-threat conditions. Behavioral responses (button presses) and surface electromyography (EMG) from task effectors were collected to examine going and stopping processes.

Results: Bayesian analyses revealed that compared to 8hr sleep, go trial accuracy was reduced with 0hr sleep. Stopping speed was reduced with 0hr and 2hr of sleep, as evidenced by longer stop-signal delays, but only in a selective stopping context. None of the outcome measures were impacted with 4hr sleep. Under threat, go trial accuracy was maintained, whilst responses were slightly delayed and characterized by amplified EMG-bursts. Stopping speed was increased under threat across both stop-all and selective stopping contexts. No evidence was observed for interactions between sleep and threat.

Conclusion: Sleep deprivation negatively affected response inhibition in a selective stopping context, with stopping speed reduced following a single night of ≤ 2hr sleep. Performance-contingent threat improved response inhibition, possibly due to a prioritizing of stopping. No evidence was observed for increased threat-related responding after sleep deprivation, suggesting that sleep deprivation and threat may impact inhibitory control via independent mechanisms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疲劳和失控?完全和部分剥夺睡眠对威胁和无威胁条件下反应抑制的影响。
研究目的:睡眠不足可能会损害对情绪反应(如受到威胁时)的自上而下的抑制控制。本研究考察了这一现象的行为后果,并通过操纵个体睡眠不足的程度来确定影响阈值:方法:24 名健康的人类参与者分别获得了 0 小时、2 小时、4 小时和 8 小时的睡眠机会,随后在威胁和无威胁条件下进行了双臂预期反应抑制任务。研究人员收集了行为反应(按下按钮)和来自任务效应器的表面肌电图(EMG),以检查进行和停止过程:贝叶斯分析表明,与 8 小时睡眠相比,0 小时睡眠会降低前进试验的准确性。0小时和2小时的睡眠会降低停止速度,这表现在停止信号延迟时间更长,但只在选择性停止的情况下。4小时睡眠对所有结果测量都没有影响。在受到威胁的情况下,go trial 的准确性得以保持,而反应则略有延迟,其特点是 EMG 爆发被放大。在全部停止和选择性停止两种情况下,停止速度在受到威胁时都会增加。没有证据表明睡眠和威胁之间存在相互作用:结论:睡眠不足会对选择性停止情境中的反应抑制产生负面影响,单晚睡眠不足 2 小时会降低停止速度。与表现相关的威胁会改善反应抑制,这可能是由于停止的优先次序。没有证据表明睡眠不足会增加与威胁相关的反应,这表明睡眠不足和威胁可能通过独立的机制影响抑制控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep
Sleep Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
10.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: SLEEP® publishes findings from studies conducted at any level of analysis, including: Genes Molecules Cells Physiology Neural systems and circuits Behavior and cognition Self-report SLEEP® publishes articles that use a wide variety of scientific approaches and address a broad range of topics. These may include, but are not limited to: Basic and neuroscience studies of sleep and circadian mechanisms In vitro and animal models of sleep, circadian rhythms, and human disorders Pre-clinical human investigations, including the measurement and manipulation of sleep and circadian rhythms Studies in clinical or population samples. These may address factors influencing sleep and circadian rhythms (e.g., development and aging, and social and environmental influences) and relationships between sleep, circadian rhythms, health, and disease Clinical trials, epidemiology studies, implementation, and dissemination research.
期刊最新文献
Tired and out of control? Effects of total and partial sleep deprivation on response inhibition under threat and no-threat conditions. Inferring Causality: Mendelian Randomization in Biomarker Studies in Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Talking to sleepwalkers? Response to communication efforts in Disorders of Arousals. The association between hypoxic burden and the risk of cognitive impairment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Factors influencing the PAP-adherence of elderly European sleep apnoea patients in the ESADA cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1