Conduction system pacing in heart failure: Time for a paradigm shift?

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart Failure Reviews Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1007/s10741-024-10469-9
Panayotis K Vlachakis, Panagiotis Theofilis, Anastasios Apostolos, Athanasios Kordalis, Skevos Sideris, Georgios Leventopoulos, Stavros E Mountantonakis, Georgios Kollias, Ioannis Leontsinis, Maria Drakopoulou, Paschalis Karakasis, Dimitrios Tousoulis, Konstantinos Toutouzas, Dimitrios Tsiachris, Konstantinos Gatzoulis, Costas Tsioufis
{"title":"Conduction system pacing in heart failure: Time for a paradigm shift?","authors":"Panayotis K Vlachakis, Panagiotis Theofilis, Anastasios Apostolos, Athanasios Kordalis, Skevos Sideris, Georgios Leventopoulos, Stavros E Mountantonakis, Georgios Kollias, Ioannis Leontsinis, Maria Drakopoulou, Paschalis Karakasis, Dimitrios Tousoulis, Konstantinos Toutouzas, Dimitrios Tsiachris, Konstantinos Gatzoulis, Costas Tsioufis","doi":"10.1007/s10741-024-10469-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heart failure (HF) is a major clinical challenge characterized by significant morbidity and mortality. Electrical conduction abnormalities play a critical role in HF pathophysiology and progression, often leading to suboptimal outcomes with conventional pacing techniques. Con-duction system pacing (CSP), encompassing His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing, has emerged as a novel approach. Despite data come from observational studies, recent guidelines recommend that a specific population may benefit from CSP. However, significant practical considerations and challenges need to be clarified before CSP can be routinely implemented in clinical practice. The reliance on observational studies means that long-term clinical outcomes for HF patients remain uncertain until data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) become available. Current CSP practices face challenges with lead implantation, mechanical stress on leads, and the need for more advanced tools and artificial intelligence integration to improve procedure efficacy and safety. Future large-scale RCTs are essential to identify optimal candidates and address these technical challenges, potentially leading to a paradigm shift in HF management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12950,"journal":{"name":"Heart Failure Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Failure Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-024-10469-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) is a major clinical challenge characterized by significant morbidity and mortality. Electrical conduction abnormalities play a critical role in HF pathophysiology and progression, often leading to suboptimal outcomes with conventional pacing techniques. Con-duction system pacing (CSP), encompassing His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing, has emerged as a novel approach. Despite data come from observational studies, recent guidelines recommend that a specific population may benefit from CSP. However, significant practical considerations and challenges need to be clarified before CSP can be routinely implemented in clinical practice. The reliance on observational studies means that long-term clinical outcomes for HF patients remain uncertain until data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) become available. Current CSP practices face challenges with lead implantation, mechanical stress on leads, and the need for more advanced tools and artificial intelligence integration to improve procedure efficacy and safety. Future large-scale RCTs are essential to identify optimal candidates and address these technical challenges, potentially leading to a paradigm shift in HF management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心力衰竭的传导系统起搏:范式转变的时机已到?
心力衰竭(HF)是一项重大的临床挑战,发病率和死亡率都很高。电传导异常在心力衰竭的病理生理学和发展过程中起着至关重要的作用,往往导致传统起搏技术的疗效不理想。传导系统起搏(CSP),包括 His 束起搏和左束支区起搏,已成为一种新方法。尽管数据来自观察性研究,但最近的指南建议特定人群可从 CSP 中获益。然而,在临床实践中常规实施 CSP 之前,还需要明确一些重要的实际考虑因素和挑战。对观察性研究的依赖意味着,在获得随机对照试验(RCT)的数据之前,高血压患者的长期临床结果仍不确定。目前的 CSP 实践面临着导联植入、导联机械应力等挑战,需要更先进的工具和人工智能集成来提高手术的有效性和安全性。未来的大规模随机对照试验对确定最佳候选者和解决这些技术难题至关重要,有可能导致高频管理模式的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Failure Reviews
Heart Failure Reviews 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart Failure Reviews is an international journal which develops links between basic scientists and clinical investigators, creating a unique, interdisciplinary dialogue focused on heart failure, its pathogenesis and treatment. The journal accordingly publishes papers in both basic and clinical research fields. Topics covered include clinical and surgical approaches to therapy, basic pharmacology, biochemistry, molecular biology, pathology, and electrophysiology. The reviews are comprehensive, expanding the reader''s knowledge base and awareness of current research and new findings in this rapidly growing field of cardiovascular medicine. All reviews are thoroughly peer-reviewed before publication.
期刊最新文献
Epigenetics of cardiomyopathies: the next frontier. Conduction system pacing in heart failure: Time for a paradigm shift? Could SGLT2 inhibitors improve outcomes in patients with heart failure and significant valvular heart disease? Need for action. Maternal heart failure: state-of-the-art review. Diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: European vs. American guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1