A qualitative systematic review of the impact of hearing on quality of life.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Quality of Life Research Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1007/s11136-024-03851-5
Nadine Henderson, Sian Hodgson, Brendan Mulhern, Katie Page, Chris Sampson
{"title":"A qualitative systematic review of the impact of hearing on quality of life.","authors":"Nadine Henderson, Sian Hodgson, Brendan Mulhern, Katie Page, Chris Sampson","doi":"10.1007/s11136-024-03851-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Hearing loss, deafness, and other hearing-related conditions can significantly impact quality of life; numerous qualitative studies have sought to describe these impacts. Synthesis of these findings may provide additional or more robust insights.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative systematic review of studies reporting qualitative data relating to the impact of hearing problems on adults' health-related quality of life. A subset of studies was included in the review and subsequently analysed using a thematic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search yielded 129 studies, of which 22 met our inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. The included studies, primarily from Australia, the UK, and the USA, involved approximately 450 participants with various hearing conditions. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were the most common data collection methods, with thematic analysis being the predominant analytical approach. Three overarching categories of descriptive themes were identified: Physical, Mental, and Social. Physical encompassed sound localization, sound clarity, speech, and physical fatigue. Social included relationships, isolation, communication, independence, work function, social stigma, and confidence. Mental encompassed depression, anxiety, listening effort, mental fatigue, fear, and identity. The identified themes shed light on the diverse domains of health-related quality of life affected by hearing conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Differences in hearing function impact upon people's health-related quality of life in a variety of ways relating to physical, mental, and social aspects of health, and these themes are clearly demonstrated across qualitative studies. These results will inform the development of hearing-specific questionnaire items for with the EQ-5D descriptive system, a commonly used patient-reported outcome measure.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03851-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Hearing loss, deafness, and other hearing-related conditions can significantly impact quality of life; numerous qualitative studies have sought to describe these impacts. Synthesis of these findings may provide additional or more robust insights.

Methods: A qualitative systematic review of studies reporting qualitative data relating to the impact of hearing problems on adults' health-related quality of life. A subset of studies was included in the review and subsequently analysed using a thematic approach.

Results: The literature search yielded 129 studies, of which 22 met our inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. The included studies, primarily from Australia, the UK, and the USA, involved approximately 450 participants with various hearing conditions. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were the most common data collection methods, with thematic analysis being the predominant analytical approach. Three overarching categories of descriptive themes were identified: Physical, Mental, and Social. Physical encompassed sound localization, sound clarity, speech, and physical fatigue. Social included relationships, isolation, communication, independence, work function, social stigma, and confidence. Mental encompassed depression, anxiety, listening effort, mental fatigue, fear, and identity. The identified themes shed light on the diverse domains of health-related quality of life affected by hearing conditions.

Conclusion: Differences in hearing function impact upon people's health-related quality of life in a variety of ways relating to physical, mental, and social aspects of health, and these themes are clearly demonstrated across qualitative studies. These results will inform the development of hearing-specific questionnaire items for with the EQ-5D descriptive system, a commonly used patient-reported outcome measure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
听力对生活质量影响的定性系统回顾。
目的:听力损失、耳聋和其他与听力相关的疾病会严重影响生活质量;许多定性研究试图描述这些影响。对这些研究结果进行综合分析可提供更多或更可靠的见解:方法:对报告听力问题对成年人健康相关生活质量影响的定性数据的研究进行定性系统回顾。研究子集被纳入综述,随后采用主题方法进行分析:文献检索共获得 129 项研究,其中 22 项符合我们的纳入标准并纳入分析。纳入的研究主要来自澳大利亚、英国和美国,涉及约 450 名患有各种听力疾病的参与者。半结构式访谈和焦点小组是最常见的数据收集方法,主题分析是最主要的分析方法。我们确定了三大类描述性主题:物理、心理和社会。身体包括声音定位、声音清晰度、语言和身体疲劳。社交包括人际关系、孤独感、沟通、独立性、工作功能、社会耻辱感和自信心。精神方面包括抑郁、焦虑、倾听努力、精神疲劳、恐惧和身份认同。所确定的主题揭示了受听力状况影响的与健康相关的生活质量的不同领域:结论:听力功能的差异对人们与健康相关的生活质量的影响是多方面的,涉及身体、精神和社会健康等方面,这些主题在定性研究中得到了清晰的体现。这些结果将为 EQ-5D 描述系统(一种常用的患者报告结果测量方法)听力特定问卷项目的开发提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
期刊最新文献
Myelofibrosis symptom assessment form total symptom score version 4.0: measurement properties from the MOMENTUM phase 3 study. Patient-reported health status in TTR amyloidosis: which yardstick to use? A qualitative systematic review of the impact of hearing on quality of life. Depressive and anxiety symptoms in current, previous, and no history of ME/CFS: NHIS 2022 analysis. Factors that impact the implementation of patient reported outcomes in routine clinical care for peripheral artery disease from the patient perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1