Prostate Cancer Screening and Diagnoses in the Transfeminine Population

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2024.11.029
Alex Stephens , Chase Morrison , Jonathan Lutchka , Caleb Richard , Keinnan Hares , Shane Tinsley , Akshay Sood , Briar Shannon , Craig Rogers , Jessica Shill , Nabeel Shakir , Firas Abdollah
{"title":"Prostate Cancer Screening and Diagnoses in the Transfeminine Population","authors":"Alex Stephens ,&nbsp;Chase Morrison ,&nbsp;Jonathan Lutchka ,&nbsp;Caleb Richard ,&nbsp;Keinnan Hares ,&nbsp;Shane Tinsley ,&nbsp;Akshay Sood ,&nbsp;Briar Shannon ,&nbsp;Craig Rogers ,&nbsp;Jessica Shill ,&nbsp;Nabeel Shakir ,&nbsp;Firas Abdollah","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2024.11.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine the frequency and rate at which transfeminine patients receive prostate-specific antigen testing compared to a matched cisgender cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with prostates who had encounters in our health system, are currently age 46 or older, and who are alive were included in our study. Transfeminine patients were identified through diagnosis codes and chart review. A 1:5 matched cohort was created based on patient age, race, and area deprivation index. Conditional logistic regression was done to compare odds of receiving any testing and Poisson regression was done to compare the total tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 275,112 patients were included in the study, of which 315 were confirmed to be transfeminine. A well-matched 1:5 propensity-matched cohort was created. Our results suggest that transfeminine patients were 0.28 (95% CI 0.20-0.38, <em>P</em> &lt;.001) times as likely as cisgender patients to receive at least 1 PSA test at our institution and received only 32% (95% CI 27%-37%, <em>P</em> &lt;.001) as many total PSA tests.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Until more is known about the best practices for PSA testing in the transfeminine population, these patients should receive PSA testing. However, our results suggest that transfeminine patients are significantly less likely to receive any testing and significantly fewer tests in their lifetimes, which may represent a significant healthcare disparity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":"197 ","pages":"Pages 80-87"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429524010835","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine the frequency and rate at which transfeminine patients receive prostate-specific antigen testing compared to a matched cisgender cohort.

Methods

Patients with prostates who had encounters in our health system, are currently age 46 or older, and who are alive were included in our study. Transfeminine patients were identified through diagnosis codes and chart review. A 1:5 matched cohort was created based on patient age, race, and area deprivation index. Conditional logistic regression was done to compare odds of receiving any testing and Poisson regression was done to compare the total tests.

Results

A total of 275,112 patients were included in the study, of which 315 were confirmed to be transfeminine. A well-matched 1:5 propensity-matched cohort was created. Our results suggest that transfeminine patients were 0.28 (95% CI 0.20-0.38, P <.001) times as likely as cisgender patients to receive at least 1 PSA test at our institution and received only 32% (95% CI 27%-37%, P <.001) as many total PSA tests.

Conclusion

Until more is known about the best practices for PSA testing in the transfeminine population, these patients should receive PSA testing. However, our results suggest that transfeminine patients are significantly less likely to receive any testing and significantly fewer tests in their lifetimes, which may represent a significant healthcare disparity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨女性群体中的前列腺癌筛查和诊断。
目的与匹配的顺性别人群相比,研究变性患者接受前列腺特异性抗原检测的频率和比例:研究对象包括在本医疗系统就诊过的前列腺患者,年龄在 46 岁或以上且存活。通过诊断代码和病历审查确定跨性别患者。根据患者的年龄、种族和地区贫困指数建立了 1:5 的匹配队列。通过条件逻辑回归比较接受任何检测的几率,通过泊松回归比较检测总数:研究共纳入了 275 112 名患者,其中 315 人被确认为女性输血者。我们建立了一个匹配度很高的 1:5 倾向匹配队列。我们的研究结果表明,经阴道输血患者的死亡率为 0.28 (95% CI 0.20 - 0.38, pConclusion):在对输血女性人群进行 PSA 检测的最佳实践有更多了解之前,这些患者应接受 PSA 检测。然而,我们的研究结果表明,输血女性患者接受任何检测的可能性要低得多,而且在其一生中接受的检测次数也要少得多,这可能代表了一种重大的医疗保健差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urology
Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Comment on "Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Intravesical Botulinum Toxin Injections: A Provider-Based Evaluation. Editorial Comment on "Phimosis Treatment and Risk of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection in Infant Males: A Systematic Review". Editorial Comment on "Performance of a Standardized Retrograde Urethrogram to Optimize LSE Anterior Urethral Stricture Disease Classification and Staging". Global Examination of Health Literacy in Urologic Malignancies. EDITORIAL COMMENT ON "Salvage Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement After Sling Failure: Long-Term Outcomes and Institutional Predictors in a Population-Based Cohort".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1