Reevaluating Diabetes and COVID-19 outcomes using national-level data.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Annals of Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1016/j.annepidem.2024.11.002
SuJung Jung, Ji Young Choi, Pradeep Tiwari, Itai M Magodoro, Shivani A Patel, Ahlam Jadalla, Daesung Choi
{"title":"Reevaluating Diabetes and COVID-19 outcomes using national-level data.","authors":"SuJung Jung, Ji Young Choi, Pradeep Tiwari, Itai M Magodoro, Shivani A Patel, Ahlam Jadalla, Daesung Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Using a US nationally representative survey of adults, we aimed to evaluate the association between prevalent diabetes and the uptake of COVID-19 testing, rate of positive testing and symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were sourced from the 2020-2021 National Health Interview Survey. COVID-19 outcomes were defined as: (1) test uptake (2) test positivity (3) diagnosis of COVID-19 and (4) severe disease symptoms with a positive COVID-19 test result. We compared the prevalence of COVID-19 outcomes by diabetes status and examined their associations using multivariate adjusted logistic and ordered logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of test uptake and test positivity were 50.7% and 9.4% in the US population, respectively. 10.3% were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection by health professionals. There were no statistically significant differences in the outcomes by diabetes status. However, individuals with diabetes were more likely to have severe symptoms. In adjusted regression model, we found no significant associations of diagnosed diabetes with all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings contrast with prior evidence derived from hospitalized patients. Researchers and policy makers are encouraged to review the properties of data sources and their impact on public health recommendations, particularly in response to future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2024.11.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Using a US nationally representative survey of adults, we aimed to evaluate the association between prevalent diabetes and the uptake of COVID-19 testing, rate of positive testing and symptom severity.

Methods: Data were sourced from the 2020-2021 National Health Interview Survey. COVID-19 outcomes were defined as: (1) test uptake (2) test positivity (3) diagnosis of COVID-19 and (4) severe disease symptoms with a positive COVID-19 test result. We compared the prevalence of COVID-19 outcomes by diabetes status and examined their associations using multivariate adjusted logistic and ordered logistic regression models.

Results: The prevalence of test uptake and test positivity were 50.7% and 9.4% in the US population, respectively. 10.3% were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection by health professionals. There were no statistically significant differences in the outcomes by diabetes status. However, individuals with diabetes were more likely to have severe symptoms. In adjusted regression model, we found no significant associations of diagnosed diabetes with all outcomes.

Conclusions: Our findings contrast with prior evidence derived from hospitalized patients. Researchers and policy makers are encouraged to review the properties of data sources and their impact on public health recommendations, particularly in response to future pandemics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用国家级数据重新评估糖尿病和 COVID-19 结果。
目的:通过对美国成年人进行全国代表性调查,我们旨在评估糖尿病患病率与 COVID-19 检测接受率、检测阳性率和症状严重程度之间的关联:数据来源于 2020-2021 年全国健康访谈调查。COVID-19 结果定义为(1)检测接受率(2)检测阳性率(3)COVID-19 诊断率(4)COVID-19 检测结果呈阳性的严重疾病症状。我们比较了不同糖尿病状态下 COVID-19 结果的发生率,并使用多变量调整逻辑回归模型和有序逻辑回归模型研究了它们之间的关联:结果:在美国人口中,检测接受率和检测阳性率分别为 50.7% 和 9.4%。10.3%的人被医疗专业人员诊断为感染 COVID-19。不同糖尿病患者的检测结果没有明显的统计学差异。不过,糖尿病患者更有可能出现严重症状。在调整后的回归模型中,我们发现确诊的糖尿病与所有结果均无明显关联:我们的研究结果与之前从住院患者身上获得的证据形成了鲜明对比。我们鼓励研究人员和政策制定者审查数据来源的特性及其对公共卫生建议的影响,尤其是在应对未来的流行病时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Epidemiology
Annals of Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The journal emphasizes the application of epidemiologic methods to issues that affect the distribution and determinants of human illness in diverse contexts. Its primary focus is on chronic and acute conditions of diverse etiologies and of major importance to clinical medicine, public health, and health care delivery.
期刊最新文献
History of Arrest and Firearm Ownership Among Low-Income US Military Veterans. Reevaluating Diabetes and COVID-19 outcomes using national-level data. Trends and disparities in violence-related injury morbidity among pregnant and postpartum individuals Editorial Board Contextualizing the Conclusion Generator: From the ASA statement to PhD curriculum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1