Influence of reestablishing greater tuberosity angle on patient outcomes following greater tuberosity fractures.

André Castanheira, Pedro Amaro, Raul Alonso, Luís Pires
{"title":"Influence of reestablishing greater tuberosity angle on patient outcomes following greater tuberosity fractures.","authors":"André Castanheira, Pedro Amaro, Raul Alonso, Luís Pires","doi":"10.1007/s00590-024-04152-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess whether higher values of GTA after osteosynthesis of isolated greater tuberosity fractures were associated with worse functional and symptomatic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted from 2012 to 2024, including all patients with isolated greater tuberosity fractures undergoing osteosynthesis at a single institution. GTA measurements before and after osteosynthesis were recorded, along with the latest QuickDash score and constant shoulder score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four patients were recruited, with 25 undergoing osteosynthesis with cannulated screws and eight with anchors. Twenty-two patients self-administered the QuickDash score and completed the constant shoulder score. The average GTA before surgery was 84.2°, reducing to 62.2° post-surgery. The average constant score was 86.8, and the mean QuickDash score was 7.65. The method of osteosynthesis did not significantly influence GTA or the QuickDash and constant scores. Additionally, post-surgery GTA negatively correlated with the constant score (r = - 0.65, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with isolated greater tuberosity fractures undergoing osteosynthesis experience a change in GTA after surgery. However, they achieved satisfactory symptomatic and functional scores post-surgery. The method of osteosynthesis did not significantly influence the GTA or the QuickDash and constant scores. Furthermore, post-surgery GTA negatively correlated with the constant score.</p>","PeriodicalId":50484,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","volume":"35 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-04152-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to assess whether higher values of GTA after osteosynthesis of isolated greater tuberosity fractures were associated with worse functional and symptomatic outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted from 2012 to 2024, including all patients with isolated greater tuberosity fractures undergoing osteosynthesis at a single institution. GTA measurements before and after osteosynthesis were recorded, along with the latest QuickDash score and constant shoulder score.

Results: Thirty-four patients were recruited, with 25 undergoing osteosynthesis with cannulated screws and eight with anchors. Twenty-two patients self-administered the QuickDash score and completed the constant shoulder score. The average GTA before surgery was 84.2°, reducing to 62.2° post-surgery. The average constant score was 86.8, and the mean QuickDash score was 7.65. The method of osteosynthesis did not significantly influence GTA or the QuickDash and constant scores. Additionally, post-surgery GTA negatively correlated with the constant score (r = - 0.65, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Patients with isolated greater tuberosity fractures undergoing osteosynthesis experience a change in GTA after surgery. However, they achieved satisfactory symptomatic and functional scores post-surgery. The method of osteosynthesis did not significantly influence the GTA or the QuickDash and constant scores. Furthermore, post-surgery GTA negatively correlated with the constant score.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重建大结节角度对大结节骨折患者预后的影响
目的:本研究旨在评估孤立性大结节骨折骨结合术后较高的GTA值是否与较差的功能和症状预后有关:方法:从2012年至2024年进行了一项回顾性分析,包括在一家机构接受骨合成术的所有孤立性大结节骨折患者。记录截骨前后的GTA测量值以及最新的QuickDash评分和恒定肩关节评分:共招募了34名患者,其中25人接受了带套管螺钉的骨合成术,8人接受了锚定术。22名患者自行进行了QuickDash评分,并完成了恒定肩关节评分。术前平均GTA为84.2°,术后降至62.2°。平均恒定评分为86.8分,平均QuickDash评分为7.65分。骨合成方法对GTA、QuickDash和常模评分没有明显影响。此外,手术后 GTA 与常量评分呈负相关(r = - 0.65,p 结论:手术后 GTA 与常量评分呈负相关:接受骨合成术的孤立性大结节骨折患者术后 GTA 会发生变化。然而,他们在术后获得了满意的症状和功能评分。截骨方法对GTA、QuickDash和常模评分没有明显影响。此外,术后 GTA 与恒定评分呈负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST) aims to publish high quality Orthopedic scientific work. The objective of our journal is to disseminate meaningful, impactful, clinically relevant work from each and every region of the world, that has the potential to change and or inform clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Clinical and epidemiological differences in staphylococcal osteoarticular infections: insights for developing hospital-based infection control interventions. Outcomes of intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation for humeral shaft fractures: a retrospective cohort study. Metaphyseal distal radius fractures in adolescents: is closed reduction and casting sufficient for most? One-stage posterior-only correction in severe and rigid scoliosis exceeding 90°: radiographic and surgical outcomes. Comparative analysis of modified posterior mini-open surgery versus standard open posterior approach for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correction: a prospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1