Verification of the radiant time factor (RTF) and convective time factor (CTF) for radiant systems in the buildings

IF 6.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Journal of building engineering Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111378
Baisong Ning, Xuehang Fu, Mengdi Zhang, Youming Chen
{"title":"Verification of the radiant time factor (RTF) and convective time factor (CTF) for radiant systems in the buildings","authors":"Baisong Ning, Xuehang Fu, Mengdi Zhang, Youming Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cooling loads of radiant systems in buildings differ from conventional all-air systems, yet current radiant system standards and guidelines still rely on the principles of all-air systems for their cooling load calculations. We previously developed a Radiant and Convective Time Series (RCTS) method specifically for radiant systems. However, the reliability and accuracy of the RTF and CTF in the method remain to be validated, which hindered the application of the method for radiant systems. This study verifies the RTF and CTF through comparison with two reputable models: the Nigusse model and EnergyPlus model. We started with a detailed case study, followed by parametric studies considering six impact factors. The results show that for all-air systems, the model has negligible differences for three indexes: sum of RTF, root mean square error, and peak load difference. For radiant systems, the RTF and CTF also closely match the other two models, albeit with relatively larger differences. Among the six factors, RTF and CTF are mainly influenced by room characteristics like size, thermal inertia, and exterior wall types, while less correlated to the heat gain schedule, density, or set-point temperatures. The new findings of the study are that: the RTF and CTF of radiant systems adhere to the transfer function principles; the RTF and CTF of RCTS method are rigorous and reliable parameters to calculate the cooling loads for radiant systems. The study offers valuable guidance for generating and validating RTF and CTF, which contributes to the application of radiant systems in buildings.","PeriodicalId":15064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of building engineering","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of building engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111378","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cooling loads of radiant systems in buildings differ from conventional all-air systems, yet current radiant system standards and guidelines still rely on the principles of all-air systems for their cooling load calculations. We previously developed a Radiant and Convective Time Series (RCTS) method specifically for radiant systems. However, the reliability and accuracy of the RTF and CTF in the method remain to be validated, which hindered the application of the method for radiant systems. This study verifies the RTF and CTF through comparison with two reputable models: the Nigusse model and EnergyPlus model. We started with a detailed case study, followed by parametric studies considering six impact factors. The results show that for all-air systems, the model has negligible differences for three indexes: sum of RTF, root mean square error, and peak load difference. For radiant systems, the RTF and CTF also closely match the other two models, albeit with relatively larger differences. Among the six factors, RTF and CTF are mainly influenced by room characteristics like size, thermal inertia, and exterior wall types, while less correlated to the heat gain schedule, density, or set-point temperatures. The new findings of the study are that: the RTF and CTF of radiant systems adhere to the transfer function principles; the RTF and CTF of RCTS method are rigorous and reliable parameters to calculate the cooling loads for radiant systems. The study offers valuable guidance for generating and validating RTF and CTF, which contributes to the application of radiant systems in buildings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证建筑物辐射系统的辐射时间系数(RTF)和对流时间系数(CTF)
建筑物中辐射系统的冷却负荷不同于传统的全空气系统,但目前的辐射系统标准和指南仍然依赖于全空气系统的冷却负荷计算原则。我们之前专门为辐射系统开发了一种辐射和对流时间序列 (RCTS) 方法。然而,该方法中的 RTF 和 CTF 的可靠性和准确性仍有待验证,这阻碍了该方法在辐射系统中的应用。本研究通过与两个著名的模型:Nigusse 模型和 EnergyPlus 模型进行比较,验证了 RTF 和 CTF。我们首先进行了详细的案例研究,然后考虑了六个影响因素进行了参数研究。结果表明,对于全空气系统,该模型在三个指标上的差异可以忽略不计:RTF 总和、均方根误差和峰值负荷差。对于辐射系统,RTF 和 CTF 也与其他两个模型接近,尽管差异相对较大。在这六个因素中,RTF 和 CTF 主要受房间大小、热惯性和外墙类型等房间特征的影响,而与得热时间表、密度或设定点温度的相关性较小。研究的新发现是:辐射系统的 RTF 和 CTF 符合传递函数原理;RCTS 方法的 RTF 和 CTF 是计算辐射系统冷负荷的严谨可靠的参数。该研究为生成和验证 RTF 和 CTF 提供了有价值的指导,有助于辐射系统在建筑中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of building engineering
Journal of building engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1901
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Building Engineering is an interdisciplinary journal that covers all aspects of science and technology concerned with the whole life cycle of the built environment; from the design phase through to construction, operation, performance, maintenance and its deterioration.
期刊最新文献
Bonding performance of Canadian hardwoods to produce glued laminated timber New char-based insulation foam by mechanical mixing method and the impact of ingredient contents on its properties Optimization research on the air infection intervention ability of interactive cascade ventilation in high-density building spaces Verification of the radiant time factor (RTF) and convective time factor (CTF) for radiant systems in the buildings A comprehensive review of building energy optimization using metaheuristic algorithms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1