Stereotactic body radiation therapy in primary liver tumor: Local control, outcomes and toxicities

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100892
Ludovic Hernandez , Laure Parent , Victoire Molinier , Bertrand Suc , Françoise Izar , Elisabeth Moyal , Jean-Marie Peron , Philippe Otal , Amélie Lusque , Anouchka Modesto
{"title":"Stereotactic body radiation therapy in primary liver tumor: Local control, outcomes and toxicities","authors":"Ludovic Hernandez ,&nbsp;Laure Parent ,&nbsp;Victoire Molinier ,&nbsp;Bertrand Suc ,&nbsp;Françoise Izar ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Moyal ,&nbsp;Jean-Marie Peron ,&nbsp;Philippe Otal ,&nbsp;Amélie Lusque ,&nbsp;Anouchka Modesto","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a therapeutic option in the guidelines for liver primaries after standard strategies like surgery or thermoablation have failed. To assess its efficacy and safety, we reviewed all patients treated by SBRT for a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over a six-year period.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><div>The study included all patients treated by SBRT for HCC between April 2015 and November 2021 in the University Cancer Institute at Toulouse-Oncopole. All patients were inoperable and not eligible for thermoablation, or after a failure. All tumor sizes were included and cirrhosis up to Child-Pugh B was accepted. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment response was assessed using mRECIST criteria. Toxicity was graded using CTCAE (v4.0).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred and nine patients with 118 lesions were treated. Half underwent prior standard treatment. Median dose was 50 Grays in five fractions for most patients. Chronic liver disease represented 90.8 % of cases with a median age of 69 years. Median tumor size was 4.0 cm. Median follow-up was 22.2 months [95 %CI: 15.1–30.4]. LC, OS and PFS at two years were 82.4 % [95 %CI: 71.3; 89.5], 73.2 % [95 %CI: 61.5; 81.8] and 35.8 % [95 %CI: 25.1; 46.7], respectively. Acute toxicities occurred in 20.2 % of patients, including 10.1 % grade 3–4 and 1.8 % grade 5. Late toxicities occurred in 5.5 % of patients including 4.6 % grade 3–4. Grade ≥ 3 toxicity was related to digestive perforation or liver failure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>SBRT provides good LC with an acceptable safety profile. It can be used in several settings such as salvage therapy or in combination with validated treatment. Prospective randomized trials are needed to validate SBRT as a standard alternative.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 100892"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001691","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a therapeutic option in the guidelines for liver primaries after standard strategies like surgery or thermoablation have failed. To assess its efficacy and safety, we reviewed all patients treated by SBRT for a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over a six-year period.

Methods and materials

The study included all patients treated by SBRT for HCC between April 2015 and November 2021 in the University Cancer Institute at Toulouse-Oncopole. All patients were inoperable and not eligible for thermoablation, or after a failure. All tumor sizes were included and cirrhosis up to Child-Pugh B was accepted. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment response was assessed using mRECIST criteria. Toxicity was graded using CTCAE (v4.0).

Results

One hundred and nine patients with 118 lesions were treated. Half underwent prior standard treatment. Median dose was 50 Grays in five fractions for most patients. Chronic liver disease represented 90.8 % of cases with a median age of 69 years. Median tumor size was 4.0 cm. Median follow-up was 22.2 months [95 %CI: 15.1–30.4]. LC, OS and PFS at two years were 82.4 % [95 %CI: 71.3; 89.5], 73.2 % [95 %CI: 61.5; 81.8] and 35.8 % [95 %CI: 25.1; 46.7], respectively. Acute toxicities occurred in 20.2 % of patients, including 10.1 % grade 3–4 and 1.8 % grade 5. Late toxicities occurred in 5.5 % of patients including 4.6 % grade 3–4. Grade ≥ 3 toxicity was related to digestive perforation or liver failure.

Conclusion

SBRT provides good LC with an acceptable safety profile. It can be used in several settings such as salvage therapy or in combination with validated treatment. Prospective randomized trials are needed to validate SBRT as a standard alternative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性肝肿瘤的立体定向体放射治疗:局部控制、疗效和毒性
目的立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)是手术或热消融等标准策略失败后,肝脏原发癌治疗指南中的一种治疗方案。为评估其疗效和安全性,我们回顾了六年来所有接受 SBRT 治疗的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者。所有患者均无法手术,不符合热消融条件,或治疗失败。所有肿瘤大小均包括在内,肝硬化程度达到Child-Pugh B均可接受。局部控制率(LC)、总生存率(OS)和无进展生存率(PFS)采用卡普兰-梅耶法估算。治疗反应采用 mRECIST 标准进行评估。采用 CTCAE(v4.0)对毒性进行分级。半数患者之前接受过标准治疗。大多数患者的中位剂量为50格雷,分5次进行。慢性肝病患者占 90.8%,中位年龄为 69 岁。肿瘤中位大小为 4.0 厘米。中位随访时间为 22.2 个月[95 %CI:15.1-30.4]。两年的LC、OS和PFS分别为82.4% [95 %CI: 71.3; 89.5]、73.2% [95 %CI: 61.5; 81.8]和35.8% [95 %CI: 25.1; 46.7]。20.2%的患者出现急性毒性反应,其中10.1%为3-4级,1.8%为5级。5.5%的患者出现晚期毒性反应,其中4.6%为3-4级。≥3级毒性与消化道穿孔或肝功能衰竭有关。它可用于多种情况,如挽救治疗或与有效治疗联合使用。需要进行前瞻性随机试验来验证 SBRT 作为标准替代疗法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Avoiding prostate bed radiation for the PSMA-PET detected nodal recurrence patient post prostatectomy Bridging the care gap: patients’ needs and experiences regarding shared decision-making in radiotherapy Tumor sequencing before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Genetic tumor characterization and clinical outcome Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of brainstem metastases – Clinical outcome and prognostic factors Stereotactic body radiation therapy in primary liver tumor: Local control, outcomes and toxicities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1