Study on multiphase flow modeling and parameter optimization design for bullheading

Xi Wang , Hui Liu , Min Zhao , Shikun Tong , Zhiyuan Wang , Yaxin Liu , FeiFei Zhang , Wenqiang Lou
{"title":"Study on multiphase flow modeling and parameter optimization design for bullheading","authors":"Xi Wang ,&nbsp;Hui Liu ,&nbsp;Min Zhao ,&nbsp;Shikun Tong ,&nbsp;Zhiyuan Wang ,&nbsp;Yaxin Liu ,&nbsp;FeiFei Zhang ,&nbsp;Wenqiang Lou","doi":"10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Deepwater and deepwell oil and gas drilling face complex environmental challenges. The limitations of conventional well control methods make it difficult to ensure the safety of wellbore pressure control. Bullheading is an efficient and simple well control technique for resolving complex kick problems, but the success rate of a single bullheading operation is low due to the inadequacy of well control parameter design. In this study, we first address critical challenges in designing critical bullheading displacement, calculating loss pressure, and characterizing reverse flow characteristics. We then propose a transient multiphase flow model and solution method for bullheading that comprehensively considers gas-liquid counterflow, formation loss, energy transfer, and PVT characteristics. By comparing simulation results with full-scale test wells and field construction parameters, the simulation errors were found to be less than 5% and 10%, respectively, verifying the accuracy of the model and method. Sensitivity analysis of bullheading parameters was conducted using the model, revealing that wellbore pressure is extremely sensitive to bullheading displacement and formation parameters. The combination of bullheading parameters within a safe range is constrained by the downward gas flow, the pressure limit of the blowout preventer, and the formation fracture pressure conditions. Based on the simulation results, we propose a bullheading parameter optimization design process. This work provides a comprehensive description of the response characteristics of wellbore flow parameters during bullheading and offers a theoretical basis for the optimization and control of bullheading parameters, helping to improve the safety of wellbore pressure control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100578,"journal":{"name":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","volume":"245 ","pages":"Article 213519"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949891024008893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deepwater and deepwell oil and gas drilling face complex environmental challenges. The limitations of conventional well control methods make it difficult to ensure the safety of wellbore pressure control. Bullheading is an efficient and simple well control technique for resolving complex kick problems, but the success rate of a single bullheading operation is low due to the inadequacy of well control parameter design. In this study, we first address critical challenges in designing critical bullheading displacement, calculating loss pressure, and characterizing reverse flow characteristics. We then propose a transient multiphase flow model and solution method for bullheading that comprehensively considers gas-liquid counterflow, formation loss, energy transfer, and PVT characteristics. By comparing simulation results with full-scale test wells and field construction parameters, the simulation errors were found to be less than 5% and 10%, respectively, verifying the accuracy of the model and method. Sensitivity analysis of bullheading parameters was conducted using the model, revealing that wellbore pressure is extremely sensitive to bullheading displacement and formation parameters. The combination of bullheading parameters within a safe range is constrained by the downward gas flow, the pressure limit of the blowout preventer, and the formation fracture pressure conditions. Based on the simulation results, we propose a bullheading parameter optimization design process. This work provides a comprehensive description of the response characteristics of wellbore flow parameters during bullheading and offers a theoretical basis for the optimization and control of bullheading parameters, helping to improve the safety of wellbore pressure control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牛头掘进多相流建模与参数优化设计研究
深水和深井油气钻探面临着复杂的环境挑战。传统井控方法的局限性使得井筒压力控制的安全性难以保证。顶牛是一种高效、简单的井控技术,可以解决复杂的井眼问题,但由于井控参数设计的不足,单次顶牛作业的成功率较低。在本研究中,我们首先解决了设计关键牛头位移、计算损失压力和表征反向流动特性等方面的关键难题。然后,我们提出了一种全面考虑气液逆流、地层损失、能量传递和 PVT 特性的瞬态多相流模型和牛头效应求解方法。通过将模拟结果与全尺寸试井和油田施工参数进行对比,发现模拟误差分别小于 5%和 10%,验证了模型和方法的准确性。利用该模型对掘进参数进行了敏感性分析,发现井筒压力对掘进位移和地层参数极为敏感。在安全范围内的牛头参数组合受制于下行气流、防喷器压力极限和地层裂缝压力条件。根据模拟结果,我们提出了一种牛头参数优化设计流程。这项工作全面描述了井筒流动参数在井喷过程中的响应特征,为井喷参数的优化和控制提供了理论依据,有助于提高井筒压力控制的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mechanism of microfracture propagation under mechanical–chemical coupling conditions considering dissolution Carbon steel pipeline CO2 erosion-corrosion damage prediction model and numerical simulation research Propped fracture conductivity in shale oil reservoirs: Prediction model and influencing factors Numerical study of using dual sources constructed via deconvolution to suppress the collar waves in acoustic logging while drilling Numerical investigation on heat extraction performance of supercritical CO2 in depleted oil and gas reservoirs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1