One-class classification with confound control for cognitive screening in older adults using gait, fingertapping, cognitive, and dual tasks

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computer methods and programs in biomedicine Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108508
Vânia Guimarães , Inês Sousa , Raquel Cunha , Rosana Magalhães , Álvaro Machado , Vera Fernandes , Sílvia Reis , Miguel Velhote Correia
{"title":"One-class classification with confound control for cognitive screening in older adults using gait, fingertapping, cognitive, and dual tasks","authors":"Vânia Guimarães ,&nbsp;Inês Sousa ,&nbsp;Raquel Cunha ,&nbsp;Rosana Magalhães ,&nbsp;Álvaro Machado ,&nbsp;Vera Fernandes ,&nbsp;Sílvia Reis ,&nbsp;Miguel Velhote Correia","doi":"10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objectives:</h3><div>Early detection of cognitive impairment is crucial for timely clinical interventions aimed at delaying progression to dementia. However, existing screening tools are not ideal for wide population screening. This study explores the potential of combining machine learning, specifically, one-class classification, with simpler and quicker motor-cognitive tasks to improve the early detection of cognitive impairment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>We gathered data on gait, fingertapping, cognitive, and dual tasks from older adults with mild cognitive impairment and healthy controls. Using one-class classification, we modeled the behavior of the majority group (healthy controls), identifying deviations from this behavior as abnormal. To account for confounding effects, we integrated confound regression into the classification pipeline. We evaluated the performance of individual tasks, as well as the combination of features (early fusion) and models (late fusion). Additionally, we compared the results with those from two-class classification and a standard cognitive screening test.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>We analyzed data from 37 healthy controls and 16 individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Results revealed that one-class classification had higher predictive accuracy for mild cognitive impairment, whereas two-class classification performed better in identifying healthy controls. Gait features yielded the best results for one-class classification. Combining individual models led to better performance than combining features from the different tasks. Notably, the one-class majority voting approach exhibited a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 75.7%, suggesting it may serve as a potential alternative to the standard cognitive screening test. In contrast, the two-class majority voting failed to improve the low sensitivities achieved by the individual models due to the underrepresentation of the impaired group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>Our preliminary results support the use of one-class classification with confound control to detect abnormal patterns of gait, fingertapping, cognitive, and dual tasks, to improve the early detection of cognitive impairment. Further research is necessary to substantiate the method’s effectiveness in broader clinical settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10624,"journal":{"name":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine","volume":"259 ","pages":"Article 108508"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169260724005017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives:

Early detection of cognitive impairment is crucial for timely clinical interventions aimed at delaying progression to dementia. However, existing screening tools are not ideal for wide population screening. This study explores the potential of combining machine learning, specifically, one-class classification, with simpler and quicker motor-cognitive tasks to improve the early detection of cognitive impairment.

Methods:

We gathered data on gait, fingertapping, cognitive, and dual tasks from older adults with mild cognitive impairment and healthy controls. Using one-class classification, we modeled the behavior of the majority group (healthy controls), identifying deviations from this behavior as abnormal. To account for confounding effects, we integrated confound regression into the classification pipeline. We evaluated the performance of individual tasks, as well as the combination of features (early fusion) and models (late fusion). Additionally, we compared the results with those from two-class classification and a standard cognitive screening test.

Results:

We analyzed data from 37 healthy controls and 16 individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Results revealed that one-class classification had higher predictive accuracy for mild cognitive impairment, whereas two-class classification performed better in identifying healthy controls. Gait features yielded the best results for one-class classification. Combining individual models led to better performance than combining features from the different tasks. Notably, the one-class majority voting approach exhibited a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 75.7%, suggesting it may serve as a potential alternative to the standard cognitive screening test. In contrast, the two-class majority voting failed to improve the low sensitivities achieved by the individual models due to the underrepresentation of the impaired group.

Conclusion:

Our preliminary results support the use of one-class classification with confound control to detect abnormal patterns of gait, fingertapping, cognitive, and dual tasks, to improve the early detection of cognitive impairment. Further research is necessary to substantiate the method’s effectiveness in broader clinical settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用步态、指法、认知和双重任务对老年人的认知筛查进行单类分类并进行混淆控制
背景和目的:早期发现认知功能障碍对于及时采取临床干预措施以延缓痴呆症的发展至关重要。然而,现有的筛查工具并不适合广泛的人群筛查。方法:我们收集了患有轻度认知障碍的老年人和健康对照组的步态、指法、认知和双重任务数据。通过单类分类法,我们对多数组(健康对照组)的行为进行了建模,并将偏离该行为的行为认定为异常。为了考虑混杂效应,我们将混杂回归整合到分类管道中。我们评估了单个任务的性能,以及特征(早期融合)和模型(后期融合)的组合。结果:我们分析了来自 37 名健康对照组和 16 名轻度认知障碍患者的数据。结果显示,一分类法对轻度认知障碍的预测准确率更高,而二分类法在识别健康对照组方面表现更好。步态特征是单类分类的最佳结果。结合单个模型比结合不同任务的特征效果更好。值得注意的是,一分类多数投票法的灵敏度为 87.5%,特异度为 75.7%,这表明它可以作为标准认知筛查测试的潜在替代方法。结论:我们的初步研究结果支持使用带有混淆控制的一类分类法来检测步态、指法、认知和双重任务的异常模式,以改善认知障碍的早期检测。要在更广泛的临床环境中证实该方法的有效性,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computer methods and programs in biomedicine
Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
6.60%
发文量
601
审稿时长
135 days
期刊介绍: To encourage the development of formal computing methods, and their application in biomedical research and medical practice, by illustration of fundamental principles in biomedical informatics research; to stimulate basic research into application software design; to report the state of research of biomedical information processing projects; to report new computer methodologies applied in biomedical areas; the eventual distribution of demonstrable software to avoid duplication of effort; to provide a forum for discussion and improvement of existing software; to optimize contact between national organizations and regional user groups by promoting an international exchange of information on formal methods, standards and software in biomedicine. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine covers computing methodology and software systems derived from computing science for implementation in all aspects of biomedical research and medical practice. It is designed to serve: biochemists; biologists; geneticists; immunologists; neuroscientists; pharmacologists; toxicologists; clinicians; epidemiologists; psychiatrists; psychologists; cardiologists; chemists; (radio)physicists; computer scientists; programmers and systems analysts; biomedical, clinical, electrical and other engineers; teachers of medical informatics and users of educational software.
期刊最新文献
Neuradicon: Operational representation learning of neuroimaging reports LMTTM-VMI: Linked Memory Token Turing Machine for 3D volumetric medical image classification Methods for estimating resting energy expenditure in intensive care patients: A comparative study of predictive equations with machine learning and deep learning approaches EEGConvNeXt: A novel convolutional neural network model for automated detection of Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia using EEG signals Hybrid-noise generative diffusion probabilistic model for cervical spine MRI image generation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1