Effectiveness and safety of Qianjinweijing decoction in the treatment of bronchiectasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE European Journal of Integrative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.eujim.2024.102418
Limin Zhang, Jin Su, Xiaozheng Wu, Wen Li, Yunzhi Chen
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of Qianjinweijing decoction in the treatment of bronchiectasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Limin Zhang,&nbsp;Jin Su,&nbsp;Xiaozheng Wu,&nbsp;Wen Li,&nbsp;Yunzhi Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2024.102418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Bronchiectasis is a chronic inflammatory airway disease marked by permanent dilation of the bronchi, recurrent infections, and associated complications. The traditional Chinese medicine Qianjinweijing Decoction (QJWJ) has shown promising results in bronchiectasis treatment with few side effects. However, there is a lack of recent comprehensive research evaluating its effectiveness. This review aims to examine the effectiveness and safety of QJWJ in treating bronchiectasis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched 7 databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP Chinese Science Database, China Biology Medicine Disc (Sinomed), PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) until May 2023, in both Chinese and English. Two researchers conducted a comprehensive review of literature, extracting data based on predefined criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 and RStudio software. Quality of evidence was evaluated using GRADEpro (V3.6.) software.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This review analysed 35 studies with 2609 patients. The QJWJ group consisted of 1318 patients, while the routine pharmacotherapy (RP) group had 1291 patients. Combining QJWJ and RP in bronchiectasis treatment showed better with clinical effectiveness [risk ratio (RR)=1.17, 95 % confidence interval (CI) (1.13, 1.21), <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001], the percentage of forced expiratory volume in the first second to the predicted value (FEV<sub>1</sub> %) [mean difference (MD)=3.52, 95 % CI (1.48, 5.55), <em>P</em> = 0.0007], the ratio of forced expiratory volume to forced vital capacity in the first second (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC) [MD=6.62, 95 % CI (1.52, 11.72), <em>P</em> = 0.01], peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) [MD=7.14, 95 % CI (5.15, 9.12), <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001], white blood cell count (WBC) [MD=-1.42, 95 % CI (-2.53, -0.31), <em>P</em> = 0.01], c-reactive protein (CRP) [MD=-7.2, 95 % CI (-9.3, -5.1), <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001], and the procalcitonin (PCT) [standardized mean difference (SMD)=-1.39, 95 % CI (-2.02, -0.76), <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001], without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions [RR=0.79, 95 % CI (0.44, 1.42), <em>P</em> = 0.43]. QJWJ alone also significantly improved bronchiectasis treatment, enhanced clinical effectiveness [RR=1.19, 95 % CI (1.04, 1.36), <em>P</em> = 0.010], FEV<sub>1</sub> % [MD=7.09, 95 % CI (4.5, 9.68), <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001], and reduced WBC [MD=-2.7, 95 % CI (-3.7, -1.7), <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001], CRP [MD=-4.22, 95 % CI (-55.32, -3.12), <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001], without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions [RR=0.20, 95 % CI (0.01, 4.06), <em>P</em> = 0.29].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Evidence suggested that QJWJ, used alone or with RP, notably improved bronchiectasis treatment outcomes, enhanced lung function and reduced inflammation without raising adverse reaction risks. Yet, further support from high-quality, large-sample RCTs is needed to strengthen this conclusion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":"72 ","pages":"Article 102418"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876382024000878","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Bronchiectasis is a chronic inflammatory airway disease marked by permanent dilation of the bronchi, recurrent infections, and associated complications. The traditional Chinese medicine Qianjinweijing Decoction (QJWJ) has shown promising results in bronchiectasis treatment with few side effects. However, there is a lack of recent comprehensive research evaluating its effectiveness. This review aims to examine the effectiveness and safety of QJWJ in treating bronchiectasis.

Methods

We searched 7 databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP Chinese Science Database, China Biology Medicine Disc (Sinomed), PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) until May 2023, in both Chinese and English. Two researchers conducted a comprehensive review of literature, extracting data based on predefined criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 and RStudio software. Quality of evidence was evaluated using GRADEpro (V3.6.) software.

Results

This review analysed 35 studies with 2609 patients. The QJWJ group consisted of 1318 patients, while the routine pharmacotherapy (RP) group had 1291 patients. Combining QJWJ and RP in bronchiectasis treatment showed better with clinical effectiveness [risk ratio (RR)=1.17, 95 % confidence interval (CI) (1.13, 1.21), P < 0.00001], the percentage of forced expiratory volume in the first second to the predicted value (FEV1 %) [mean difference (MD)=3.52, 95 % CI (1.48, 5.55), P = 0.0007], the ratio of forced expiratory volume to forced vital capacity in the first second (FEV1/FVC) [MD=6.62, 95 % CI (1.52, 11.72), P = 0.01], peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) [MD=7.14, 95 % CI (5.15, 9.12), P < 0.00001], white blood cell count (WBC) [MD=-1.42, 95 % CI (-2.53, -0.31), P = 0.01], c-reactive protein (CRP) [MD=-7.2, 95 % CI (-9.3, -5.1), P < 0.00001], and the procalcitonin (PCT) [standardized mean difference (SMD)=-1.39, 95 % CI (-2.02, -0.76), P < 0.0001], without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions [RR=0.79, 95 % CI (0.44, 1.42), P = 0.43]. QJWJ alone also significantly improved bronchiectasis treatment, enhanced clinical effectiveness [RR=1.19, 95 % CI (1.04, 1.36), P = 0.010], FEV1 % [MD=7.09, 95 % CI (4.5, 9.68), P < 0.00001], and reduced WBC [MD=-2.7, 95 % CI (-3.7, -1.7), P < 0.00001], CRP [MD=-4.22, 95 % CI (-55.32, -3.12), P < 0.00001], without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions [RR=0.20, 95 % CI (0.01, 4.06), P = 0.29].

Conclusion

Evidence suggested that QJWJ, used alone or with RP, notably improved bronchiectasis treatment outcomes, enhanced lung function and reduced inflammation without raising adverse reaction risks. Yet, further support from high-quality, large-sample RCTs is needed to strengthen this conclusion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
千金味精煎剂治疗支气管扩张症的有效性和安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Integrative Medicine
European Journal of Integrative Medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Integrative Medicine (EuJIM) considers manuscripts from a wide range of complementary and integrative health care disciplines, with a particular focus on whole systems approaches, public health, self management and traditional medical systems. The journal strives to connect conventional medicine and evidence based complementary medicine. We encourage submissions reporting research with relevance for integrative clinical practice and interprofessional education. EuJIM aims to be of interest to both conventional and integrative audiences, including healthcare practitioners, researchers, health care organisations, educationalists, and all those who seek objective and critical information on integrative medicine. To achieve this aim EuJIM provides an innovative international and interdisciplinary platform linking researchers and clinicians. The journal focuses primarily on original research articles including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, other clinical studies, qualitative, observational and epidemiological studies. In addition we welcome short reviews, opinion articles and contributions relating to health services and policy, health economics and psychology.
期刊最新文献
Effect of clinical control and symptom severity on attitudes towards holistic complementary alternative medicine in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A cross-sectional study Evolving research methodologies are shaping the future of integrative medicine Hotspots and trends in global antiviral herbal basic research: A visualization analysis Effectiveness and safety of Qianjinweijing decoction in the treatment of bronchiectasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Reflexology specific guidance for using the template for the intervention description and replication (TIDieR): A delphi study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1