Early identification of breakthrough technologies: Insights from science-driven innovations

IF 3.4 2区 管理学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Informetrics Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.joi.2024.101606
Dan Wang , Xiao Zhou , Pengwei Zhao , Juan Pang , Qiaoyang Ren
{"title":"Early identification of breakthrough technologies: Insights from science-driven innovations","authors":"Dan Wang ,&nbsp;Xiao Zhou ,&nbsp;Pengwei Zhao ,&nbsp;Juan Pang ,&nbsp;Qiaoyang Ren","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2024.101606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Identifying breakthrough technologies is crucial for advancing technological innovation and, in this sense, the innovation patterns driven by science are considered to be key pathways for forming breakthrough technologies. Building on this premise, this paper presents a framework for identifying breakthrough technologies that starts with these signals of scientific innovation. The first step in the method is to construct a science-technology knowledge network based on papers and patents. Then a two-stage selection method funnels the scientific innovation signals, filtering out those with the potential to trigger technological breakthroughs. Next, a machine learning-based link prediction model, integrating three types of features, identifies new links between science-driven signals and existing technologies. A community detection algorithm then identifies sub-networks of technologies formed around these new links. Finally, a structural entropy index is used to evaluate these sub-networks to determine potential breakthrough technologies. By systematically characterizing the content and core features of scientific innovation signals, this study reveals the driving sources of technological breakthroughs and sheds light on the absorption and diffusion processes of scientific innovation. We validated the method through a use case in the field of artificial intelligence. Those who manage technological innovation should find the insights of this research particularly valuable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Informetrics","volume":"19 1","pages":"Article 101606"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Informetrics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157724001184","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identifying breakthrough technologies is crucial for advancing technological innovation and, in this sense, the innovation patterns driven by science are considered to be key pathways for forming breakthrough technologies. Building on this premise, this paper presents a framework for identifying breakthrough technologies that starts with these signals of scientific innovation. The first step in the method is to construct a science-technology knowledge network based on papers and patents. Then a two-stage selection method funnels the scientific innovation signals, filtering out those with the potential to trigger technological breakthroughs. Next, a machine learning-based link prediction model, integrating three types of features, identifies new links between science-driven signals and existing technologies. A community detection algorithm then identifies sub-networks of technologies formed around these new links. Finally, a structural entropy index is used to evaluate these sub-networks to determine potential breakthrough technologies. By systematically characterizing the content and core features of scientific innovation signals, this study reveals the driving sources of technological breakthroughs and sheds light on the absorption and diffusion processes of scientific innovation. We validated the method through a use case in the field of artificial intelligence. Those who manage technological innovation should find the insights of this research particularly valuable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期识别突破性技术:科学驱动创新的启示
识别突破性技术对于推动技术创新至关重要,从这个意义上讲,科学驱动的创新模式被认为是形成突破性技术的关键途径。在此前提下,本文提出了一个以这些科学创新信号为出发点的突破性技术识别框架。该方法的第一步是基于论文和专利构建科技知识网络。然后,采用两阶段筛选法对科学创新信号进行过滤,筛选出那些有可能引发技术突破的信号。接下来,一个基于机器学习的链接预测模型会综合三种特征,识别科学驱动信号与现有技术之间的新链接。然后,社区检测算法会识别围绕这些新链接形成的技术子网络。最后,使用结构熵指数对这些子网络进行评估,以确定潜在的突破性技术。通过系统地描述科学创新信号的内容和核心特征,本研究揭示了技术突破的驱动源,并揭示了科学创新的吸收和扩散过程。我们通过人工智能领域的一个应用案例验证了这一方法。那些管理技术创新的人应该会发现本研究的见解特别有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Informetrics
Journal of Informetrics Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Journal of Informetrics (JOI) publishes rigorous high-quality research on quantitative aspects of information science. The main focus of the journal is on topics in bibliometrics, scientometrics, webometrics, patentometrics, altmetrics and research evaluation. Contributions studying informetric problems using methods from other quantitative fields, such as mathematics, statistics, computer science, economics and econometrics, and network science, are especially encouraged. JOI publishes both theoretical and empirical work. In general, case studies, for instance a bibliometric analysis focusing on a specific research field or a specific country, are not considered suitable for publication in JOI, unless they contain innovative methodological elements.
期刊最新文献
Acknowledging the new invisible colleague: Addressing the recognition of Open AI contributions in in scientific publishing Integrating persistence process into the analysis of technology convergence using STERGM Unveiling intrinsic interactions of science and technology in artificial intelligence using a network portrait divergence approach A Dirichlet-Multinomial mixture model of Statistical Science: Mapping the shift of a paradigm Integration vs segregation: Network analysis of interdisciplinarity in funded and unfunded research on infectious diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1