Scientific knowledge role transition prediction from a knowledge hierarchical structure perspective

IF 3.4 2区 管理学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Informetrics Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1016/j.joi.2024.101612
Jinqing Yang , Jiming Hu
{"title":"Scientific knowledge role transition prediction from a knowledge hierarchical structure perspective","authors":"Jinqing Yang ,&nbsp;Jiming Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2024.101612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There are several potential patterns in the evolution of scientific knowledge. In order to delve deeper into the changes in function and role during the evolution of knowledge, we have proposed a research framework that examines the transition of scientific knowledge roles from the perspective of a hierarchical structure. We constructed two classification models of transition possibility and transition type to predict whether one undergoes a role transition and which type of role transition it belongs to. Several datasets were constructed by utilizing the entire corpus of publications available in <em>PubMed</em> and the history records of <em>MeSH</em>. Among the tasks of transition type prediction and transition possibility prediction, the <em>Gradient Boosting</em> classifier performed the best. The binary classification model of transition possibility achieved a precision of 72.58 %, a recall of 71.04 %, and an F1 score of 71.78 %. The multi-classification model of transition possibility had a macro-F1 score of 61.29 %, a micro-F1 score of 84.07 %, and a weighted-F1 score of 82.90 %. Further, we found that the knowledge genealogy features contribute the most to the prediction of transition possibility while knowledge attribute and network structure features have a significantly greater influence on the prediction of transition type. Most features have an obvious effect on the role transition of the <strong><em>Content-change type</em></strong>, followed by <strong><em>Child-generation</em></strong> and <strong><em>Localization-shift types.</em></strong></div></div>","PeriodicalId":48662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Informetrics","volume":"19 1","pages":"Article 101612"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Informetrics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175115772400124X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are several potential patterns in the evolution of scientific knowledge. In order to delve deeper into the changes in function and role during the evolution of knowledge, we have proposed a research framework that examines the transition of scientific knowledge roles from the perspective of a hierarchical structure. We constructed two classification models of transition possibility and transition type to predict whether one undergoes a role transition and which type of role transition it belongs to. Several datasets were constructed by utilizing the entire corpus of publications available in PubMed and the history records of MeSH. Among the tasks of transition type prediction and transition possibility prediction, the Gradient Boosting classifier performed the best. The binary classification model of transition possibility achieved a precision of 72.58 %, a recall of 71.04 %, and an F1 score of 71.78 %. The multi-classification model of transition possibility had a macro-F1 score of 61.29 %, a micro-F1 score of 84.07 %, and a weighted-F1 score of 82.90 %. Further, we found that the knowledge genealogy features contribute the most to the prediction of transition possibility while knowledge attribute and network structure features have a significantly greater influence on the prediction of transition type. Most features have an obvious effect on the role transition of the Content-change type, followed by Child-generation and Localization-shift types.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从知识层次结构角度预测科学知识的角色转换
科学知识的演变有几种潜在的模式。为了深入探讨知识演化过程中功能和角色的变化,我们提出了一个研究框架,从层次结构的角度考察科学知识角色的转换。我们构建了过渡可能性和过渡类型两个分类模型,以预测是否发生角色过渡以及属于哪种类型的角色过渡。我们利用 PubMed 中的全部出版物语料库和 MeSH 的历史记录构建了多个数据集。在过渡类型预测和过渡可能性预测任务中,梯度提升分类器的表现最好。过渡可能性二元分类模型的精确度为 72.58 %,召回率为 71.04 %,F1 得分为 71.78 %。过渡可能性多分类模型的宏观 F1 得分为 61.29 %,微观 F1 得分为 84.07 %,加权 F1 得分为 82.90 %。此外,我们发现知识谱系特征对过渡可能性预测的贡献最大,而知识属性和网络结构特征对过渡类型预测的影响明显更大。大多数特征对 "内容变化 "类型的角色转换有明显影响,其次是 "子代 "和 "本地化转移 "类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Informetrics
Journal of Informetrics Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Journal of Informetrics (JOI) publishes rigorous high-quality research on quantitative aspects of information science. The main focus of the journal is on topics in bibliometrics, scientometrics, webometrics, patentometrics, altmetrics and research evaluation. Contributions studying informetric problems using methods from other quantitative fields, such as mathematics, statistics, computer science, economics and econometrics, and network science, are especially encouraged. JOI publishes both theoretical and empirical work. In general, case studies, for instance a bibliometric analysis focusing on a specific research field or a specific country, are not considered suitable for publication in JOI, unless they contain innovative methodological elements.
期刊最新文献
Acknowledging the new invisible colleague: Addressing the recognition of Open AI contributions in in scientific publishing Integrating persistence process into the analysis of technology convergence using STERGM Unveiling intrinsic interactions of science and technology in artificial intelligence using a network portrait divergence approach A Dirichlet-Multinomial mixture model of Statistical Science: Mapping the shift of a paradigm Integration vs segregation: Network analysis of interdisciplinarity in funded and unfunded research on infectious diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1