Impact of self-reported race on Villalta Scale postthrombotic syndrome scores and correlation with venous disease-specific quality of life: an exploratory analysis of the Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Trial

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102609
James Shih MD , Chu-Shu Gu PhD , Suresh Vedantham MD , John Kaufman MD , Susan R. Kahn MD
{"title":"Impact of self-reported race on Villalta Scale postthrombotic syndrome scores and correlation with venous disease-specific quality of life: an exploratory analysis of the Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Trial","authors":"James Shih MD ,&nbsp;Chu-Shu Gu PhD ,&nbsp;Suresh Vedantham MD ,&nbsp;John Kaufman MD ,&nbsp;Susan R. Kahn MD","doi":"10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Villalta Scale (VS) to diagnose postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) consists of 5 patient-reported leg symptoms and 6 clinician-rated leg signs. It is unknown how the scale performs across racial groups.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Our study explored if there were differences in VS scores, particularly clinician-rated signs components, according to self-reported race.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Exploratory analysis of the ATTRACT trial, a randomized controlled trial conducted at 56 US sites that investigated pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis to prevent PTS after proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT). At the 6-month visit after randomization, we compared self-reported Black (n = 123) and White (n = 541) participants for mean total VS score, VS symptoms score, VS signs score, individual signs scores, and correlation coefficients between VS signs and VS symptoms scores and between VS signs and Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study Quality of Life (VEINES-QOL) scores (a self-reported venous disease-specific quality of life measure).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mean total VS score (4.67 vs. 4.12, <em>P</em> = .54),VS signs score (1.66 vs. 2.00, <em>P</em> = .07), and VS symptoms score (2.83 vs. 2.04, <em>P</em> = .10) were similar between Black and White participants. The mean score for one individual VS sign, venous ectasia, was lower in Black vs. White participants (0.24 vs. 0.63, <em>P</em>&lt; .01). There was similar, modest correlation in Black and White participants between VS signs and VS symptoms scores (<em>r</em><sub>black</sub> = 0.19; <em>r</em><sub>white</sub> = 0.23) and between VS signs and VEINES-QOL scores (<em>r</em><sub>black</sub> = −0.32; <em>r</em><sub>white</sub> = −0.30). Results were adjusted for ATTRACT trial treatment group, age, sex, body mass index, DVT extent, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and congestive heart failure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings suggest that some differences in VS scores exist according to self-reported race. It is unclear whether these reflect clinicians’ underrating of some VS signs and/or differences in PTS severity. Further work is needed to understand how the VS performs across racial groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20893,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":"8 8","pages":"Article 102609"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924003042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Villalta Scale (VS) to diagnose postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) consists of 5 patient-reported leg symptoms and 6 clinician-rated leg signs. It is unknown how the scale performs across racial groups.

Objectives

Our study explored if there were differences in VS scores, particularly clinician-rated signs components, according to self-reported race.

Methods

Exploratory analysis of the ATTRACT trial, a randomized controlled trial conducted at 56 US sites that investigated pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis to prevent PTS after proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT). At the 6-month visit after randomization, we compared self-reported Black (n = 123) and White (n = 541) participants for mean total VS score, VS symptoms score, VS signs score, individual signs scores, and correlation coefficients between VS signs and VS symptoms scores and between VS signs and Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study Quality of Life (VEINES-QOL) scores (a self-reported venous disease-specific quality of life measure).

Results

Mean total VS score (4.67 vs. 4.12, P = .54),VS signs score (1.66 vs. 2.00, P = .07), and VS symptoms score (2.83 vs. 2.04, P = .10) were similar between Black and White participants. The mean score for one individual VS sign, venous ectasia, was lower in Black vs. White participants (0.24 vs. 0.63, P< .01). There was similar, modest correlation in Black and White participants between VS signs and VS symptoms scores (rblack = 0.19; rwhite = 0.23) and between VS signs and VEINES-QOL scores (rblack = −0.32; rwhite = −0.30). Results were adjusted for ATTRACT trial treatment group, age, sex, body mass index, DVT extent, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and congestive heart failure.

Conclusion

The findings suggest that some differences in VS scores exist according to self-reported race. It is unclear whether these reflect clinicians’ underrating of some VS signs and/or differences in PTS severity. Further work is needed to understand how the VS performs across racial groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我报告的种族对 Villalta 量表血栓后综合征评分的影响以及与静脉疾病生活质量的相关性:急性静脉血栓形成:急性静脉血栓形成:辅助导管定向溶栓的血栓清除试验的探索性分析
背景诊断血栓后综合征(PTS)的 Villalta 量表(VS)由患者报告的 5 个腿部症状和临床医生评定的 6 个腿部体征组成。方法对 ATTRACT 试验进行探索性分析,该试验是一项随机对照试验,在美国 56 个地点进行,研究了药物机械导管引导溶栓以预防近端深静脉血栓 (DVT) 后的 PTS。在随机化后 6 个月的回访中,我们比较了黑人(n = 123)和白人(n = 541)参与者自我报告的平均 VS 总分、VS 症状分、VS 体征分、单个体征分、VS 体征与 VS 症状分之间的相关系数以及 VS 体征与静脉功能不全流行病学和经济学生活质量研究 (VEINES-QOL) 分(一种自我报告的静脉疾病特异性生活质量测量指标)之间的相关系数。结果 黑人和白人参与者的平均 VS 总分(4.67 vs. 4.12,P = .54)、VS 体征得分(1.66 vs. 2.00,P = .07)和 VS 症状得分(2.83 vs. 2.04,P = .10)相似。黑人和白人参加者在静脉异位这一 VS 征兆上的平均得分较低(0.24 vs. 0.63,P< .01)。在黑人和白人参与者中,VS 征兆和 VS 症状评分之间(黑人 = 0.19;白人 = 0.23)以及 VS 征兆和 VEINES-QOL 评分之间(黑人 = -0.32;白人 = -0.30)存在类似的适度相关性。结果根据 ATTRACT 试验治疗组、年龄、性别、体重指数、深静脉血栓程度、高血压、糖尿病、血脂异常和充血性心力衰竭进行了调整。目前还不清楚这是否反映了临床医生对某些 VS 征兆的低估和/或 PTS 严重程度的差异。要了解 VS 在不同种族群体中的表现,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
212
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prophylaxis in von Willebrand disease with von Willebrand factor concentrate and nonfactor therapies Oral invasive procedures in Glanzmann thrombasthenia: a retrospective observational study Nonneutralizing antibodies in Nordic persons with moderate hemophilia A and B (the MoHem study) Impact of self-reported race on Villalta Scale postthrombotic syndrome scores and correlation with venous disease-specific quality of life: an exploratory analysis of the Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Trial External validation of the Leiden Thrombosis Recurrence Risk Prediction models (L-TRRiP) for the prediction of recurrence after a first venous thrombosis in the Heart and Vascular Health study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1