Survival outcomes of endometrial cancer patients with disease involving the lower uterine segment: A meta-analysis

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.11.031
Vasilios Pergialiotis , Maria Fanaki , Michail Panagiotopoulos , Konstantinos Bramis , Dimitrios Efthimios Vlachos , Georgios Daskalakis , Dimitrios Haidopoulos , Nikolaos Thomakos
{"title":"Survival outcomes of endometrial cancer patients with disease involving the lower uterine segment: A meta-analysis","authors":"Vasilios Pergialiotis ,&nbsp;Maria Fanaki ,&nbsp;Michail Panagiotopoulos ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Bramis ,&nbsp;Dimitrios Efthimios Vlachos ,&nbsp;Georgios Daskalakis ,&nbsp;Dimitrios Haidopoulos ,&nbsp;Nikolaos Thomakos","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.11.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Lower uterine segment (LUS) involvement is encountered in a small proportion of endometrial cancer patients and is associated with aggressive histological features. Despite the available evidence, there seems to be a lack of consensus concerning its actual impact on disease related survival.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>The search strategy involved the Medline, Scopus, <span><span>Clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL and Google Scholar databases. Nine studies were included in the present systematic review that recruited 3300 patients. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) were retrieved from Cox-regression analyses to limit the confounding effect of other factors that influence the course of the disease.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nine articles were included in the present <em>meta</em>-analysis that involved 3300 endometrial cancer patients. The <em>meta</em>-analysis revealed a significant difference in progression free survival that was found increased in patients without LUS involvement (HR 1.59, 95 % CI 1.22, 2.05, data from 9 studies). Similarly, a significantly smaller overall survival was observed among patients with LUS involvement (HR 1.69, 95 % CI, 1.34, 2.13, data from 7 studies). Sensitivity analysis revealed that there were no outliers in either outcome, however, the possibility of data manipulation could not be ruled out entirely.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results of this <em>meta</em>-analysis indicate that lower uterine segment involvement is associated with decreased survival outcomes. It remains unclear if these patients can benefit from adjuvant treatment in the absence of other negative prognostic indicators and this needs to be examined by future studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"304 ","pages":"Pages 70-76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211524006432","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Lower uterine segment (LUS) involvement is encountered in a small proportion of endometrial cancer patients and is associated with aggressive histological features. Despite the available evidence, there seems to be a lack of consensus concerning its actual impact on disease related survival.

Study design

The search strategy involved the Medline, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL and Google Scholar databases. Nine studies were included in the present systematic review that recruited 3300 patients. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) were retrieved from Cox-regression analyses to limit the confounding effect of other factors that influence the course of the disease.

Results

Nine articles were included in the present meta-analysis that involved 3300 endometrial cancer patients. The meta-analysis revealed a significant difference in progression free survival that was found increased in patients without LUS involvement (HR 1.59, 95 % CI 1.22, 2.05, data from 9 studies). Similarly, a significantly smaller overall survival was observed among patients with LUS involvement (HR 1.69, 95 % CI, 1.34, 2.13, data from 7 studies). Sensitivity analysis revealed that there were no outliers in either outcome, however, the possibility of data manipulation could not be ruled out entirely.

Conclusion

The results of this meta-analysis indicate that lower uterine segment involvement is associated with decreased survival outcomes. It remains unclear if these patients can benefit from adjuvant treatment in the absence of other negative prognostic indicators and this needs to be examined by future studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
子宫下段子宫内膜癌患者的生存预后:荟萃分析
研究目的子宫下段(LUS)受累在一小部分子宫内膜癌患者中出现,并与侵袭性组织学特征相关。研究设计检索策略包括 Medline、Scopus、Clinicaltrials.gov、EMBASE、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL 和 Google Scholar 数据库。本系统综述共纳入九项研究,招募了 3300 名患者。结果本荟萃分析共纳入 9 篇文章,涉及 3300 名子宫内膜癌患者。荟萃分析表明,无LUS受累的患者的无进展生存期有显著差异(HR 1.59,95 % CI 1.22,2.05,数据来自9项研究)。同样,在受 LUS 影响的患者中也观察到总生存期明显缩短(HR 1.69,95 % CI 1.34,2.13,数据来自 7 项研究)。敏感性分析表明,这两项结果均无异常值,但也不能完全排除数据操作的可能性。目前仍不清楚在没有其他不良预后指标的情况下,这些患者是否能从辅助治疗中获益,这还需要未来的研究来检验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
期刊最新文献
Screening on distress in fertility treatment (SCREENIVF): A systematic review Prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling of a paternally inherited chromosome 8q24.22q24.23 microdeletion in a Chinese family A rare case of giant placental chorioangioma causing polyhydramnios and fetal hydrops: A case report and literature review Validation and psychometric analysis of the Spanish version of the menstrual attitude questionnaire Betamethasone dosing interval at 12 or 24 h apart: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1