Mashael Maashi , Nada Alzaben , Noha Negm , V. Venkatesan , S. Sabarunisha Begum , P. Geetha
{"title":"Advanced landslide susceptibility mapping and analysis of driving mechanisms using ensemble machine learning models","authors":"Mashael Maashi , Nada Alzaben , Noha Negm , V. Venkatesan , S. Sabarunisha Begum , P. Geetha","doi":"10.1016/j.jsames.2024.105272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study focuses on advanced landslide susceptibility mapping in Bertioga, utilizing ensemble machine-learning models to identify and predict landslide-prone regions. Four algorithms—Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Gradient-Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Random Forest (RF)—were employed to model landslide susceptibility at a 30-m spatial scale, using thirteen landslide conditioning factors (LCFs). These LCFs include topographical, geological, and environmental variables significantly influencing landslide occurrence. The performance of each model was evaluated based on precision (P), recall (R), F1-Score, and area under the curve (AUC), ensuring a robust assessment of prediction accuracy. Furthermore, the models demonstrated varying area coverage in terms of susceptibility classes. For instance, MLP identified 15% of the study area as very low susceptibility, 22% as low, 18% as moderate, 18% as high, and 27% as very high. RF predicted 40% of the region as very low susceptibility, whereas GBDT indicated a substantial 45% of the area as very high risk. AdaBoost, on the other hand, assigned the highest moderate risk coverage at 31%. These results provide a comprehensive understanding of the spatial distribution of landslide risks. Results show that MLP and GBDT achieved higher accuracies in the susceptibility mapping, with AUC values ranging from 0.85 to 0.96. For instance, in Parque CauiBura, MLP and GBDT performed exceptionally well with AUC scores of 0.98 and 0.97, respectively. The average prediction for all cities yielded a high accuracy of 0.95 in Parque CauiBura, followed by 0.92 in Centro. These findings highlight the importance of using ensemble machine learning techniques in regional landslide susceptibility mapping, offering valuable insights for risk management and mitigation strategies in landslide-prone areas such as Bertioga.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of South American Earth Sciences","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 105272"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of South American Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895981124004942","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study focuses on advanced landslide susceptibility mapping in Bertioga, utilizing ensemble machine-learning models to identify and predict landslide-prone regions. Four algorithms—Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Gradient-Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Random Forest (RF)—were employed to model landslide susceptibility at a 30-m spatial scale, using thirteen landslide conditioning factors (LCFs). These LCFs include topographical, geological, and environmental variables significantly influencing landslide occurrence. The performance of each model was evaluated based on precision (P), recall (R), F1-Score, and area under the curve (AUC), ensuring a robust assessment of prediction accuracy. Furthermore, the models demonstrated varying area coverage in terms of susceptibility classes. For instance, MLP identified 15% of the study area as very low susceptibility, 22% as low, 18% as moderate, 18% as high, and 27% as very high. RF predicted 40% of the region as very low susceptibility, whereas GBDT indicated a substantial 45% of the area as very high risk. AdaBoost, on the other hand, assigned the highest moderate risk coverage at 31%. These results provide a comprehensive understanding of the spatial distribution of landslide risks. Results show that MLP and GBDT achieved higher accuracies in the susceptibility mapping, with AUC values ranging from 0.85 to 0.96. For instance, in Parque CauiBura, MLP and GBDT performed exceptionally well with AUC scores of 0.98 and 0.97, respectively. The average prediction for all cities yielded a high accuracy of 0.95 in Parque CauiBura, followed by 0.92 in Centro. These findings highlight the importance of using ensemble machine learning techniques in regional landslide susceptibility mapping, offering valuable insights for risk management and mitigation strategies in landslide-prone areas such as Bertioga.
期刊介绍:
Papers must have a regional appeal and should present work of more than local significance. Research papers dealing with the regional geology of South American cratons and mobile belts, within the following research fields:
-Economic geology, metallogenesis and hydrocarbon genesis and reservoirs.
-Geophysics, geochemistry, volcanology, igneous and metamorphic petrology.
-Tectonics, neo- and seismotectonics and geodynamic modeling.
-Geomorphology, geological hazards, environmental geology, climate change in America and Antarctica, and soil research.
-Stratigraphy, sedimentology, structure and basin evolution.
-Paleontology, paleoecology, paleoclimatology and Quaternary geology.
New developments in already established regional projects and new initiatives dealing with the geology of the continent will be summarized and presented on a regular basis. Short notes, discussions, book reviews and conference and workshop reports will also be included when relevant.