Effects of simulation-based education on nursing students’ perceptions of positive birth and natural birth approaches

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Clinical Simulation in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101649
Duygu Güleç Şatır , Şenay Ünsal Atan , Oya Kavlak , Gül Ertem , Hale Sezer , Figen Kazankaya , Sümeyye Tetik , Ruken Yağız Altıntaş , Selin Ahsun
{"title":"Effects of simulation-based education on nursing students’ perceptions of positive birth and natural birth approaches","authors":"Duygu Güleç Şatır ,&nbsp;Şenay Ünsal Atan ,&nbsp;Oya Kavlak ,&nbsp;Gül Ertem ,&nbsp;Hale Sezer ,&nbsp;Figen Kazankaya ,&nbsp;Sümeyye Tetik ,&nbsp;Ruken Yağız Altıntaş ,&nbsp;Selin Ahsun","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nursing education should be adjusted to align with national health priorities. In this study, we examined how simulation-based education impacted nursing students' knowledge, skills, and approaches to natural childbirth, as well as their self-confidence, perceptions of positive birth, and educational satisfaction.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 56 undergraduate nursing students were enrolled in this comparative, quasi-experimental, pre- and post-test designed study and were randomly assigned to a hybrid simulation (HS) or a video-model (VM) group.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Students in the HS group had significantly higher natural childbirth skill levels and positive perceptions than those in the VM group (<em>p</em> &lt; .05). Natural birth knowledge levels significantly increased in both groups (<em>p</em> &lt; .05). No significant differences in nursing students’ self-confidence and satisfaction levels were found between the two groups (<em>p</em> &gt; .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>HS improved nursing students’ natural birth approach skills and positively affected their perceptions. Simulation-based education may enhance maternity care practice. Simulation scenarios should be integrated into the nursing curriculum to provide comprehensive support for positive birth experiences.</div><div><strong>ClinicalTrials.gov</strong> Identifier: NCT06241443</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 101649"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924001415","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Nursing education should be adjusted to align with national health priorities. In this study, we examined how simulation-based education impacted nursing students' knowledge, skills, and approaches to natural childbirth, as well as their self-confidence, perceptions of positive birth, and educational satisfaction.

Methods

A total of 56 undergraduate nursing students were enrolled in this comparative, quasi-experimental, pre- and post-test designed study and were randomly assigned to a hybrid simulation (HS) or a video-model (VM) group.

Results

Students in the HS group had significantly higher natural childbirth skill levels and positive perceptions than those in the VM group (p < .05). Natural birth knowledge levels significantly increased in both groups (p < .05). No significant differences in nursing students’ self-confidence and satisfaction levels were found between the two groups (p > .05).

Conclusion

HS improved nursing students’ natural birth approach skills and positively affected their perceptions. Simulation-based education may enhance maternity care practice. Simulation scenarios should be integrated into the nursing curriculum to provide comprehensive support for positive birth experiences.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06241443
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟教育对护理专业学生积极分娩和自然分娩观念的影响
背景护理教育应根据国家健康优先事项进行调整。在这项研究中,我们考察了模拟教育如何影响护理专业学生的自然分娩知识、技能和方法,以及他们的自信心、对积极分娩的看法和教育满意度。方法共有 56 名护理专业本科生参加了这项前测和后测设计的准实验性对比研究,并被随机分配到混合模拟(HS)组或视频模拟(VM)组。两组学生的自然分娩知识水平均有明显提高(p <.05)。两组护生的自信心和满意度无明显差异(p >.05)。模拟教学可提高产妇护理实践水平。模拟情景应纳入护理课程,为积极的分娩体验提供全面支持:NCT06241443
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
期刊最新文献
Competency-based education: Simulation educators, don't be Afraid! These sims are different! Thematic analysis of interdisciplinary faculty experiences designing virtual simulations Medication safety simulation training for anesthesia professionals Perioperative inter-professional education training enhance team performance and readiness Breaking down blood transfusion administration: An in-scenario debriefing simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1